:rodekaart Don't. Apologize that is. Especially when your photos (and subject) are as beautiful as these |>Ken G said:(apologies for the multiple shots)
Thanks for the kind words Appreciate it.Just from memory, I'd say the case of this one is very similar to your Cosmic 2000 (although the latter has a "bezel"). Could you, at some point, show these side-by-side?
Thanks for that, Ken |>Ken G said:This pic isn't strictly a side-by-side shot, but I think it compares the cases quite well
Yup - you did remember very well. Shorter and thicker is spot on (excuse the poor lighting):Thanks for that, Ken |>
This compilation fits the bill. I remembered well, but these photos also highlight subtle differences. The 176.007 seems a little bit shorter and thicker, almost "chunkier" (in a good way).
Both are gorgeous watches, very nice indeed.