[mcfr]

I'm afraid that you won't be the only one Mike! :-(

Indeed, i'm out too, sorry, but i think the starting price is too much and only can more so....

 

[lukeaar]

I've had a think about it as well... The starting price is too much for me. I'm going to have to pull out.

 

[hanz079]

Wow... USD2200 is a little too much frm what I can afford at the moment...
Sorry but I will have to drop out.
A million apologies...

 

[brainless]

I will stay here.
At least for a while and to see what will happen in the process going further on,


Volker ;-)

 

[TIMEangel]

I am giving this a pass. Thanks

 

[Piccolo8]

I will stay in until the vote and the design discussion end up with usage of cases other than Laco 1969, or immediately be out if the vote end up with W-SS dial.

 

[marinerider]

Please put my name on for the time being. See how does it go.

marinerider

 

[Chris Burruss]

I would like to see where this goes. I am in for now.

Chris

 

[nothenorm]

Sorry I have to pass at this kind of price, unless there is changes (Crossing my Fingers)!!!

But a big thank you to Laco and Uwe for the offer nonetheless. Wish you success for this project. Cheers : )

 

[boeing767]

I'm out, thats above my budget I want to spent

 

[JohnF]

Hi -

I'm out as well, as I already have a B watch from Laco and this movement isn't the right one for a B. Best of luck!

Sent from my Milestone using Tapatalk

 

[MHe225]

+1 :-(

Meaning that I'm out of the project. The winning design with the old Durowe movement does not justify the price proposition - at least not in my book; your view may differ. Sorry.

As a side note: I wonder how many people have read -and understand- how the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system actually works. It got me a bit confused and applying a more simplistic logic (1st choice gets 4 points, 2nd choice 3, 3rd choice 2 and 4th choice 1) would give a different winner (Artillery) and I bet this is the system that most people had in mind when casting their votes.
Anyway, it was fun to be part of this for a short while and I will definitely keep an eye on future developments and the final product. Good luck!

RonB

 

[army-av-8-tor]

Count me in please
Thanks

 

[Janne]

It is not the B-uhr style that won.
It is the Artillery (with the inverted numerals) style!

 

[JohnF]

It is not the B-uhr style that won.
It is the Artillery (with the inverted numerals) style!

Hmmm...somehow I thought I saw B.

Still out: the movement and watch type don't match for me...

 

[TaiTam]

At this price point please take my name off the list.

 

[macct]

I would like to be added, albeit depending on the design and price. Thank you. David (macct)

I am bowing out. The appeal of the project was the movement. While the dial choice is okay, a small movement in a big case needs to be hidden which IMO defeats the use of a NOS movement.

 

[lukeaar]

I'm back in if we end up using the (cheaper) ETA!

 

[rooney]

I recently discovered this forum as I was doing some research on Laco.

I know I'm a bit late to the party, but if it is still possible, I'm in. I wish I'd discovered this a bit earlier, but as I like most of the decisions that have already been made I'm really excited. :-!

 

[wombinolatino]

count me in if space