Best Rolex prices in Europe-I go in a month for a month! -J.D. Hill ® ( Feb 10, 01:16, 2006 ) (525 reads) ( 316 bytes )

Need Help! -D Parola ® ( Feb 10, 00:01, 2006 ) (896 reads) ( 659 bytes ) Re: Need Help! -alexx zz ® ( Feb 11, 09:07, 2006 ) (574 reads) ( 385 bytes )

first time buyer -Goh ® ( Feb 09, 18:00, 2006 ) (670 reads) ( 259 bytes ) Re: first time buyer -sagxman ® ( Feb 10, 21:39, 2006 ) (450 reads) ( 375 bytes )

Need bubbleback Identification assistance -alex e. ® ( Feb 09, 04:38, 2006 ) (390 reads) ( 738 bytes )

This forum is closed for posting. Please register for your new account at >>> -WatchUseek Admin ® ( May 08, 07:07, 2005 ) (90 reads) ( 263 bytes )

IMPORTANT: This forum will be disabled later today. -GMF ® ( May 07, 19:07, 2005 ) (179 reads) ( 525 bytes ) Re: IMPORTANT: This forum will be disabled later today. -Jaime P ® ( May 07, 20:59, 2005 ) (213 reads) ( 10 bytes )

some technical information on two older movements? -Byron ® ( May 07, 15:48, 2005 ) (219 reads) ( 237 bytes )

News Announcing the BIG MOVE !! >>> -Ernie Romers ® ( May 07, 12:14, 2005 ) (122 reads) ( 1076 bytes )

Review new turn-o-graph -doug kiser ® ( May 07, 02:14, 2005 ) (1643 reads) ( 320 bytes )

Help identify a watch -rongallant ® ( May 06, 22:09, 2005 ) (751 reads) ( 184 bytes ) Thats the watch, thanks all (nt) -rongallant ® ( May 07, 15:26, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Help identify a watch -mbogo ® ( May 07, 00:38, 2005 ) (1148 reads) ( 34 bytes ) Re: Help identify a watch -doug kiser ® ( May 07, 02:35, 2005 ) (265 reads) ( 49 bytes ) Re: Help identify a watch -rongallant ® ( May 07, 01:14, 2005 ) (210 reads) ( 63 bytes ) Thunderbird to some Turn-o-graph to others. (nt) -Clifton ® ( May 07, 02:48, 2005 ) (28 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Do you have a picture? (nt) -rissac ® ( May 06, 22:15, 2005 ) (62 reads) ( 0 bytes ) No, looked and could not find it. (nt) -rongallant ® ( May 06, 22:17, 2005 ) (42 reads) ( 0 bytes ) What is that type of bezel called? (nt) -maverick ® ( May 07, 02:15, 2005 ) (211 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Rolex Database -RonGallant ® ( May 06, 21:19, 2005 ) (369 reads) ( 235 bytes ) This is a good one -rissac ® ( May 06, 21:24, 2005 ) (269 reads) ( 144 bytes ) Thanks! (nt) -rongallant ® ( May 07, 01:15, 2005 ) (415 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Took some pics of my OQ today >>>> -GMF ® ( May 05, 22:09, 2005 ) (909 reads) ( 310 bytes ) good pics what camera do you use to take them (nt) -rickmeister ® ( May 06, 05:10, 2005 ) (163 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Nikon Coolpix >>>> -GMF ® ( May 06, 05:48, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 132 bytes ) FAKE.... -watchlvr ® ( May 06, 03:45, 2005 ) (1623 reads) ( 40 bytes ) very very nice........... -cmf ® ( May 06, 00:58, 2005 ) (537 reads) ( 54 bytes ) Re: Took some pics of my OQ today >>>> -nuprin ® ( May 05, 23:28, 2005 ) (161 reads) ( 141 bytes ) It ticks, but not like "other" quartz watches >>>> -GMF ® ( May 06, 01:44, 2005 ) (85 reads) ( 897 bytes )

Better late than never with my GMTII -Clifton ® ( May 05, 17:08, 2005 ) (1218 reads) ( 986 bytes ) Re: Better late than never with my GMTII -eric james ® ( May 06, 13:31, 2005 ) (208 reads) ( 352 bytes )

GMT2 novice needs help! -stephaniegmt ® ( May 05, 10:39, 2005 ) (2145 reads) ( 288 bytes ) Re: GMT2 novice needs help! -fwellers ® ( May 05, 14:13, 2005 ) (163 reads) ( 113 bytes ) Re: GMT2 novice needs help! -Deerya ® ( May 05, 12:28, 2005 ) (255 reads) ( 185 bytes ) Re: GMT2 novice needs help! -eric james ® ( May 05, 12:07, 2005 ) (86 reads) ( 575 bytes ) Re: GMT2 novice needs help! -stephaniegmt ® ( May 05, 15:08, 2005 ) (596 reads) ( 58 bytes )

For those who own a Sub.... -watchlvr ® ( May 05, 09:36, 2005 ) (983 reads) ( 319 bytes ) my kermit does have an ever so soft "ribbit" (nt) -jimand7 ® ( May 06, 04:55, 2005 ) (262 reads) ( 0 bytes ) my kermit does have an ever so soft "ribbit" (nt) -jimand7 ® ( May 06, 04:54, 2005 ) (127 reads) ( 0 bytes ) yep.... -David Riddle ® ( May 05, 21:09, 2005 ) (682 reads) ( 172 bytes ) Re: For those who own a Sub.... -RGSP ® ( May 05, 16:12, 2005 ) (1116 reads) ( 382 bytes ) Yes, I can definitely hear and feel the 'rotor' -watchlvr ® ( May 05, 21:26, 2005 ) (262 reads) ( 31 bytes ) Re: For those who own a Sub.... -watchlvr ® ( May 05, 09:41, 2005 ) (282 reads) ( 180 bytes ) A ticking Sub? I guess it's a bomb -Evert ® ( May 05, 09:55, 2005 ) (886 reads) ( 176 bytes ) Re: A ticking Sub? I guess it's a bomb -bsavitz ® ( May 05, 12:38, 2005 ) (84 reads) ( 231 bytes ) Yep >>>> -GMF ® ( May 05, 17:12, 2005 ) (585 reads) ( 139 bytes ) Re: Yep >>>> -maverick ® ( May 05, 20:05, 2005 ) (440 reads) ( 50 bytes )

Looks like the fakes dont stop with just Rolex [edited by moderator] -Rissac ® ( May 05, 03:38, 2005 ) (744 reads) ( 196 bytes ) Re: Looks like the fakes dont stop with just Rolex [edited by moderator] -ResOGlas ® ( May 05, 05:10, 2005 ) (355 reads) ( 177 bytes ) Re: Looks like the fakes dont stop with just Rolex -maverick ® ( May 05, 05:33, 2005 ) (305 reads) ( 173 bytes ) Re: Looks like the fakes dont stop with just Rolex -Matt Markis ® ( May 05, 06:28, 2005 ) (96 reads) ( 254 bytes ) Re: Looks like the fakes dont stop with just Rolex -ResOGlas ® ( May 05, 07:13, 2005 ) (600 reads) ( 139 bytes )

amazon.com 89.00 winder review -maverick ® ( May 05, 02:53, 2005 ) (198 reads) ( 874 bytes ) Re: amazon.com 89.00 winder review -Lon ® ( May 06, 23:00, 2005 ) (75 reads) ( 377 bytes ) See for yourself>>>>>>>>> -maverick ® ( May 06, 02:24, 2005 ) (57 reads) ( 274 bytes )

has anyone visited the rolex company?!?!?! -cmf ® ( May 05, 00:10, 2005 ) (331 reads) ( 130 bytes )

Fake or Not? daytona -joe236 ® ( May 04, 20:57, 2005 ) (486 reads) ( 0 bytes ) its fake... (nt) -yazan ® ( May 06, 05:21, 2005 ) (249 reads) ( 0 bytes ) its fake... (nt) -yazan ® ( May 06, 05:19, 2005 ) (797 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Great eye Clifton... -WilliamsGPE ® ( May 05, 08:07, 2005 ) (1371 reads) ( 586 bytes ) Re: daytona -ResOGlas ® ( May 05, 07:20, 2005 ) (133 reads) ( 66 bytes ) Re: daytona -maverick ® ( May 05, 04:06, 2005 ) (878 reads) ( 319 bytes ) Fake - Take it back!!! -Clifton ® ( May 05, 01:22, 2005 ) (1527 reads) ( 563 bytes ) Good catch. I didn't notice that. -GMF ® ( May 05, 02:26, 2005 ) (712 reads) ( 313 bytes ) Re: daytona -maverick ® ( May 05, 01:13, 2005 ) (110 reads) ( 188 bytes ) Re: daytona -joe236 ® ( May 04, 23:54, 2005 ) (277 reads) ( 0 bytes ) and the answer is -joe236 ® ( May 04, 23:42, 2005 ) (108 reads) ( 254 bytes ) Re: and the answer is -Joel Morgan ® ( May 05, 00:55, 2005 ) (243 reads) ( 35 bytes ) Fake. (nt) -B.Chidanand ® ( May 04, 22:38, 2005 ) (58 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Real [Edit: I now think I was wrong] >>>> -GMF ® ( May 04, 22:29, 2005 ) (122 reads) ( 296 bytes ) How can it be real without the serial # at 6, that is what I wanna know... -randys ® ( May 05, 03:06, 2005 ) (419 reads) ( 71 bytes ) What about the crown? Looks to way to obvious...... (nt) -maverick ® ( May 04, 22:33, 2005 ) (58 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Fake. Look at that laser etching... (nt) -ResOGlas ® ( May 04, 21:33, 2005 ) (202 reads) ( 0 bytes )

GMT2 bezel question -stephaniegmt ® ( May 04, 13:51, 2005 ) (326 reads) ( 138 bytes ) I used to shower in mine and soap gunk made mine real tight -Bongobilly ® ( May 04, 20:43, 2005 ) (790 reads) ( 44 bytes ) Re: I used to shower in mine and soap gunk made mine real tight -RJ66 ® ( May 04, 23:01, 2005 ) (154 reads) ( 78 bytes ) I never take my watch off, why bother? Just have to put it back on again. (nt) -molex ® ( May 06, 23:50, 2005 ) (207 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Why not? Just curious. Is it going to melt? (nt) -Bongobilly ® ( May 04, 23:29, 2005 ) (25 reads) ( 0 bytes ) No, but you can't clean your wrist. (nt) -KentW ® ( May 05, 13:49, 2005 ) (140 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Easy to pop it off and clean, probably just dirty. Here >>> -molex ® ( May 04, 19:05, 2005 ) (67 reads) ( 345 bytes ) Re: Easy to pop it off and clean, probably just dirty. Here >>> -nuprin ® ( May 04, 19:54, 2005 ) (325 reads) ( 74 bytes ) Several options >>> -molex ® ( May 04, 21:20, 2005 ) (92 reads) ( 386 bytes ) Re: GMT2 bezel question -RJ66 ® ( May 04, 18:25, 2005 ) (122 reads) ( 166 bytes ) Might be an accumulation of dirt -Mort ® ( May 04, 17:07, 2005 ) (207 reads) ( 110 bytes ) Re: Might be an accumulation of dirt -stephaniegmt ® ( May 04, 20:40, 2005 ) (62 reads) ( 33 bytes )

Your opinions on Tudor watches, please. -ResOGlas ® ( May 04, 09:40, 2005 ) (104 reads) ( 590 bytes ) Re: Your opinions on Tudor watches, please. -Tudorman ® ( May 05, 23:33, 2005 ) (102 reads) ( 918 bytes ) Rolex movements vs. ETA? >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( May 04, 13:43, 2005 ) (136 reads) ( 3072 bytes ) Thanks for the assessment! (nt) -leewmeister ® ( May 04, 15:43, 2005 ) (41 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Rolex movements vs. ETA? >>> -bsavitz ® ( May 04, 14:07, 2005 ) (78 reads) ( 361 bytes )

Is the Daytona the top of the line sports model? -b2man ® ( May 04, 04:56, 2005 ) (180 reads) ( 80 bytes ) I would say "better" is subjective. -Bongobilly ® ( May 04, 20:41, 2005 ) (770 reads) ( 350 bytes ) Each watch is designed with a different purpose in mind - no hierarchy at all (nt) -Lyndon ® ( May 04, 06:51, 2005 ) (122 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Even if there is a "hierarchy" amongst SS Rolexes (there isn't)>>> -molex ® ( May 04, 05:06, 2005 ) (142 reads) ( 648 bytes ) the one exception being my personal YM, we both know it was made special (nt) -RandyS ® ( May 05, 01:52, 2005 ) (61 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Even if there is a "hierarchy" amongst SS Rolexes (there isn't)>>> -ResOGlas ® ( May 04, 08:34, 2005 ) (189 reads) ( 104 bytes ) LOL! I wear a Sub every day, never been diving in my life! (nt) -molex ® ( May 04, 19:06, 2005 ) (427 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Can a Rolex AD replace the dial for an older model datejust? -Elgreco ® ( May 04, 01:06, 2005 ) (153 reads) ( 139 bytes ) Depends on the AD, I just got my TT Sub back recently -Bongobilly ® ( May 04, 04:54, 2005 ) (113 reads) ( 286 bytes ) Re: Can a Rolex AD replace the dial for an older model datejust? -pmar124 ® ( May 04, 04:43, 2005 ) (246 reads) ( 532 bytes ) In my experience, most Rolex AD's >>> -molex ® ( May 04, 01:12, 2005 ) (213 reads) ( 259 bytes )

6694 -Scott Grady ® ( May 03, 23:17, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 471 bytes )

Hi all how much should one pay for rolex submariner with diamond face with date -rahul ® ( May 03, 19:16, 2005 ) (233 reads) ( 317 bytes ) Whatever you are comfortable paying >>>>> -molex ® ( May 04, 01:00, 2005 ) (59 reads) ( 370 bytes ) look here. http://www.hessfineart.com i think he has one. (nt) -rickmeister ® ( May 04, 04:29, 2005 ) (245 reads) ( 0 bytes ) I think he was looking for numbers, not all of us are Donald Trump. (nt) -Bongobilly ® ( May 04, 01:33, 2005 ) (113 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Point taken. (nt) -molex ® ( May 04, 02:53, 2005 ) (103 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Finally I have it... -Corrado ® ( May 03, 15:52, 2005 ) (282 reads) ( 337 bytes ) FANTASTIC! -WilliamsGPE ® ( May 04, 17:43, 2005 ) (51 reads) ( 474 bytes ) WOW! That's a VERY nice example of a very rare watch, good buy! (nt) -molex ® ( May 04, 01:02, 2005 ) (80 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Finally I have it... -thesharkman ® ( May 03, 21:49, 2005 ) (386 reads) ( 122 bytes ) Re: Finally I have it... -Corrado ® ( May 03, 22:37, 2005 ) (328 reads) ( 120 bytes ) Re: Finally I have it... -thesharkman ® ( May 04, 02:11, 2005 ) (90 reads) ( 105 bytes ) ...more pics -Corrado ® ( May 03, 18:50, 2005 ) (61 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Wow wow wow, original bevel on the case even, it looks almost brand new! -molex ® ( May 04, 01:04, 2005 ) (99 reads) ( 246 bytes ) Re: Wow wow wow, original bevel on the case even, it looks almost brand new! -Corrado ® ( May 04, 10:57, 2005 ) (187 reads) ( 543 bytes ) What year does that bad boy hail from? (nt) -leewmeister ® ( May 03, 16:40, 2005 ) (49 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: What year does that bad boy hail from? -Corrado ® ( May 03, 18:39, 2005 ) (35 reads) ( 41 bytes )

My Review of "The Best of Time Rolex Wristwatches" by Mssrs. Dowling/Hess -maverick ® ( May 03, 06:18, 2005 ) (436 reads) ( 2532 bytes ) Re: My Review of "The Best of Time Rolex Wristwatches" by Mssrs. Dowling/Hess -ResOGlas ® ( May 03, 06:55, 2005 ) (39 reads) ( 43 bytes )

Service suggestions -Scottd ® ( May 03, 04:18, 2005 ) (974 reads) ( 390 bytes ) Re: Service suggestions -KentW ® ( May 03, 18:24, 2005 ) (657 reads) ( 1751 bytes ) Re: Service suggestions -ResOGlas ® ( May 03, 20:29, 2005 ) (157 reads) ( 117 bytes ) Re: Service suggestions -KentW ® ( May 04, 00:49, 2005 ) (51 reads) ( 359 bytes ) Re: Service suggestions -ResOGlas ® ( May 04, 09:34, 2005 ) (417 reads) ( 140 bytes ) Rolex will not do anything without your approval -Mort ® ( May 03, 16:38, 2005 ) (246 reads) ( 227 bytes ) Not true >>>> -molex ® ( May 04, 01:11, 2005 ) (126 reads) ( 368 bytes ) But they're not *supposed* to... >>> -KentW ® ( May 04, 23:58, 2005 ) (271 reads) ( 419 bytes ) Re: Service suggestions -ResOGlas ® ( May 03, 06:00, 2005 ) (99 reads) ( 122 bytes ) yes -scottd ® ( May 03, 13:38, 2005 ) (215 reads) ( 187 bytes )

Rolex Daytona -Jan-Philipp ® ( May 02, 20:30, 2005 ) (1187 reads) ( 118 bytes ) Re: Rolex Daytona -Jan-Philipp ® ( May 03, 17:38, 2005 ) (142 reads) ( 233 bytes ) Re: Rolex Daytona -ResOGlas ® ( May 02, 22:40, 2005 ) (321 reads) ( 207 bytes )

A good Rolex Beater -paul brown ® ( May 02, 03:30, 2005 ) (141 reads) ( 42 bytes ) Yeah >>>> -GMF ® ( May 02, 04:38, 2005 ) (355 reads) ( 125 bytes ) Re: A good Rolex Beater -ResOGlas ® ( May 02, 03:39, 2005 ) (41 reads) ( 105 bytes ) Re: A good Rolex Beater -eric james ® ( May 02, 11:05, 2005 ) (81 reads) ( 191 bytes ) GMT II QUESTION..... -ediotalevi ® ( May 02, 17:37, 2005 ) (41 reads) ( 160 bytes )

general question -Vincent III ® ( May 02, 02:11, 2005 ) (572 reads) ( 141 bytes ) Re: general question -ResOGlas ® ( May 02, 03:32, 2005 ) (114 reads) ( 168 bytes ) Yes. (nt) -GMF ® ( May 02, 03:26, 2005 ) (27 reads) ( 0 bytes )

"Will X break a Rolex???" Let's look at it another way... -WilliamsGPE ® ( May 01, 21:20, 2005 ) (141 reads) ( 572 bytes ) Re: "Will X break a Rolex???" Let's look at it another way... -robert lacy ® ( May 02, 22:50, 2005 ) (211 reads) ( 207 bytes ) Re: "Will X break a Rolex???" Let's look at it another way... -Eduard Lerman ® ( May 02, 06:40, 2005 ) (69 reads) ( 245 bytes ) This was posted once before, but interesting none the less. -Clifton ® ( May 02, 04:12, 2005 ) (296 reads) ( 84 bytes ) Re: This was posted once before, but interesting none the less. -paul brown ® ( May 02, 05:56, 2005 ) (689 reads) ( 104 bytes ) Re: "Will X break a Rolex???" Let's look at it another way... -ResOGlas ® ( May 01, 21:32, 2005 ) (184 reads) ( 261 bytes )

Rolex dial? -Byron ® ( May 01, 21:08, 2005 ) (167 reads) ( 254 bytes ) Singer makes dials for Rolex; has for a long time (nt) -mbogo ® ( May 02, 21:26, 2005 ) (159 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Rolex Service -Martini ® ( May 01, 19:13, 2005 ) (677 reads) ( 386 bytes ) Re: Rolex Service -Edward Steenstra ® ( May 01, 20:19, 2005 ) (38 reads) ( 269 bytes ) They either replace the case or re-machine it? -Byron ® ( May 01, 21:00, 2005 ) (389 reads) ( 329 bytes ) Some clarification >>>> -GMF ® ( May 01, 19:26, 2005 ) (80 reads) ( 379 bytes )

Rolex and Motorcycles -eric james ® ( May 01, 14:58, 2005 ) (66 reads) ( 684 bytes ) Re: Rolex and Motorcycles (long) -WMD ® ( May 02, 15:47, 2005 ) (21 reads) ( 1495 bytes )

Fake or Not? Fake or not -Anders Almgren ® ( May 01, 14:26, 2005 ) (242 reads) ( 151 bytes ) 100% fake (nt) -yazan ® ( May 04, 04:57, 2005 ) (99 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Me 3, fake garbage. (nt) -molex ® ( May 01, 19:31, 2005 ) (178 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Ditto GMF -- Fake. Date is too small, end pieces look like junk, etc. (nt) -WilliamsGPE ® ( May 01, 18:37, 2005 ) (154 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Fake. (nt) -GMF ® ( May 01, 16:55, 2005 ) (131 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Fake. -ResOGlas ® ( May 01, 21:41, 2005 ) (386 reads) ( 208 bytes )

Rolex for Golf ? -SkyPipe ® ( May 01, 09:58, 2005 ) (169 reads) ( 372 bytes ) This Q gets raised all the time...wear your Rolex while golfing and enjoy! -jrod ® ( May 03, 05:03, 2005 ) (148 reads) ( 304 bytes ) It's generally not recommended. -tzjm ® ( May 02, 03:27, 2005 ) (130 reads) ( 2105 bytes ) Maybe damaging to your game... -WilliamsGPE ® ( May 01, 18:35, 2005 ) (25 reads) ( 410 bytes ) Always wear mine while golfiing, lowers my handicap by 6 LOL (nt) -maverick ® ( May 02, 22:41, 2005 ) (126 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Does anyone know of any Tudor forums? -ResOGlas ® ( May 01, 08:14, 2005 ) (82 reads) ( 71 bytes ) watchspot.net, I believe.... (nt) -dkman ® ( May 01, 16:53, 2005 ) (22 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: watchspot.net, I believe.... -ResOGlas ® ( May 01, 21:29, 2005 ) (182 reads) ( 135 bytes ) I've not found one... But several of us here love 'em! Ask away! (nt) -Scott Grady ® ( May 06, 17:43, 2005 ) (49 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Why do I not care any longer if my Sub -RJ66 ® ( May 01, 07:45, 2005 ) (319 reads) ( 156 bytes )

thks for gold vs ss opininions.will welding cause interference in a Rolex? -cmf ® ( May 01, 02:23, 2005 ) (93 reads) ( 171 bytes ) Not unless you are actually welding on the watch itself. ) (nt) -maverick ® ( May 01, 04:47, 2005 ) (66 reads) ( 0 bytes ) i would not wear a rolex around a welding job. just my opinion you have too -rickmeister ® ( May 01, 03:13, 2005 ) (15 reads) ( 33 bytes )

Hot or Not? Tudor Oyster Commander - your opinions? -ResOGlas ® ( Apr 30, 19:38, 2005 ) (483 reads) ( 912 bytes ) Re: Tudor Oyster Commander - your opinions? -ResOGlas ® ( Apr 30, 21:41, 2005 ) (49 reads) ( 45 bytes ) Re: Tudor Oyster Commander - your opinions? -ResOGlas ® ( May 02, 00:24, 2005 ) (48 reads) ( 53 bytes ) Re: Tudor Oyster Commander - your opinions? -Scott Grady ® ( May 06, 17:50, 2005 ) (126 reads) ( 628 bytes ) Re: Tudor Oyster Commander - your opinions? -ResOGlas ® ( May 06, 20:30, 2005 ) (62 reads) ( 636 bytes )

Sold my Sub today now i want a GMTII any good sources? (nt) -AzFlipper ® ( Apr 30, 07:40, 2005 ) (954 reads) ( 0 bytes ) try eiltetime.com they have some . clik the auction site too. (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 22:03, 2005 ) (321 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Authorized dealer? Sales corner? eBay? (nt) -molex ® ( Apr 30, 21:22, 2005 ) (26 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Rolex production -Rissac ® ( Apr 30, 03:45, 2005 ) (411 reads) ( 213 bytes ) Re: Rolex production -Matt Markis ® ( Apr 30, 07:28, 2005 ) (140 reads) ( 144 bytes ) I would just tell him there are about 11 fakes made for every real one ) -maverick ® ( Apr 30, 04:34, 2005 ) (153 reads) ( 191 bytes )

Is perfect timing.com reliable for Rolex watch purchasing -Pam Pritchard ® ( Apr 30, 01:36, 2005 ) (182 reads) ( 175 bytes )

to buy a stainless or stainless & gold?!?!?! -cmf ® ( Apr 29, 23:15, 2005 ) (74 reads) ( 313 bytes ) Some buyers avoid gold because, being softer than ss, it scratches more easily.( (nt) -Mort ® ( Apr 30, 07:15, 2005 ) (76 reads) ( 0 bytes ) And stretches more easily. A concern if you wear 24/7/365. To each his own. (nt) -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 30, 18:54, 2005 ) (20 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: to buy a stainless or stainless & gold?!?!?! -maverick ® ( Apr 30, 04:48, 2005 ) (64 reads) ( 181 bytes ) The amount of gold in a TT Sub (18k if it is newer) is so little that I dont -RandyS ® ( Apr 30, 01:38, 2005 ) (134 reads) ( 406 bytes ) Re: The amount of gold in a TT Sub (18k if it is newer) is so little that I dont -paul brown ® ( Apr 30, 03:02, 2005 ) (167 reads) ( 841 bytes ) well it is just a matter of choice really. but i think the ss with the center -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 00:58, 2005 ) (105 reads) ( 53 bytes )

I'd like a second opinion to make sure >>> -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 29, 19:27, 2005 ) (186 reads) ( 123 bytes ) Re: I'd like a second opinion to make sure >>> -BaoFA ® ( May 02, 16:22, 2005 ) (297 reads) ( 45 bytes ) Definately real but I don't see a watch -tchaos ® ( May 03, 13:39, 2005 ) (41 reads) ( 48 bytes ) Definitely fake... -KentW ® ( May 01, 18:04, 2005 ) (519 reads) ( 52 bytes ) She's wearing a watch? I like the two puppies she's holding! (nt) -azgmt ® ( Apr 30, 19:43, 2005 ) (19 reads) ( 0 bytes ) i maybe wrong but i think most are more interested in what is behind her arms (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 00:59, 2005 ) (39 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: I'd like a second opinion to make sure >>> -Jeff Klott ® ( Apr 29, 21:24, 2005 ) (324 reads) ( 55 bytes ) FAKE! >>> -leewmeister ® ( Apr 29, 20:46, 2005 ) (64 reads) ( 41 bytes ) Is it a Seadweller or a Sub No Date? (nt) -Evert ® ( Apr 29, 20:19, 2005 ) (69 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Huh? -GMF ® ( Apr 29, 19:34, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 34 bytes ) I cannot find any watch, either. ) (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 30, 04:50, 2005 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes ) I do not think she is a seadweller or i am on my way back to the ocean. (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 01:01, 2005 ) (81 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: I do not think she is a seadweller or i am on my way back to the ocean. -jkim2001 ® ( Apr 30, 03:47, 2005 ) (51 reads) ( 86 bytes ) proves are you human, just like me. (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 04:57, 2005 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes )

GMT ii now running +5/day -- is this watch going nuts? -tom k ® ( Apr 29, 16:30, 2005 ) (170 reads) ( 252 bytes ) Re: GMT ii now running +5/day -- is this watch going nuts? -masraum ® ( Apr 30, 03:50, 2005 ) (363 reads) ( 236 bytes ) If I Told you how my new YM is keeping time I would be admitting that I -RandyS ® ( Apr 30, 01:41, 2005 ) (115 reads) ( 103 bytes ) Yep...your watch is "headed for doom" >> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 29, 18:28, 2005 ) (102 reads) ( 435 bytes ) 5 minutes or 5 seconds? -Dennis Smith ® ( Apr 29, 17:57, 2005 ) (96 reads) ( 59 bytes ) Re: 5 minutes or 5 seconds? -tom k ® ( Apr 29, 18:02, 2005 ) (92 reads) ( 62 bytes ) The behaviour of your watch is normal.. -esben buhl ® ( Apr 29, 20:00, 2005 ) (36 reads) ( 707 bytes ) what exactly is involved in the regulation process? -tom k ® ( Apr 29, 20:52, 2005 ) (91 reads) ( 15 bytes ) Re: what exactly is involved in the regulation process? -esben buhl ® ( Apr 29, 21:43, 2005 ) (299 reads) ( 442 bytes ) Not much you can do but wait and see, then take the appropriate action ) (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 29, 19:30, 2005 ) (139 reads) ( 0 bytes ) This is the reason I said that>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -maverick ® ( Apr 30, 04:25, 2005 ) (514 reads) ( 501 bytes )

does anyone know if elitetime in boston is reputable to buy a rolex from (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 29, 05:51, 2005 ) (466 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: does anyone know if elitetime in boston is reputable to buy a rolex from -ted1 ® ( Apr 29, 23:32, 2005 ) (54 reads) ( 58 bytes ) thanks (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 01:02, 2005 ) (109 reads) ( 0 bytes ) We bought my wife's mid-size YachtMaster there. -mbogo ® ( Apr 29, 16:24, 2005 ) (342 reads) ( 343 bytes ) thanks for taking the time george (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 01:03, 2005 ) (27 reads) ( 0 bytes ) I got my GMT II from them >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 29, 07:13, 2005 ) (177 reads) ( 81 bytes ) i am looking at two subs there. they are only about 250.00 apart. look the -rickmeister ® ( Apr 29, 07:56, 2005 ) (369 reads) ( 167 bytes ) I'd get the A >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 29, 16:51, 2005 ) (265 reads) ( 64 bytes ) thanks i forgot about that. thanks for answering (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 01:04, 2005 ) (13 reads) ( 0 bytes ) The only 16613 I see is $6500 (nt) -mbogo ® ( Apr 29, 16:38, 2005 ) (132 reads) ( 0 bytes ) klik auction site more come up (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 30, 01:05, 2005 ) (17 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Bond NATO Band - Welded or Stitched? -RJ66 ® ( Apr 27, 20:01, 2005 ) (61 reads) ( 427 bytes ) Check out Howard Marx' site for good selection and outstanding service -jrod ® ( May 01, 08:11, 2005 ) (39 reads) ( 224 bytes ) Check out Howard Marx' site for good selection and outstanding service -jrod ® ( May 01, 08:11, 2005 ) (64 reads) ( 224 bytes ) Check out Howard Marx' site for good selection and outstanding service -jrod ® ( May 01, 08:10, 2005 ) (68 reads) ( 224 bytes ) Re: Bond NATO Band - Welded or Stitched? -slide13 ® ( Apr 28, 02:57, 2005 ) (48 reads) ( 216 bytes )

Rolex service in Co Cal -JMK ® ( Apr 27, 19:33, 2005 ) (70 reads) ( 83 bytes ) RWSC in Beverly Hills (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 27, 21:06, 2005 ) (50 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: RWSC in Beverly Hills -paul brown ® ( Apr 28, 02:53, 2005 ) (42 reads) ( 299 bytes ) Sorry for the above attempt to post, but here's some info . . . -Mort ® ( Apr 28, 05:54, 2005 ) (163 reads) ( 375 bytes ) Follow the packaging instruction >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 28, 16:56, 2005 ) (32 reads) ( 98 bytes ) Call Beverh (nt) -Mort ® ( Apr 28, 05:51, 2005 ) (59 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Daytona screw-in pushers questions -Stuart Stark ® ( Apr 27, 19:09, 2005 ) (117 reads) ( 1531 bytes ) Re: 100 meter water resistance >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 28, 17:02, 2005 ) (38 reads) ( 315 bytes ) Thanks for the information..... -Stuart Stark ® ( Apr 28, 20:47, 2005 ) (186 reads) ( 268 bytes ) Re: Daytona screw-in pushers questions -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 27, 21:12, 2005 ) (31 reads) ( 843 bytes ) Re: Daytona screw-in pushers questions -Stuart Stark ® ( Apr 27, 21:41, 2005 ) (241 reads) ( 739 bytes )

Does anyone have any experience with swissluxury.com? -JohnFlynn ® ( Apr 27, 15:48, 2005 ) (358 reads) ( 305 bytes )

Review Daytona review -Evert ® ( Apr 26, 21:28, 2005 ) (79 reads) ( 72 bytes ) Re: Daytona review -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 26, 23:51, 2005 ) (323 reads) ( 784 bytes )

Fake or Not? description between Rolex lugs? -Byron ® ( Apr 26, 15:35, 2005 ) (91 reads) ( 534 bytes ) Re: description between Rolex lugs? -scottd ® ( Apr 26, 19:32, 2005 ) (88 reads) ( 140 bytes ) Fake or Not? Re: description between Rolex lugs? -Byron ® ( Apr 27, 14:37, 2005 ) (32 reads) ( 315 bytes ) Re: description between Rolex lugs? -robert lacy ® ( Apr 27, 17:29, 2005 ) (136 reads) ( 82 bytes ) Re: description between Rolex lugs? -Byron ® ( Apr 28, 19:11, 2005 ) (114 reads) ( 120 bytes ) Why don't you post some pictures of your watches... -esben buhl ® ( Apr 27, 16:43, 2005 ) (53 reads) ( 205 bytes ) Re: Why don't you post some pictures of your watches... -Byron ® ( Apr 28, 19:23, 2005 ) (22 reads) ( 904 bytes )

Spotted a FAKE! at work today... worn by a "poser" -LTM ® ( Apr 26, 15:12, 2005 ) (429 reads) ( 1180 bytes ) I think fake Vintage is even worse -Clifton ® ( Apr 26, 16:56, 2005 ) (853 reads) ( 1053 bytes ) I agree with you totally, but . . . . -CBB ® ( May 03, 17:40, 2005 ) (432 reads) ( 354 bytes ) Maybe >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 26, 18:01, 2005 ) (522 reads) ( 168 bytes ) Totally agree, but your missing my point -Clifton ® ( Apr 26, 19:15, 2005 ) (144 reads) ( 952 bytes ) Re: Totally agree, but your missing my point -masraum ® ( Apr 30, 03:59, 2005 ) (227 reads) ( 170 bytes ) Lol -Clifton ® ( May 01, 18:30, 2005 ) (22 reads) ( 175 bytes ) Good point... -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 26, 18:16, 2005 ) (304 reads) ( 640 bytes ) That is what I'm talking about.... -Clifton ® ( Apr 26, 19:55, 2005 ) (31 reads) ( 719 bytes ) Re: That is what I'm talking about.... -robert lacy ® ( Apr 27, 17:35, 2005 ) (60 reads) ( 157 bytes ) You can run but you cannot hide. LOL -maverick ® ( Apr 27, 04:54, 2005 ) (48 reads) ( 334 bytes )

Testing your Rolex watch -LOLEXSWISS ® ( Apr 26, 10:46, 2005 ) (110 reads) ( 140 bytes ) Re: Testing your Rolex watch -bsavitz ® ( Apr 26, 20:49, 2005 ) (54 reads) ( 37 bytes ) Re: Testing your Rolex watch -Lorenzo Shepard ® ( Apr 26, 20:37, 2005 ) (158 reads) ( 92 bytes ) Re: Testing your Rolex watch -Dan Pierce ® ( Apr 26, 21:43, 2005 ) (130 reads) ( 23 bytes ) Simple >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 26, 12:39, 2005 ) (35 reads) ( 121 bytes ) I use -maverick ® ( Apr 27, 04:56, 2005 ) (501 reads) ( 48 bytes )

Fake or Not? To the panel please... -watchlvr ® ( Apr 26, 05:57, 2005 ) (188 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: To the panel please... -cmf ® ( Apr 26, 20:40, 2005 ) (753 reads) ( 69 bytes ) Ack! Fake as a 3 dollar bill. (nt) -molex ® ( Apr 26, 20:15, 2005 ) (56 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: To the panel please... -GMF ® ( Apr 26, 13:26, 2005 ) (77 reads) ( 291 bytes ) Dunno..but you can definitely see that laser etched coronet way to easily. (nt) -rissac ® ( Apr 26, 06:00, 2005 ) (382 reads) ( 0 bytes ) The etching could be a result of the light hitting it just right -maverick ® ( Apr 26, 18:03, 2005 ) (140 reads) ( 124 bytes ) Re: The etching could be a result of the light hitting it just right -GMF ® ( Apr 26, 18:17, 2005 ) (369 reads) ( 92 bytes ) Hard to be 100% from the pic -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 26, 18:21, 2005 ) (58 reads) ( 159 bytes ) I'm 100% sure. -molex ® ( Apr 26, 20:20, 2005 ) (70 reads) ( 301 bytes )

pressure-testing -tom k ® ( Apr 26, 04:19, 2005 ) (61 reads) ( 150 bytes ) Sure, why not? >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 26, 15:07, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 231 bytes )

Had to do a pic of YM with something Maui, didn't I ? -randys ® ( Apr 26, 02:36, 2005 ) (752 reads) ( 0 bytes ) where is the gecko (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 26, 04:55, 2005 ) (67 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Great pic Randy! (nt) -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 26, 03:01, 2005 ) (11 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Is YM a more rare find? -sammy3 ® ( Apr 26, 03:50, 2005 ) (50 reads) ( 107 bytes ) Should not be any harder to find than most sport models, I would think. -randys ® ( Apr 27, 03:26, 2005 ) (47 reads) ( 196 bytes ) Re: Should not be any harder to find than most sport models, I would think. -sammy3 ® ( Apr 27, 04:33, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 63 bytes )

Some new pictures... -JH ® ( Apr 25, 22:14, 2005 ) (85 reads) ( 0 bytes )

de-wound watch. still running +4/day -tom k ® ( Apr 25, 22:06, 2005 ) (13 reads) ( 174 bytes ) It is within specs -4,+6 per day. (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 25, 23:51, 2005 ) (18 reads) ( 0 bytes )

New rule in Maui, if you own a Rolex, you MUST wear it in the pool or ocean -randys ® ( Apr 25, 19:14, 2005 ) (243 reads) ( 232 bytes ) Maui no ka oi... -Lavaman ® ( Apr 25, 22:17, 2005 ) (67 reads) ( 735 bytes ) Re: Maui no ka oi... -dkman ® ( Apr 26, 01:58, 2005 ) (160 reads) ( 34 bytes ) Kauai no ka oi, or Maui no ka oi, either way, you gotta love the islands! (nt) -randys ® ( Apr 26, 00:04, 2005 ) (33 reads) ( 0 bytes ) You look pretty comfy there Randy, care if I join LOL >>>>>>>>>>>>>.. -maverick ® ( Apr 25, 19:46, 2005 ) (183 reads) ( 52 bytes )

Fake or Not? Ladies Datejust Bracelet -stanm ® ( Apr 25, 17:14, 2005 ) (143 reads) ( 159 bytes ) Probably an aftermarket bracelet >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 25, 18:47, 2005 ) (17 reads) ( 138 bytes ) thanks for the clarification... (nt) -stanm ® ( Apr 25, 21:03, 2005 ) (88 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Swiss Made or Swiss T<25 on bottom?? -Justin Hanson ® ( Apr 25, 15:38, 2005 ) (222 reads) ( 175 bytes ) Re: Swiss Made or Swiss T<25 on bottom?? -rissac ® ( Apr 25, 18:19, 2005 ) (375 reads) ( 286 bytes ) When did they stop using the t<25? -Justin Hanson ® ( Apr 26, 02:35, 2005 ) (249 reads) ( 44 bytes ) Re: When did they stop using the t<25? -deerya ® ( Apr 26, 12:35, 2005 ) (84 reads) ( 185 bytes ) 1999 (nt) -GMF ® ( Apr 26, 02:47, 2005 ) (60 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Who here owns a Yacht Master? -Justin Hanson ® ( Apr 25, 08:17, 2005 ) (518 reads) ( 78 bytes ) Pics?>>>>>>>>>>>>> -maverick ® ( Apr 25, 19:20, 2005 ) (131 reads) ( 331 bytes ) me -randys ® ( Apr 25, 13:08, 2005 ) (457 reads) ( 0 bytes ) and again -randys ® ( Apr 25, 13:09, 2005 ) (399 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Okay, I'm in!!! -dkman ® ( Apr 25, 18:36, 2005 ) (32 reads) ( 44 bytes ) This is a great shot Randy (nt) -Lyndon ® ( Apr 25, 13:11, 2005 ) (54 reads) ( 0 bytes ) thanks Lyndon, just me and my OTT light (nt) -randys ® ( Apr 25, 21:26, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Does anyone make.... -scottd ® ( Apr 25, 05:46, 2005 ) (34 reads) ( 373 bytes ) Just seen them in Bangkok for about $25 ...... -mike ihnatenko ® ( Apr 27, 17:49, 2005 ) (215 reads) ( 610 bytes ) Yes >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 25, 14:16, 2005 ) (14 reads) ( 87 bytes ) Probably safe but you never know - I have seen an Explorer 1 fake (nt) -Lyndon ® ( Apr 25, 13:36, 2005 ) (20 reads) ( 0 bytes ) i do not think there is an air king faked now but there may have been years ago. -rickmeister ® ( Apr 25, 06:24, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 88 bytes ) faking a $55 (discounted) watch ?!? -arlequin ® ( Apr 26, 00:57, 2005 ) (78 reads) ( 71 bytes ) LOL How true, I would not bet money that you canot find a fake one. (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 25, 07:59, 2005 ) (34 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Emeril's Rolex? -deanjb ® ( Apr 25, 04:59, 2005 ) (178 reads) ( 165 bytes ) Re: Emeril's Rolex? -KentW ® ( Apr 25, 23:57, 2005 ) (149 reads) ( 64 bytes ) It was a DJ the last time I saw his wrist. (nt) -mbogo ® ( Apr 25, 15:28, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Mahalo! -randys ® ( Apr 25, 03:29, 2005 ) (71 reads) ( 431 bytes ) Glad to have you back looks like a great vacation! (nt) -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 26, 03:10, 2005 ) (5 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Mahalo! -Dan Pierce ® ( Apr 25, 13:36, 2005 ) (6 reads) ( 258 bytes ) we go to maui often. i have a condo there at Khei. where did you stay on the -rickmeister ® ( Apr 25, 06:26, 2005 ) (65 reads) ( 102 bytes ) stayed at Royal Lahaina on Kaanapali Beach, just north of Black Rock -randys ® ( Apr 25, 13:06, 2005 ) (9 reads) ( 42 bytes ) next time try for a condo at khei they are cheap and very plush. kamoale sands -rickmeister ® ( Apr 26, 02:51, 2005 ) (5 reads) ( 27 bytes ) Re: Mahalo! -marks ® ( Apr 25, 05:17, 2005 ) (271 reads) ( 1076 bytes )

is the anniversary GMT Master ii LARGER than the current one? -tom k ® ( Apr 25, 00:29, 2005 ) (413 reads) ( 22 bytes ) Yes and no >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 25, 00:49, 2005 ) (70 reads) ( 142 bytes )

Hot or Not? Thoughts on large watch fad... -Lieutenant ® ( Apr 24, 16:53, 2005 ) (171 reads) ( 623 bytes ) Re: Thoughts on large watch fad... -BSavitz ® ( Apr 25, 13:40, 2005 ) (167 reads) ( 658 bytes ) I love my Yacht Master! -Justin Hanson ® ( Apr 25, 07:59, 2005 ) (177 reads) ( 13 bytes ) Re: Thoughts on large watch fad... -deanjb ® ( Apr 25, 05:27, 2005 ) (141 reads) ( 549 bytes ) Well a fad is usually around for a year or two. But large watches have been -rickmeister ® ( Apr 25, 03:19, 2005 ) (64 reads) ( 846 bytes ) Some of it is a fad, but, large watches have been around forever. The first -Randy G ® ( Apr 25, 02:19, 2005 ) (12 reads) ( 637 bytes ) Well I am glad they are making bigger watches... 42mm is about the >>> -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 24, 22:44, 2005 ) (50 reads) ( 719 bytes ) A case of increasingly diminishing returns...> -Sunnie ® ( Apr 24, 21:45, 2005 ) (14 reads) ( 1782 bytes ) Sorry but I must disagree. I have been into LARGE timepieces way before >> -Donald Battles ® ( Apr 24, 19:22, 2005 ) (89 reads) ( 100 bytes ) News That's fine, but >>> -molex ® ( Apr 24, 20:48, 2005 ) (11 reads) ( 1027 bytes ) Say HI to me... -Matt Markis ® ( May 01, 01:08, 2005 ) (6 reads) ( 733 bytes ) Lots of people over 45 wear Panerais and other large watches ... -Veeblefetzer ® ( Apr 25, 05:56, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 124 bytes ) I'm sure you're right... just none that I've ever seen -molex ® ( Apr 25, 17:21, 2005 ) (24 reads) ( 25 bytes ) although he acts like a juvenile CLinton has pannis. (nt) -rickmeister ® ( Apr 25, 02:02, 2005 ) (15 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Oh, and by the way. The post above was more of a "joke" than anything else. (nt) -Donald Battles ® ( Apr 24, 21:30, 2005 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes ) I'd like to ask a honest question. >>>>>>>>>>> -Donald Battles ® ( Apr 24, 21:12, 2005 ) (172 reads) ( 448 bytes ) News Other people wearing faddishly big watches means nothing to me. What does is >> -molex ® ( Apr 25, 17:27, 2005 ) (62 reads) ( 1072 bytes ) The original post:"Thoughts on large watch fad" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>... -maverick ® ( Apr 25, 00:12, 2005 ) (23 reads) ( 391 bytes ) I can!! (nt) -Cooper Thompson ® ( Apr 25, 03:24, 2005 ) (28 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Well, I said its a "status symbol" for most. And that hardly implies >> -Donald Battles ® ( Apr 25, 01:40, 2005 ) (181 reads) ( 623 bytes ) As for my post I stand by what I said. You turned negative and off topic -maverick ® ( Apr 25, 02:14, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 238 bytes ) I doubt "trash Rolex" was intended. There are many reasons why Rolex is not the -roloya ® ( Apr 25, 05:50, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 733 bytes ) i think we can agree though that a hot blond drinking scotch who arrived in a -rickmeister ® ( Apr 25, 06:31, 2005 ) (78 reads) ( 93 bytes ) Personally speaking, I'm not 'bothered' exactly...> -Sunnie ® ( Apr 24, 21:54, 2005 ) (111 reads) ( 550 bytes ) 100% agree, the big watch fad is a dud IMO. Too bad it's got legs. -molex ® ( Apr 24, 18:01, 2005 ) (8 reads) ( 506 bytes ) I am sorry but they are like a big Hummer, way over the top for me-JMHO -maverick ® ( Apr 24, 20:12, 2005 ) (21 reads) ( 252 bytes )

Has anyone seen the movie "The Interpreter"?... -Lieutenant ® ( Apr 24, 16:26, 2005 ) (336 reads) ( 170 bytes ) Sorry but he's just a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Donald Battles ® ( Apr 24, 21:27, 2005 ) (48 reads) ( 89 bytes )

News New watch in the family... -Lieutenant ® ( Apr 24, 16:17, 2005 ) (156 reads) ( 559 bytes ) Re: New watch in the family... -george con ® ( May 01, 03:19, 2005 ) (77 reads) ( 369 bytes ) Looks like the Cartier that JFK wore all the time...beautiful watch. Do they -jrod ® ( Apr 27, 04:57, 2005 ) (26 reads) ( 56 bytes ) Automatic version -Lieutenant ® ( Apr 28, 06:42, 2005 ) (6 reads) ( 95 bytes ) Ah, a discount. one of the advantages of buying other than Rolex -roloya ® ( Apr 25, 05:54, 2005 ) (9 reads) ( 206 bytes ) I LIKE IT! -marks ® ( Apr 24, 17:35, 2005 ) (6 reads) ( 90 bytes )

Black dial TOG pics request -Lavaman ® ( Apr 24, 15:09, 2005 ) (27 reads) ( 262 bytes ) There is a photo of one on Rolex' site (nt) -mbogo ® ( Apr 24, 15:37, 2005 ) (78 reads) ( 0 bytes ) But that one is with the Jubilee... -Lavaman ® ( Apr 24, 16:54, 2005 ) (31 reads) ( 329 bytes )

hi all , does anyone know the difference between the 2004 and 2005 rolex daytona -al358 ® ( Apr 23, 23:26, 2005 ) (357 reads) ( 68 bytes ) never mind I found out the difference (nt) -al358 ® ( Apr 24, 15:21, 2005 ) (128 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: never mind I found out the difference -Steve J ® ( Apr 25, 00:37, 2005 ) (51 reads) ( 228 bytes ) 'Bout $500 dollars... (nt) -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 24, 00:07, 2005 ) (9 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Newbie with a question on etched logo -Peter Sesto ® ( Apr 23, 22:26, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 651 bytes ) Re: Newbie with a question on etched logo -Peter Sesto ® ( Apr 25, 00:46, 2005 ) (184 reads) ( 165 bytes ) Etched coronet >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 23, 22:42, 2005 ) (34 reads) ( 165 bytes ) Re: Etched coronet >>>> -Chris Hoffman ® ( Apr 24, 15:06, 2005 ) (74 reads) ( 233 bytes ) Re: Etched coronet >>>> -paul brown ® ( Apr 24, 18:44, 2005 ) (42 reads) ( 835 bytes ) 2003 >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 24, 19:28, 2005 ) (208 reads) ( 141 bytes ) It depends on what model>>>>>>>> -Jocke ® ( Apr 24, 16:49, 2005 ) (24 reads) ( 188 bytes ) You are right. -GMF ® ( Apr 24, 16:38, 2005 ) (207 reads) ( 31 bytes )

Who is located in the GTA? -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 23, 18:58, 2005 ) (155 reads) ( 56 bytes )

Changing of date at midnight -Jeff Klott ® ( Apr 23, 05:57, 2005 ) (237 reads) ( 208 bytes ) Usually a few minites after midnight. -maverick ® ( Apr 23, 18:12, 2005 ) (10 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Toronto Get Together tonight met Sammy3 >>> -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 23, 04:59, 2005 ) (119 reads) ( 1149 bytes ) Patrick, thanks for advertising my name for me!!! -sammy3 ® ( Apr 23, 20:03, 2005 ) (18 reads) ( 78 bytes ) Toronto??? -stanm ® ( Apr 23, 07:49, 2005 ) (6 reads) ( 55 bytes ) I will have to e-mail you for the next one >>> -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 23, 16:21, 2005 ) (14 reads) ( 368 bytes ) Re: I will have to e-mail you for the next one >>> -stanm ® ( Apr 23, 19:55, 2005 ) (4 reads) ( 86 bytes )

Date Versus Datejust??? -henri ® ( Apr 23, 01:41, 2005 ) (808 reads) ( 219 bytes ) Re: Date Versus Datejust??? -David Lesko ® ( Apr 23, 01:53, 2005 ) (66 reads) ( 283 bytes ) Re: Date Versus Datejust??? -henri ® ( Apr 23, 01:55, 2005 ) (58 reads) ( 7 bytes )

Sub Bezels? -jwalker497 ® ( Apr 23, 01:22, 2005 ) (397 reads) ( 203 bytes )

Submariner green bezel question... -trickymicky ® ( Apr 22, 23:02, 2005 ) (58 reads) ( 493 bytes ) Re: Submariner green bezel question... -RJ66 ® ( Apr 23, 02:50, 2005 ) (104 reads) ( 150 bytes ) Assuming you are in the US expect to pay MSRP @ ~$4.8k -Clifton ® ( Apr 23, 00:25, 2005 ) (100 reads) ( 251 bytes ) Thanks ! (nt) -trickymicky ® ( Apr 23, 04:02, 2005 ) (36 reads) ( 0 bytes ) 4525$$ but I go one in the bahamas for 4225, -jimand7 ® ( Apr 23, 15:35, 2005 ) (89 reads) ( 486 bytes )

oyster perpetual -Ann Hennigan ® ( Apr 22, 20:23, 2005 ) (127 reads) ( 523 bytes ) "found"+ "rummage sale"+"gold plating" = cheap fake. Good luck. (nt) -molex ® ( Apr 23, 02:34, 2005 ) (45 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Is the battery dead too? (nt) -leewmeister ® ( Apr 22, 22:39, 2005 ) (12 reads) ( 0 bytes ) If the 'plating' is wearing off, the bracelet isn't real -mbogo ® ( Apr 22, 22:34, 2005 ) (332 reads) ( 52 bytes ) It's probably a real watch with a real bracelet >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 22, 23:45, 2005 ) (73 reads) ( 90 bytes ) Gold plating??? (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 22, 22:32, 2005 ) (159 reads) ( 0 bytes )

watch picking up seconds -tom k ® ( Apr 22, 16:46, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 192 bytes ) Well, that's better than picking up thirds and fourths >> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 22, 17:37, 2005 ) (163 reads) ( 300 bytes ) Re: Well, that's better than picking up thirds and fourths >> -tom k ® ( Apr 22, 19:06, 2005 ) (8 reads) ( 133 bytes ) Improbable >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 22, 19:56, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 334 bytes )

Watch winder -RGSP ® ( Apr 22, 15:11, 2005 ) (457 reads) ( 272 bytes ) Should be fine... -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 22, 17:33, 2005 ) (60 reads) ( 293 bytes ) Re: Should be fine... -RGSP ® ( Apr 23, 14:51, 2005 ) (13 reads) ( 26 bytes ) Harwood is credited >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 22, 17:47, 2005 ) (13 reads) ( 141 bytes ) Rest easy >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 22, 16:04, 2005 ) (37 reads) ( 650 bytes ) Re: Rest easy >>> -RGSP ® ( Apr 22, 16:16, 2005 ) (127 reads) ( 70 bytes )

Information wanted on cheapest place to buy a new Rolex Sub in the UK -David Hopwood ® ( Apr 22, 12:38, 2005 ) (159 reads) ( 290 bytes ) Re: Information wanted on cheapest place to buy a new Rolex Sub in the UK -mr_nice ® ( Apr 22, 13:18, 2005 ) (37 reads) ( 360 bytes ) Re: Information wanted on cheapest place to buy a new Rolex Sub in the UK -T.T ® ( Apr 22, 21:16, 2005 ) (76 reads) ( 616 bytes ) THANKS -David Hopwood ® ( Apr 22, 15:49, 2005 ) (114 reads) ( 91 bytes )

Hot or Not? Opinion please - SD on shark -frankier ® ( Apr 22, 12:17, 2005 ) (40 reads) ( 130 bytes ) I like it a lot!!! Very nice!! Can you let me know type of strap and where to -jrod ® ( Apr 23, 06:39, 2005 ) (18 reads) ( 73 bytes ) Check your email (nt) -frankier ® ( Apr 23, 16:46, 2005 ) (29 reads) ( 0 bytes ) It looks good but I always >>> -Patrick Colpron ® ( Apr 23, 05:31, 2005 ) (29 reads) ( 49 bytes ) I always like a SD/Sub on a black strap -- classy and sporty! (nt) -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 22, 17:34, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 0 bytes ) I like it. (nt) -GMF ® ( Apr 22, 16:26, 2005 ) (40 reads) ( 0 bytes ) SD on shark - Looks Good (nt) -Lyndon ® ( Apr 22, 13:51, 2005 ) (14 reads) ( 0 bytes )

2002 GMT Master II accuracy question -Lorenzo Shepard ® ( Apr 21, 18:11, 2005 ) (102 reads) ( 566 bytes ) I've had 4 different GMTs -- yours is just fine! Its not quartz after all! (nt) -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 22, 17:36, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: 2002 GMT Master II accuracy question -peter74 ® ( Apr 22, 09:46, 2005 ) (58 reads) ( 124 bytes ) There is nothing wrong with your watch >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 18:29, 2005 ) (21 reads) ( 152 bytes ) Re: There is nothing wrong with your watch >>>> -Lorenzo Shepard ® ( Apr 21, 18:51, 2005 ) (18 reads) ( 350 bytes )

News Downtime tonight >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 15:59, 2005 ) (150 reads) ( 190 bytes ) Sorry, it took appr. 3 and a half hours. (nt) -Ernie Romers ® ( Apr 22, 06:31, 2005 ) (4 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Is My Sub 16610 in limits ?? -mr_nice ® ( Apr 21, 13:22, 2005 ) (108 reads) ( 351 bytes ) Thanks Guys -mr_nice ® ( Apr 22, 13:21, 2005 ) (151 reads) ( 11 bytes ) Normal -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 13:51, 2005 ) (220 reads) ( 322 bytes ) Re: Normal -Jeff Klott ® ( Apr 23, 05:46, 2005 ) (35 reads) ( 261 bytes ) It's within COSC specs but... -BSavitz ® ( Apr 22, 13:24, 2005 ) (155 reads) ( 183 bytes ) The COSC requirements are +6/-4 sec per day. (nt) -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 18:31, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Yeah what GMF said....thanks! (nt) -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 21:08, 2005 ) (24 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Faulty Tudor? -JRQ ® ( Apr 21, 12:51, 2005 ) (172 reads) ( 633 bytes ) Re: Faulty Tudor? -Scott Grady ® ( May 06, 17:54, 2005 ) (56 reads) ( 389 bytes ) I sent you the link to a Tudor forum becasue of the difference in movements -maverick ® ( Apr 21, 22:12, 2005 ) (22 reads) ( 165 bytes )

New Rolex with Red Date -skypipe ® ( Apr 21, 03:21, 2005 ) (105 reads) ( 199 bytes ) Alternating red and black >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 05:22, 2005 ) (44 reads) ( 123 bytes ) The new style Datejust (non-S/S) have had alternating red/black since ~NOV 04. -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 13:44, 2005 ) (15 reads) ( 116 bytes ) Are you sure? -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 16:36, 2005 ) (19 reads) ( 340 bytes ) Certain - Last Oct-Nov I was window shopping for the new TOGs -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 21:06, 2005 ) (102 reads) ( 953 bytes ) Sorry pressed the wrong button !! -SkyPipe ® ( Apr 23, 08:29, 2005 ) (6 reads) ( 164 bytes ) Just checked my dealer brochure dated 0ct 2004 -Clifton ® ( Apr 22, 02:30, 2005 ) (105 reads) ( 344 bytes ) You mean like this one? -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 03:50, 2005 ) (32 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Yep this is correct ! Sorry I mean "second" hand and not minute hand. (nt) -SkyPipe ® ( Apr 21, 14:36, 2005 ) (16 reads) ( 0 bytes )

Fake or Not? Refresher course: What's wrong with this Daytona? -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 02:42, 2005 ) (1499 reads) ( 389 bytes ) Any follow-up as to what happened? -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 14:25, 2005 ) (53 reads) ( 152 bytes ) I saw the same thing you did GMF... But I guess you already posted it -YurRomeo1 ® ( Apr 21, 05:34, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 189 bytes ) What jumped out at me >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 04:22, 2005 ) (481 reads) ( 424 bytes ) Registers sitting even with crown @ 9 & 3. Indicates movement other than 4130. (nt) -Clifton ® ( Apr 21, 03:47, 2005 ) (8 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Two big things... -WilliamsGPE ® ( Apr 21, 03:46, 2005 ) (18 reads) ( 423 bytes ) Subdials too close to the hour marker (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 21, 03:02, 2005 ) (97 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Aw, you can do better than that >>>> -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 03:08, 2005 ) (14 reads) ( 67 bytes ) Wow, this is too fake to be a fake. -sammy3 ® ( Apr 21, 04:31, 2005 ) (20 reads) ( 189 bytes ) The sub-dial at 9 o'clock is set to 6 instead of 12. (nt) -mbogo ® ( Apr 21, 03:45, 2005 ) (15 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Hey, I was correct, even if I did not give a detailed reason. I also -maverick ® ( Apr 21, 04:52, 2005 ) (18 reads) ( 131 bytes )

Re: Gold Datejust -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 01:46, 2005 ) (67 reads) ( 143 bytes ) Re: Gold Datejust -Chris Hoffman ® ( Apr 23, 04:28, 2005 ) (33 reads) ( 175 bytes )

My Submariner collection with GMT II -Lon ® ( Apr 21, 00:14, 2005 ) (63 reads) ( 27 bytes ) Nice but??? -Jeff Klott ® ( Apr 23, 05:52, 2005 ) (327 reads) ( 222 bytes ) Nice. (nt) -GMF ® ( Apr 21, 05:23, 2005 ) (158 reads) ( 0 bytes )

GMT 16713 Setting Problem -Joe Donahue ® ( Apr 20, 18:21, 2005 ) (270 reads) ( 376 bytes ) While the keyless works are generally pretty >>> -Dave Knoll ® ( Apr 20, 21:07, 2005 ) (21 reads) ( 451 bytes ) Translation: Send it to Rolex for service -Clifton ® ( Apr 20, 22:55, 2005 ) (7 reads) ( 218 bytes )

Does this look legit? -Ihsaan Hussain ® ( Apr 20, 18:03, 2005 ) (52 reads) ( 308 bytes ) Re: Does this look legit? -Ryan Bridgman ® ( Apr 20, 18:58, 2005 ) (22 reads) ( 404 bytes ) Green sub looks > Green GMT -applerepublic ® ( Apr 21, 01:02, 2005 ) (21 reads) ( 23 bytes ) News You definitely need better pictures. It looks like a very nice watch, from what -maverick ® ( Apr 21, 08:30, 2005 ) (39 reads) ( 10 bytes )

Did D. Eisenhower wear a DJ with the new Presidential braceelet? (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 20, 16:49, 2005 ) (43 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Did D. Eisenhower wear a DJ with the new Presidential braceelet? -arlequin ® ( Apr 21, 01:00, 2005 ) (30 reads) ( 88 bytes ) I did not make myself plain, I have heard this disputed and I seem to>>>>>> -maverick ® ( Apr 21, 01:12, 2005 ) (113 reads) ( 353 bytes ) Does NO ONE know the answer to this??????????????????????????????? (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 20, 21:38, 2005 ) (3 reads) ( 0 bytes )

I am Thinking of a Zephyr Purchase and Need Help -CSIII ® ( Apr 20, 04:09, 2005 ) (29 reads) ( 438 bytes )

anyone here in Vancouver,BC<canada -cmf ® ( Apr 20, 01:56, 2005 ) (42 reads) ( 144 bytes ) Re: anyone here in Vancouver,BC<canada -pmar124 ® ( Apr 22, 03:51, 2005 ) (85 reads) ( 425 bytes )

GMT II Magnetised !! (long) -skypipe ® ( Apr 20, 01:50, 2005 ) (91 reads) ( 759 bytes ) Interesting -tzjm ® ( Apr 20, 04:45, 2005 ) (298 reads) ( 982 bytes ) All Rolexes anti-magnetic? -rissac ® ( Apr 20, 04:15, 2005 ) (310 reads) ( 208 bytes ) A degauss wand is easy to find but I have not used one on a watch>>>>>>>>> -maverick ® ( Apr 20, 02:14, 2005 ) (42 reads) ( 64 bytes )

stolen -paul hoffmann ® ( Apr 19, 22:40, 2005 ) (162 reads) ( 167 bytes ) How did you purchase the watch?... -Lieutenant ® ( Apr 21, 04:06, 2005 ) (123 reads) ( 84 bytes ) You need one of these>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -maverick ® ( Apr 20, 16:41, 2005 ) (64 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Or better yet .... one of these -rissac ® ( Apr 20, 17:26, 2005 ) (656 reads) ( 0 bytes ) Re: stolen -Stef88 ® ( Apr 20, 05:47, 2005 ) (107 reads) ( 764 bytes ) Re: stolen -RJ66 ® ( Apr 20, 00:30, 2005 ) (79 reads) ( 170 bytes ) Re: stolen -paul hoffmann ® ( Apr 20, 01:09, 2005 ) (32 reads) ( 16 bytes ) Re: stolen -paul brown ® ( Apr 20, 02:55, 2005 ) (146 reads) ( 266 bytes ) Re: stolen -RJ66 ® ( Apr 20, 01:16, 2005 ) (70 reads) ( 279 bytes ) dont forget to post on the watch deals report forum under stolen watches (nt) -watch-man7777 ® ( Apr 19, 23:56, 2005 ) (180 reads) ( 0 bytes )

How should I get the perfect light?>>>>>>>>>> -Jocke ® ( Apr 19, 21:50, 2005 ) (150 reads) ( 91 bytes ) Re: How should I get the perfect light?>>>>>>>>>> -thesharkman ® ( Apr 20, 05:02, 2005 ) (215 reads) ( 55 bytes ) Re: How should I get the perfect light?>>>>>>>>>> -maverick ® ( Apr 19, 22:47, 2005 ) (197 reads) ( 378 bytes ) Hard to get much better that what you have ) (nt) -maverick ® ( Apr 20, 00:45, 2005 ) (10 reads) ( 0 bytes )