Well, doesn't this settle the "G-Shocks with business attire" debate?Or could it be a DW-290?
![]()
Our tax consulent came by yesterday afternoon, to arrange our tax forms for this year. He was very business like dressed, but under his shirt he wore a very old (according to himself) DW-6600. Nothing wrong with G-Shock and business attire I think.dudegalea said:Well, doesn't this settle the "G-Shocks with business attire" debate?
Even FBI Directors can have bad taste. ;-)Now that is just a cool photo. And it does seem to put to bed the "G-Shocks and business attire" debate ;-).
I love my Gs too, but I wouldn't wear them with a suit, unless I had no other choice. I also wouldn't wear cheap shoes with a suit, or a cheap shirt and tie. To each their own.Funny thing is I have a Panerai, Baume & Mercier, Oris, and I still love my G's
After all this years and with all that free (well, ok, not quite free... he does have to babysit that 3 year old) time on his hand our beloved friend bruce is still trying to be a "true ladies man"... :-d:-d:-dI love my Gs too, but I wouldn't wear them with a suit, unless I had no other choice. I also wouldn't wear cheap shoes with a suit, or a cheap shirt and tie. To each their own.
I see it the same way. I can understand any of these political figures caught wearing a Casio on their day off, or when they're "off-suit". But when dressed up, wearing a fine watch is as essential as fine shoes. I think that today the acceptable "dress watch" is in a broader range, but certainly nothing made of plastic and definitely analog hands.I love my Gs too, but I wouldn't wear them with a suit, unless I had no other choice. I also wouldn't wear cheap shoes with a suit, or a cheap shirt and tie. To each their own.
I'm working on becoming 0013 or something :-d:-dAfter all this years and with all that free (well, ok, not quite free... he does have to babysit that 3 year old) time on his hand our beloved friend bruce is still trying to be a "true ladies man"... :-d:-d:-d