WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

1 - 20 of 321 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
251 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
I'd say teeritz is the one to blame for starting all this, you see.

Ever since I read his excellent review of the Omega Railmaster a year ago, I knew I had to have one. I won't go into the reasons why - others have already said it better than I could. Suffice to say I loved the Railmaster's aesthetics, its simplicity, the history behind the name, and the way it hearkened back to the way wristwatches looked fifty years ago. I just knew I had to have one in my collection. If you get it, you already know.

But the fact that the Railmaster had been discontinued for years means that getting one requires more effort than simply fetching the checkbook. Like many things worth having, if you want this watch you have to be patient and wait for the opportunity to present itself. For months I trolled the internet late at night, searching for Railmasters. Finally I found one, a 39 mm model in excellent condition. An agreement was reached. The deal was done. The day came. The watch arrived. It was beautiful. It was everything I'd hoped.



It was also too big. I realized I'd made an expensive mistake.

At 6' 1" I'm not a huge person, and I'm equipped with fairly skinny 6 3/4" wrists. Normally I'm comfortable wearing watches that range from the understated 35 mm size of the 1950's "gentleman's watch", up to a 42 mm diver or chronograph. But the 39 mm Railmaster on my arm looks like a dinner plate. Oh, the case is a comfortable size, but the fact that the dial goes aaaalllllll the way to the edge makes it appear positively enormous in proportion to its surroundings. For instance, take a look at how big the dial is compared to a 42 mm Planet Ocean:



Someone bigger than I am could probably easily pull it off, but on me it's just too big. It's funny how just a few millimeters here or there makes a world of difference in how you perceive the size of a particular watch. Here's the 39 mm Railmaster next to my 38.5 mm Aqua Terra 8500, the latter of which I find quite comfortable to wear. On paper these two pieces are virtually the same size; in practice I found them to "wear" very differently indeed. Look past the case size and compare the distance between the outer edges of the hour markers on the two dials, and you'll see it:



And of course it all comes down to personal preferences as well. As someone who generally goes through life feeling like I was born a few decades too late, I've never got on board with the recent huge watch trend. I simply prefer my watches to adhere to the more classic sizing of years gone by. The Omegas in my collection are intended to be "keepers", and I plan to hang onto them through the next fad, and the one after that. For the most part I tend to only collect watches that I think have a certain extra "something" that gives them an element of timeless appeal... to me, anyhow. It's such a personal hobby, this, and each individual has to decide which ones are worth hanging on to and which ones to let go of. In my experience, if the watch is right for you, you'll just know it when you put it on.

So I knew right away that I should have passed on the 39 mm Railmaster and sought out a smaller 36 mm sized one instead. Unfortunately for me, if Railmasters are uncommon, the 36 mm size in particular is positively as scarce as hen's teeth! I figured I was in for another year of searching.

But by some quirk of luck, I ran across an example of what I wanted barely a month later. Another deal was done. Another watch arrived.

This time it was perfect.

Ladies and gentlemen, I'm pleased to present something that's not seen every day - a 39 mm Railmaster and a 36 mm Railmaster side by side:



The proportions of the two are ever so slightly different - the lugs on the larger watch appear somewhat more slender, and the crown on the smaller watch looks more substantial with respect to the case. Size-wise, the 36 mm version puts me very much in mind of the original Explorer, which is exactly what I'd hoped.



The apparent size of the dial on the 36 mm Railmaster is approximately the same as that of the 38.5 mm Aqua Terra, even though the case is slightly smaller. I always wear the AT 8500 on its bracelet, so I will likely put the RM on a brown leather strap to allow each to have its own separate identity. I find the 8500 bracelet much superior to the 2500 anyway, especially the clasp, so I don't think I'll miss it terribly. The Railmaster looks great on a strap too.



No more mistaking which one is the dive watch and which one isn't!



Who's up for a double helping of Railmaster lume?



Anyway, thanks for looking, hope you enjoyed the photos. The larger Railmaster will find a new home in due course, I'm sure. Meanwhile, I'm very happy to have found my Railmaster at last.

Oh, and confidential to teeritz - thanks for the introduction to the Railmaster world. I owe you a drink sometime. I imagine we could find something in common...

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
99 Posts
Well written and well said! Teeritz's earlier posts have made me want the same 36mm Railmaster, and if I find one, I'll be jumping on it!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
251 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Could you possibly measure the dial sizes of each RM and share that info too?
Sure, no problem. Measured with a digital caliper between the outer edges of the 12 and 6 o'clock markers, I get the following:

38.5 mm AT 8500: 26.5 mm dial
36 mm Railmaster: 27.0 mm dial
42 mm Speedmaster Pro: 28.0 mm dial
42 mm Planet Ocean: 28.5 mm dial
39 mm Railmaster: 30.0 mm dial

All dimensions +/- a half millimeter or so. You can see that the dial on the 39 mm RM is quite substantial indeed!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,217 Posts
So how long until you sell the PO? Haha ...

I have small wrists too, being 6.25", but I found the 39mm to be comfortable. I also couldn't agree with you more that 38.5 AT8500 is incredibly comfortable to wear - it might be one of the most comfortable Omegas I've owned.

I love the 36-39mm size on watches. If I ever see a 36mm Railmaster pop up, I would likely buy it immediately then decide whether I like it or not.

Beautiful photos and beautiful watches - that's a perfect collection as far as I'm concerned!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
251 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
So how long until you sell the PO? Haha ...

I have small wrists too, being 6.25", but I found the 39mm to be comfortable.
Hah - never, i hope! The PO is for those days when I want my watch to say, "Out of the way, big chunk of metal coming through over here."

I certainly could get by with the 39 mm RM if that was the only size available. But on me the 36 mm Railmaster is just perfect. As for what it says, it's probably something like "Three measures of Gordon's, one of vodka. Shake it very well until it's ice-cold, then add a large thin slice of lemon-peel. Got it?" ;)

- Matt
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,267 Posts
Whoa, parallel universe of sorts. A while back I purchased this without benefit of handling it first. Specs would make it wearable for me, even with just a 6.5 inch wrist since other larger watches are just fine. Nada. When it came in my heart sank cause it was way too large for my wrist to my eyes. Ended up moving it out. That 36 mm model you have is killer, btw, congrats . . .
 

Attachments

  • Like
Reactions: TedG954 and dosei

·
Registered
Joined
·
251 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
Whoa, parallel universe of sorts. A while back I purchased this without benefit of handling it first. Specs would make it wearable for me, even with just a 6.5 inch wrist since other larger watches are just fine. Nada. When it came in my heart sank cause it was way too large for my wrist to my eyes. Ended up moving it out.
Parallel universe indeed! Well, it's resolved then... the Railmaster is like one of those stores where all the clothes are too big and everybody ends up ordering the next smaller size. ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
291 Posts
Congratulations my friend! The 36mm Railmaster is a gorgeous piece and that is a great story of how it was obtained! Wear in good health and enjoy.

If you ever want to sell it... ;-)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,169 Posts
Awesome reference thread, with a clear display of size differences. You should receive many thanks for the effort from those hunting for a Railmaster.

I know what you mean about the size. When I received mine a month or so ago, I was gob smacked, it looked so massive. I'm used to smaller watches also and prefer them. However, after getting over the initial shock, I immediately fell in love with my Raily. It compliments my 36mm AT2500 very nicely also. I love the large size of the dial in fact, and I'm thinking I would not necessarily like the 36mm more, even though it's my prefered size. If a chance arose though, I would also get one and decide which I prefer. As it stands though, my current feeling is that my 39mm Railmaster could even be that mythical "one watch" for me. The only reason I'm not wearing it as I type is that I'm waiting for an additional half link to arrive from the United Kingdom, so I can get a perfect fit! On that day, I will fear for my other watches!

Anyway, glad you got there in the end, and here's the obligatory mine says hi (6.9" wrist on a 5'10" 80kg frame BTW) |>

 
  • Like
Reactions: dosei

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,028 Posts
I'd say teeritz is the one to blame for starting all this, you see...
They always blame me for their lack of restraint.

At 6' 1" I'm not a huge person, and I'm equipped with fairly skinny 6 3/4" wrists. Normally I'm comfortable wearing watches that range from the understated 35 mm size of the 1950's "gentleman's watch", up to a 42 mm diver or chronograph. But the 39 mm Railmaster on my arm looks like a dinner plate. Oh, the case is a comfortable size, but the fact that the dial goes aaaalllllll the way to the edge makes it appear positively enormous in proportion to its surroundings.
When I first began to consider the Railmaster (I actually wound up getting the 36mm black-dialled AT instead. Needed a date), my boss was pushing for me to go for the 39mm model. But on my 6.5 inch wrist, the thirty-nine mil looked absolutely huge, and I always told customers that the entire AquaTerra range wore larger than their diameters would have you believe because of the fact that their dials go all the way to the edge.


And of course it all comes down to personal preferences as well. As someone who generally goes through life feeling like I was born a few decades too late, I've never got on board with the recent huge watch trend.
That line pretty much mirrors what I have written on my blog. It's practically gonna be my epitath;




I simply prefer my watches to adhere to the more classic sizing of years gone by. The Omegas in my collection are intended to be "keepers", and I plan to hang onto them through the next fad, and the one after that.
For the most part I tend to only collect watches that I think have a certain extra "something" that gives them an element of timeless appeal... to me, anyhow. It's such a personal hobby, this, and each individual has to decide which ones are worth hanging on to and which ones to let go of. In my experience, if the watch is right for you, you'll just know it when you put it on.
I like you, pal. That was well said, and I agree 100%. I've made a few mistakes throughout my years of collecting, but there are numerous models in my stable that are going nowhere. Some of them are not the popular choices of modern watch collectors, but this hobby is, as you say, a personal thing.


The proportions of the two are ever so slightly different - the lugs on the larger watch appear somewhat more slender, and the crown on the smaller watch looks more substantial with respect to the case. Size-wise, the 36 mm version puts me very much in mind of the original Explorer, which is exactly what I'd hoped.
I had, for some time, considered going for a 1016 Explorer;



Classic, classic wristwatch. However, going for a modern Railmaster instead would assure me a level of water-resistance that a vintage Explorer could not guarantee.
And I can rip off a vintage Rolex magazine ad as well as anybody;




Oh, and confidential to teeritz - thanks for the introduction to the Railmaster world. I owe you a drink sometime. I imagine we could find something in common...

One drink may not be enough, sir. We may need to go out on a bender, 1950s-style. You know, a three-Martini lunch before we drive to some other bar with no seatbelts on. If we're gonna do it, we might as well do it right.



EDIT: Where are my manners?! Thanks for the kind words, workahol!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
251 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
Thanks teeritz, mosfetaus, and John for contributing more tasty Railmaster images! The internet can never have too many of those. (also, what in the world is that blue background and where can I get one?)

Went to resize the bracelet on my new acquisition and managed to get one of the pins well and truly stuck halfway. That's never happened to me before, or at least I've never gotten one so stuck that I couldn't unstick it. No idea what its problem is, but it's more than a match for the tools I have available. So it's off to the jeweler tomorrow to get it fixed, therefore no wrist shot just yet.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,080 Posts
Great looking watches and great photos, always liked the railmaster :-!

I suffer from the opposite problem since my wrist is a wide 7 3/4", anything less than 39mm looks too small on my wrist. I have the 42mm Aqua Terra which I think uses the same cases as the railmaster series b-)
 
1 - 20 of 321 Posts
Top