They don’t? They time events with wristwatches? Guess you like, have an opinion, man?
Not too big at all. Anything less than 460mm is a girls watch. Might have to go custom on the nato thoughI got the call today and went and picked up my awesome new Oyster wristwatch. I'm concerned that the case is a little too big for me and it makes my wrist look small. Any tips for a good NATO strap for this?
View attachment 17187087
I understand that nothing is proven; what I'm saying/reiterating is if this is a case of trademark infringement then rolex has a responsibility to protect/retain their trademark. whereas others are just jumping in and simply calling rolex out for harassing some small mom&pop business which suggests to me that those comments are coming not from any awareness of the facts but from a particularly virulent band of rolex-haters who hate rolex because...rolex (not unlike a recent discussion where someone was trashing a brand and a specific watch simply because they kept missing out on the limited edition offerings and became spiteful because of it).Once again, this assumes the "infringement" is real and proven. No formal judgement has been made on this...something to keep in mind...
But the other "side" of this is people simply saying Rolex is right to protect their trademark. This makes an assumption that the claim Rolex is making (that's all it is - a claim) is true. I recall a bunch of lawyers jumping in when the case was filed by employees of a Rolex AD in the US for wrongful dismissal not that long ago, saying that the claims in their filing were just that - claims, and had to be treated with appropriate caution until proven. That sort of thinking appears to have gone out the window when it's Rolex doing the claiming. There is just an assumption that Rolex is in the right by those who are spouting the law.I understand that nothing is proven; what I'm saying/reiterating is if this is a case of trademark infringement then rolex has a responsibility to protect/retain their trademark. whereas others are just jumping in and simply calling rolex out for harassing some small mom&pop business which suggests to me that those comments are coming not from any awareness of the facts but from a particularly virulent band of rolex-haters who hate rolex because...rolex (not unlike a recent discussion where someone was trashing a brand and a specific watch simply because they kept missing out on the limited edition offerings and became spiteful because of it).
what's the saying...and the truth shall set ye free, hopefully before those villagers with torches and pitchforks get any closer
I'm not saying rolex is right, only that, if they are right then they are doing what is right for them and their brand. I have no dog in this fight as I neither own nor have any interest in owning a rolex. but I am seeing people who are immediately assume rolex is at fault and cite how rolex behaves as a business as proof of their culpability in this instance. others seem to feel that even if they aren't technically at fault they are still wrong and should just let it go; not caring how IP works or what a company may have to do to protect their IP.But the other "side" of this is people simply saying Rolex is right to protect their trademark. This makes an assumption that the claim Rolex is making (that's all it is - a claim) is true. I recall a bunch of lawyers jumping in when the case was filed by employees of a Rolex AD in the US for wrongful dismissal not that long ago, saying that the claims in their filing were just that - claims, and had to be treated with appropriate caution until proven. That sort of thinking appears to have gone out the window when it's Rolex doing the claiming. There is just an assumption that Rolex is in the right by those who are spouting the law.
I think regardless of the hate or love for Rolex one might have, the inequities in the "justice" system that a case like this exposes is something we should all be concerned about. Winning shouldn't be about money, and this in case that's all it's about...
Not interested in dog fighting personally, but I do own a Rolex. So I am far from a Rolex hater, which is the tired and well-worn trope that is dragged out here over and over again any time someone dares to disagree with something that the almighty crown does. Good to see you keeping up that tradition...I have no dog in this fight as I neither own nor have any interest in owning a rolex.
From my perspective, plenty of that going on with both sides of this particular discussion...Yes I heard you, not a lot of facts available yet but of the people I'm talking about, they mostly have no need for facts,
Do you really believe that Rolex makes these? Do you think they make this stuff as well?They don’t? They time events with wristwatches? Guess you like, have an opinion, man? View attachment 17187119
No, I’m aware that promotional items are subcontracted. Who makes the official timers for them?Do you really believe that Rolex makes these? Do you think they make this stuff as well?
View attachment 17187438
View attachment 17187437
They built the bespoke failsafe analog speed and timing instruments for the Bloodhound SSC, I doubt they need someone to make their official timers.No, I’m aware that promotional items are subcontracted. Who makes the official timers for them?
Not too crazy about Rolex haters that feel the need to come to Rolex/Tudor subforum to bash the brand any chance they get. Do you see that kind of stalking on Seiko or Omega pages? How does your comment actually contribute to the topic posted?Love the fanboys who are defending Rolex hahaha
I see you went with the sportier dial - I guess yours is a "professional" reference. I went with the dressier dial as I think I'll tend to wear mine more with a suit.Just got the call from the AD (Amazon Driver) and rushed out to
take delivery before they let it go to someone else.
(snip)
![]()
Yes, I was really lucky to be offered a sports model as a first time buy. I find it does peek out a bit from under a cuff, but happily I've got REALLY big wrists!I see you went with the sportier dial - I guess yours is a "professional" reference. I went with the dressier dial as I think I'll tend to wear mine more with a suit.
Something seems off about the font on yours. I would say that perhaps you should get it checked to make sure it's not been re-dialed, but I know you got yours directly from the AD, so it should be fine.
I don't know if you're having the same problem as me, but it's not the thickness that's making it difficult for mine to slip under a shirt cuff, it's the diameter. I know everyone here says it's fine, but this really does wear large compared to my other Rolex watches.
View attachment 17191934
….. a target list??? …5100’s pages long?It's a piece of paper with names on it.
Those who can't do, sue...
I didn't know the public could buy those! I stand corrected!They don’t? They time events with wristwatches? Guess you like, have an opinion, man? View attachment 17187119