The crown is... a semi big deal.
It seems that it's gotten bigger, more prominent - literally and figuratively -- in our time.
I know some even have a fetish for it: they want it signed, lumed, knurled, made (even) bigger, etc etc.
And then, there is the whole crown GUARD thing, with PANERAI making it its trademark with its design.
(I've always preferred the ANONIMO solution myself, locating it at 6. )
Anyway...
What used to bother me -- tiny, tucked crown - is now appealing. I came to this conclusion after playing around with some Omega-imitating Seiko 5's made 20 - 30 yrs ago.
So, was this a 60's thing - tucking the crown in, to make it as unobtrusive as possible?
Why is it no longer done?
Here are some random examples:
ETERNA
CERTINA:
OMEGA:
PATEK:
SEIKO 5:
It seems that it's gotten bigger, more prominent - literally and figuratively -- in our time.
I know some even have a fetish for it: they want it signed, lumed, knurled, made (even) bigger, etc etc.
And then, there is the whole crown GUARD thing, with PANERAI making it its trademark with its design.
(I've always preferred the ANONIMO solution myself, locating it at 6. )
Anyway...
What used to bother me -- tiny, tucked crown - is now appealing. I came to this conclusion after playing around with some Omega-imitating Seiko 5's made 20 - 30 yrs ago.
So, was this a 60's thing - tucking the crown in, to make it as unobtrusive as possible?
Why is it no longer done?
Here are some random examples:
ETERNA
CERTINA:
OMEGA:
PATEK:
SEIKO 5: