Wondering if they're on the ground in the U.S. yet. Thanks!
From the Seiko boutiques either Melbourne or SydneyWhere in Australia are people picking these up from?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How much are they?From the Seiko boutiques either Melbourne or Sydney
$1995 AUDHow much are they?
How much are they?
Yeah I got scammed by a watch flipper from Queensland called Christophe Britton. He owed me $2500 and gave me this watch plus $300. I found out afterwards he only paid $1995 for the watch. Keep an eye out for this guy lads.$1995 AUD
Gorgeous watch!Sorry guys I was stuck at work and the sun had set by the time I had a chance to take some photos. I will take some outdoor pictures tomorrow.
View attachment 15328937 View attachment 15328938 View attachment 15328939 View attachment 15328940 View attachment 15328941 View attachment 15328942 View attachment 15328943 View attachment 15328944
Not sure if I'm using the proper terminology but the 12 o'clock index was slightly misaligned with the chapter marker. It was barely noticeable but once I saw it I couldn't unsee it. I knew it would bug me so I decided to wait until I found an example that was aligned.Why?
I needed no convincing...I've been chomping at the bit to pick up this Uemura/Willard re-issue. I passed because of a very minor quality issue.Did you pass originally due to a quality issue or just weren't quite convinced yet?
PMedWhere in Australia are people picking these up from?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Whatsthe lug size ? Thanks.View attachment 15346009
View attachment 15346014
Another pic on the US [emoji515] Might try it on the waffle as well at some point.
My wrist is 7" for those that asked.
It's 20mm between the lugs and 47mm L to L.Whatsthe lug size ? Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you for your quick reply RCorreale!It's 20mm between the lugs and 47mm L to L.
He, like me I believe, didn't come access angry in the least; he stated factual differences (longer vertically/less round like the 6105 and not quite 43mm, higher crown position. I will say - if I couldn't have afforded my SLA033 - I'd be angry about the scimpy cases, thick hour hand, cheap looking indices. It's a shame it looks more like a 6309 than the 6105. I'm just being honest.More like people angry they couldn't afford the SLA033 with its retail price and limited availability.
I don't even understand why SLA033 owners would be angry at a cheaper model that's even farther away from the original, if anything they should be cheering that the cheap model is so much worse lmao!
It's doesn't look anything like a 6105. It's shaped like a SRP, considerably smaller and it's crown looks nothing like a 6105's; it's just a basic crown SEIKO yanked off all the dead SKXs laying around. Oh, and said crown sits at 3:49 - maybe :50 at most?! Granted, I've never held one of these watches. I do own, love and never take off my SLA033. I've had her since late '19 and it does look like 6105. Honestly, had I not been able to afford her at the time (I would've found a way), I would've been very disappointed with these "modern interpretations" of a vintage design. Modern-day SEIKO has released, as we say here in the south, a half-assed interpretation that men will have to accept. That's just my opinion.Looks freaking awesome. About damn time Seiko!! I always wanted a 6105!!