WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Good day, I recently inherited my grandfathers Oysterdate Precision.

I've been spending a lot of time just admiring it and relishing in it's history. I never got to meet my dad's parents, they both passed away when he was 8 and my dad was pretty much raised an orphan. It's amazing he managed to keep the watch all these years. He's worn it all his life almost daily and due to health he's pretty much home bound and stopped wearing watches. And so it happens, it was the right time to hand it down to me.

I've been scouring the internet trying to find out more information on the piece. I've found similar ones with the same ref , but I haven't been able to find any images online with this particular dial. Is there a chance this could be a redial?
I'm not concerned at all with the value of the watch, it's the story and history that's important to me.
So i thought I'd reach out here to see if anyone could help me with any information on the watch.

Ref: 6094
S/N: 7430xx

Thank You in advance :)
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
449 Posts
The dial looks original to me. Just beautiful!

The hands look to be service replacements. The crystal too, obviously. Any pictures of the crown or movement?

Lovely watch.


Sent from my cracked, broken hand wound phone. IG @morning_tundra
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
257 Posts
Dial looks good to me, even has the lume plots signs on it (or what's left of them). Hands are probably a replacement and I'm not totally sure about the date wheel, the font is not the typical one that can be found on those watches but I can be totally wrong on that :)
Beautiful 1961 watch nonetheless
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Dial looks good to me, even has the lume plots signs on it (or what's left of them). Hands are probably a replacement and I'm not totally sure about the date wheel, the font is not the typical one that can be found on those watches but I can be totally wrong on that :)
Beautiful 1961 watch nonetheless
Wow, I never noticed the lume plots until you pointed them out. It's so subtle under the patina (most likely from years of tropical humidity damage). Thanks for pointing it out.


The dial looks original to me. Just beautiful!
The hands look to be service replacements. The crystal too, obviously. Any pictures of the crown or movement?
I know it may be blasphemous to some, but as for the crystal I did take some polywatch to it, but I suppose it's very likely a replacement. I also did give the case a light polish with a tiny piece of cape cod just to get rid of years of gunk and grime and return some sparkle.

I don't have the means to open up the case to have a look at the movement.
Here are some images of the crown and the state of the watch before I cleaned it up.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
257 Posts
Crown is definitely correct :)
Also, using polywatch is no big deal at all, removing small scrathches is totally fine imho. That said, fitting a new glass is probably recommended anyway because it would prevent any sort of humidity & dust leak inside the watch. Those crystal's edges look a bit tired. I don't know the last time it was serviced but a good clean and oiling of the movement would be the best choice in order to prevent any damage that might occur while wearing the watch after X years since the last service. If you are going to have it serviced, you might even change the crystal and have the watchmaker to snap some pics of the inner part of the caseback and of the movement. He might even source the right hands for your watch and dig a bit more into that date wheel (which I still cannot relate to any Oysterdate but as I said it might be just my limited knowledge :) )
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
449 Posts
I'm pretty sure the acrylic crystals had a cyclops originally (all mine from this period do). I'm wondering if this is what makes the date font look a little off? There is variety in date wheel fonts from this period and I think yours looks plenty good enough for the character of the watch.

The hands would be "alpha" or "sword" style, with tritium lume and matching color to the hour markers (gold). Sets can be found on Ebay for under $100. You'll need to know the calibre to be sure to find a set that fits (1215 or 1225 I'm guessing). If you have a set, they're inexpensive to replace.

The Super Oyster crown is pretty unusual. They're less than "waterproof" and have commonly been replaced during service. I'd definitely plan to keep it and just avoid getting it too wet.

Lovely watch. As recommended above, definitely recommend having it carefully serviced by a Vintage Specialist.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
257 Posts
I'm pretty sure the acrylic crystals had a cyclops originally (all mine from this period do). I'm wondering if this is what makes the date font look a little off? There is variety in date wheel fonts from this period and I think yours looks plenty good enough for the character of the watch.

The hands would be "alpha" or "sword" style, with tritium lume and matching color to the hour markers (gold). Sets can be found on Ebay for under $100. You'll need to know the calibre to be sure to find a set that fits (1215 or 1225 I'm guessing). If you have a set, they're inexpensive to replace.

The Super Oyster crown is pretty unusual. They're less than "waterproof" and have commonly been replaced during service. I'd definitely plan to keep it and just avoid getting it too wet.

Lovely watch. As recommended above, definitely recommend having it carefully serviced by a Vintage Specialist.
Good to know that the Super Oyster crown is a common replacement, I've seen more than one 6094 with that same crown instead of the classic underlined Rolex crown and that makes a lot of sense. Also, seems like quite a few 6094s came without cyclops, especially the ones without the gilt frame on the date window. But then again, seems like you own more than one so I trust your reasonable pov :)
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top