No, we won't explain what it makes it obviously fake. This is not a venue for helping people make better fake watches.
I can see your point here, but I can also imagine that the OP might be more willing to accept an opinion if there was more to it than a simple pronouncement: if all it takes to determine the truth or falseness of a proposition is the act of someone say so, it sure seems that we could dissolve our Court system and just hire someone to tell us what we need to know.
Indeed, it seems to me that we do ourselves a disservice in this type of analysis if we cannot at least present some, objective evidence in support of what we're saying. Simply saying something about a watch's authenticity is a decent start...now ( don't you think...) the OP might appreciate hearing something a bit more persuasive.
Michael.