Is tritium brighter than something like Superluminova or Lumibrite? I've never seen tritium in person.
I don't think that there is any doubt of which is brighter (lumed dial) or which maintains it brightness longer (tritium). What I don't understand is why manufacturers haven't designed any watches with both tubes and a lumed dial. It seems like such an easy fix that would provide the bright pop after a sunlight charge as well as the glow power of tritium.
Each has it's good and bad points
1) Tritium tube watch best for putting on at bedtime especially if you are nearsighted and have no hope of seeing the alarm clock face
2) Your best conventional lume watch for indoor rides with kids at Disneyland and such !
If you haven't had a Ball you're missing the top end reference point. Not even close.
That used to be true. Deep Blue has a few T-100 tritium watches that exceed the Ball. I know it's not true T-100 but the brightness is off the chart. For a lot less money. The Ball is however a far superior watch in every other area
No one to date has had their tritium tubes replaced because of fading. Non-issue. It's a easy dial,hand replacement if needed. Also what you need to know about tritium is it looses half it's life in 25 years..not blacked out. Then in another 25 years it loses half again, so theoretically in 50 years you should still have some light.And what are you going to do with your $2000 Ball when the tritium needs to be replaced? Head over the the tritium store, Tritium R Us, and get some more?
Each has it's good and bad points
1) Tritium tube watch best for putting on at bedtime especially if you are nearsighted and have no hope of seeing the alarm clock face
2) Your best conventional lume watch for indoor rides with kids at Disneyland and such !
If you haven't had a Ball you're missing the top end reference point. Not even close.
That used to be true. Deep Blue has a few T-100 tritium watches that exceed the Ball. I know it's not true T-100 but the brightness is off the chart. For a lot less money. The Ball is however a far superior watch in every other area
Every case, no pun intended, is different. I have 15 tubes on my Ball Deep Quest and it's a 4,000.00 dollar watch.Here ya go, not to cheap. Found some pricing on those replacements.
Before I decided to jump on my Ball Engineer Hydrocarbon Spacemaster Orbital, I had to check out all the fees for servicing the watch.
I went to the official Ball service center, and was quoted the following prices in Ringgit Malaysia (RM).
Exchange Rate: USD$1.00 = RM3.20
Service: RM1100
Tritium Tube Replacement: RM35 per Tritium Tube
Polishing (Metal Strap): RM350
I was told, people usually replace their tubes after 10-15 years, because it won't be as bright as it initially was ... Half-life of Tritium is believed to be at 12 years ...
For now, my watch has 52 tubes, and the cost to replace all is 52*RM35 = RM1820 (approx. USD$570) ... with servicing and polishing ... over USD$1000+ ... Wouldn't it be better to purchase a brand new watch?
My understanding is that Chromalight is Rolex's name for their blue version of SuperLuminova. C3 SuperLuminova is generally about the same performance as Seiko's Lumibrite. Where Seikos outperform is in the sheer amount of lume they put on watches like the Monster which yield comparatively better head to head lume test results.How does Chromalight do against Seiko's lumibrite? Is it true that Chromalight is superior among lume? Thanks in advance.
A couple of others would be Traser (various models):I've seen a few watches using Tritium mentioned in this thread; Luminox, Ball, Deep Blue, Casio. Are there any others worth looking at?
Vostok uses it too... along with a few others.A couple of others would be Traser (various models):
![]()
Dievas (various models):
![]()
Marathon (TSAR, GSAR, CSAR):
![]()
HTH
The kid has got a point.:-dI prefer super luminova over tritium... A fully charge SL can easily last thru out the nite, although it last few hrs is not as bright as initial but still can be spottted easily in nite.
View attachment 674293
Tritium will have no changes but is always the boring small fine straight line and is SO SMALL...
Irrespective of Marathon's claim, their Maraglo is not as bright or long lasting as C3 Superluminova or Lumibrite.Marathon is now using a lume called MaraGlo, does anyone know anything about it? They claim it glows better than any other non-radioactive lume treatment.
I know you're joking, but Indiglo is electroluminescent and therefore not part of this game. ;-)Phaag....
Timex Indiglo is the brightest...
Hey, no one said photoluminescent or radioluminescent.....
Not quite right, the tritium will decay at a rate of 12.3 yrs and so on.No one to date has had their tritium tubes replaced because of fading. Non-issue. It's a easy dial,hand replacement if needed. Also what you need to know about tritium is it looses half it's life in 25 years..not blacked out. Then in another 25 years it loses half again, so theoretically in 50 years you should still have some light.
I bought my Ball Deep Quest specifically for the tritium. Worth every penny. I have a tsar that I wore for 3-4 years and once you go tritium..well it's difficult to leave.
Also on the super lume doesn't the paint fade after awhile? Age attacks everything right? So with that reasoning Lume is far from perfect either. Proven fact for me is I have a late 70's Rolex,....lume is over on it. Non existent.
Shane