WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner
41 - 60 of 257 Posts
Discussion starter · #41 ·
You're correct, the serial does point to 1945. Quite a lovely two-tone dial. The case is chrome-plated (as indicated by the "fond acier inoxydable", which means "stainless steel back").

The movement is a Doxa-modified ETA 930 (or a derivative thereof) with an indirectly driven sweep second.
 
Hi All,

I recently came across this excellent thread. Firstly, thanks for the info!

I thought I'd post some pics of a Doxa I picked up a while ago. The only other similar example I have found is from a US seller on chrono24 and vastly overpriced. His has a red seconds hand (perhaps mine once did too?).

Anyway, it's a stainless case and the serial seems to date it to 1946. Somewhat over polished I suspect, though it's hard to tell when I don't know what shape the case should be! It's the dial that attracted me anyway :)

Anyone own / seen one like this?

Pics follow (sorry - iphone):
 
Discussion starter · #44 ·
Haven't seen that dial before, but it is really good-looking. IMO, the watch is OK. Yes, looks like it was polished, but long ago - and not badly, as the edges aren't in that bad a shape. Maybe save for the inner bottom edges of the lugs, they look somewhat worse than the rest of the case.

The movement is an ETA 1080, with a Doxa-modified train bridge and a period-correct Shock-Resist device.
 
Two more vintage Doxa-s. The first, a 1950's wristwatch in steel, with automatic movement (Unfortunately I don't have the special polygonal key to open the back) and the second, a 1940's pocket watch which houses an unusual movement (at least for Doxa, this is the only example I've seen), with Nautilus microregulator and something they call "superior adjustment", doesn't say in how many positions...





 
Discussion starter · #47 ·
Concerning the automatic one, it dates to 1955, as indicated by the serial. If it's a bumper, the movement is likely by A. Schild.

As to the PW, I did see that movement a number of times before. The maker of the movement was a subject of a debate, and most likely candidates appeared to be FHF and Aurore-Villeret, but in the end, if I recall correctly, it was identified as an ebauche by Venus, modified by Doxa. I haven't seen it with anything else than an ordinary regulator, though, and certainly not with the nautilus regulator (also known as cam-disk regulator).
 
Thank you for the info! Even if I can't open the case back on the wristwatch, I actually know what movement it contains, because I've had this model once before, it was in quite a used state and I could look inside, the back was badly scratched anyway. The movement is an AS 1361 (not bumper).
 
Hi, I just inherited a DOXA watch from my grandmother, and was wondering about it’s value. It’s a pink gold 14k women’s wrist watch. It has a 6 digit serial number: 901570. I attached some photos for you to evaluate. I was hoping to know when was it produced and what’s the estimated value of it. (I’m not a watch fan so I could really use your help here)
 

Attachments

Discussion starter · #51 ·
Style-wise, I'd say it's from mid to late 1950s. Since it's a gold case, the serial is a dead end. The dial has been repainted in the past (the font quality isn't up to Doxa standards, the subdial crosshair is off-centre). That said, the monetary value will be simply the sum of the values of movement parts, and the value of gold used for the case and bracelet.
Since you have inherited it, I'd advise not to care about monetary value, as the piece is of sentimental value. So, can one really put a price on matters of sentiment?
 
Hi,

I have a Doxa that my mother gave to my father when they were married in 1947. It is a solid gold case. The back has no marking on it other than the number 854798 (on the side where the 9 would be on the front).

The front has only one numeral on it--12. Everything else is dotted, except for the 3, 6, and 9 spots, which have thin rounded teardrop shapes. It has a second hand. The minutes are marked off in little lines, and there is a number after five of those lines ---i.e. 5, 10, 15, etc. The "D" in Doxa is very slightly larger. Underneath the word Doxa is the words ANTI-MAGNETIC--also in all caps and in a smaller font than the word Doxa. At the bottom of the watch, in very small letters, it says "SWISS MADE".

The band is also gold.

Can anyone tell me more about this watch?

Thank you.

--Moshe
 
Discussion starter · #53 ·
Hi,

I have a Doxa that my mother gave to my father when they were married in 1947. It is a solid gold case. The back has no marking on it other than the number 854798 (on the side where the 9 would be on the front).

The front has only one numeral on it--12. Everything else is dotted, except for the 3, 6, and 9 spots, which have thin rounded teardrop shapes. It has a second hand. The minutes are marked off in little lines, and there is a number after five of those lines ---i.e. 5, 10, 15, etc. The "D" in Doxa is very slightly larger. Underneath the word Doxa is the words ANTI-MAGNETIC--also in all caps and in a smaller font than the word Doxa. At the bottom of the watch, in very small letters, it says "SWISS MADE".

The band is also gold.

Can anyone tell me more about this watch?

Thank you.

--Moshe
If you want any thoughts on the dial, movement and condition, then without pictures, not really. Sharp and clear pics of the dial, movement, and inner side of the case back will be necessary. Obviously, the year of production is roughly known, as you know when the watch was bought. Could have been made a year earlier, but since the serials for gold cases aren't documented, 1947 is the only year to which the watch can be dated.

I certainly know the dial type you are referring to. Here's mine, in a chrome-plated case, from 1950:


The Anti-Magnetic inscription was used on dials of watches intended for the markets of Great Britain and its overseas territories/dominions, and the US market. Doxas sold anywhere else were signed "Anti-Magnetique."

Concerning watches with that dial style, they were introduced somewhere in the mid 1940s, and discontinued in the mid 1950s. They came on watches in a variety of sizes (from 32 to 38mm), spanning from the lower end of Doxa's offer (chrome-plated cases, hand-wound, non-shockproof) up to the solid gold bumper (later also rotor) automatic ones. It was a very popular dial style back then, used by a variety of brands, notably by Tissot.
 
Looking for some help in identifying a vintage Doxa watch I have.
Here is what I know, the watch is from 1945 (caseback), is 36 mm w/o crown and 43 mm lug to lug and has a stainless steel back.
The movement i believe is a Doxa 14 as shown on Ranfft.
I believe the watch to be fully original bar the hands possiblyl being changed/relumed and potentially a new crown.

The issue is however I don't know what the case material is for this watch. The watch is marked as antimagnetic and originally came with a soft iron dust cap which has been lost through time.
During this era the watches were either chrome plated, gold plated or solid gold, however I dont believe this watch is any of those. The watch has zero plating loss and the overall condition would not be in this case if it was using a base metal.
The watch clearly isnt gold, so this leaves the final option of it being stainless steel. The case however is very different from the stainless steel caseback, and just the fact that it is marked stainless steel caseback implies that the case isnt stainless steel.

My question therefore is, if the watch isnt stainless steel, and its not plated, then what exactly is it?
The case shape and lugs are also incredibly rare for this era and i've only ever seen a couple over the last few years.
Could this a unique alloy which was experimented with in order to provide antimagnetic benefits?

Thanks in advance for any information!

View attachment 12871787

View attachment 12871795

View attachment 12871799

View attachment 12871807

View attachment 12871809

View attachment 12871803
 
Discussion starter · #55 ·
That it has no brassing (plating loss) doesn't mean that it isn't plated.

It would help if you would reattach the pictures in your post, as they display as defunct links to an attachment (they redirect to an "invalid attachment specified" error page).
 
My bad, not used to the forum layout and still learning how to attach photos.

Here's an imgur album of the watch. (remove the spaces to get the link to work, WUS doesn't let me post full links since im new.

https:// imgur .com/a/lPlW2

I considered that it could be that chrome was removed but given the case condition and its brushed design I doubt that.
 
Discussion starter · #57 ·
Chrome plated, obviously. I can't see how this case shape and lugs design is rare, let alone incredibly rare. Typical 1940s.

Hands badly relumed, seconds hand is either broken or is a poorly matched replacement part. Given that the shape of it is completely inconsistent with Doxas of the 1940s, I'd go with "incorrect replacement."

The movement is indeed a Doxa 14, i.e. an ETA 810.
 
So someone stripped the entire case of all its chrome?
Thin straight lugs on Doxa's from this era is actually pretty uncommon, there's one on only one on eBay now with a similar shape.

The second's is off, forgot to mention that.
Do you know what base metal Doxa used for this era?
 
Nevermind there are two currently on ebay,

https://www. ebay.com/itm/WW2-MILITARY-MECHANICAL-MENS-SWISS-WATCH-DOXA-1940-1945-Parts-or-Restoration-/152897885190?hash=item23996c9406
and
https://www. ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-VERY-RARE-WW2-MILITARY-OVERSIZE-38MM-MECHANICAL-MENS-SWISS-WATCH-DOXA-/332426891917?hash=item4d662fd28d
(remove space)

Im just surprised the lugs and case details are so sharp if this was indeed an originally chromed watch.
 
Discussion starter · #60 ·
So someone stripped the entire case of all its chrome?
Thin straight lugs on Doxa's from this era is actually pretty uncommon, there's one on only one on eBay now with a similar shape.

The second's is off, forgot to mention that.
Do you know what base metal Doxa used for this era?
As most manufacturers, they used brass. Still, you seem to be dwelling on the thought, that it's either unobtainium, or the plating has been removed. To me, it simply looks like the chrome layer's all there and intact.
 
41 - 60 of 257 Posts