WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Garmin fenix - An Ongoing Review in Several Parts

748139 Views 1343 Replies 231 Participants Last post by  KiwiWomble
Suunto introduced the AMBIT GPS/ABC watch and now Garmin has introduced their version - the fenix.

What I would like to do is invite you to join me in exploring the various aspects of the Garmin fenix as I find out about its capabilities, features, drawbacks, surprises, etc.

Since I would like to wear the fenix as an everyday watch, the first question that comes up is just how well does it do as a simple digital watch - ignoring for the moment all the other features.

Here is how it arrived today:



The contents are the watch, an AC charger/USB adapter, USB to watch cable, product safety information booklet in 12 languages, and two quick start guides - one in English and one in Spanish:



Deciding to read the booklets later, I turned the watch on, selected English as my language and opted to automatically sync time and date info with the GPS signal:



I was in my office and expected to have to go closer to a window, or even outdoors, to successfully obtain my first cold sync, but before I could even stand up, the watch had sync'd and was displaying correct time and date info:



Honestly, I was amazed. Note in the picture above that the computer display actually reads 18:30 (I was a bit too quick on the trigger taking the picture) which is the same as 6:30 PM shown on the watch. My past experience with GPS units of all types has been that if a unit is a long way from its last sync location, it requires some time to gather satellite info thus making for a longer "Cold" start. Subsequent "Warm" and "Hot" starts take less time because the unit knows generally where it is.

My first Cold start was less than a minute and subsequent Hot starts were virtually instantaneous. All indoors. I am thoroughly impressed.

Before doing anything else, I thought it would be a good idea to fully charge the watch using the supplied AC adapter. So at 6:38 PM with the watch at 52% charge, I started charging:



One hour and 32 minutes later, the watch was fully charged:



Since I like 24-hour time, I then switched the watch over to a 24-hour display:



Then I plugged the fenix into a USB port on my computer and went to the Garmin site to register it and check for any software updates.

The watch looked like this when connected:



And the Garmin site advised me that updates were indeed available:



The updates were for System software and several language options in addition to the language options already in the watch:



Details of the system updates:



The watch updating:



After a couple of minutes:



And the watch was on my wrist:



The display is very easy to read and may get even better once I have a chance to adjust the display contrast.

The stock (Polyurethane?) band is soft, comfortable and is not a dust magnet. The keeper has a lug on its underside which engages the slots in the tail end of the strap so that the keeper stays in place. Lug width is 26mm. The strap is affixed to the watch with two T10 Torx screws which screw into a metal bar in place in the end of the strap. It is a very secure setup. It appears that the metal bar in the end of the strap can easily be removed thus allowing for the easy adaptation to a NATO/Zulu type of strap. Watch for that soon.

There are many main time display options, but note in the picture above that I have chosen continuous display of Hour, Minute, Seconds, Month, Day and Date. All automatically sync'd to the GPS signal.

Other display options include variations on this theme:



And constant display of battery charge and Sunrise data:



There are many more options available - too many to show here.

It's always problematic accurately representing a backlight in a photo, but here is my attempt with the watch in semi-darkness with the backlight off and on:



The watch caseback is pretty straightforward:



It is comfortable on the wrist with no protrusions or irregular surfaces which could cause discomfort.

There are multiple alarms which can be set for one time only or to repeat daily, to alert with a tone, vibration or both. Alerts which tie into the GPS. A programmable alarm based on time until sunset. Interval timers. A countdown timer settable to the second. A stopwatch.

I've only just scratched the surface of the WATCH capabilities of the fenix, and it has every conceivable timing/time feature I can think of.

One last note for those who live in an "odd" time zone - the watch can be set to sync time/date info with the GPS signal, but you can choose to set your time zone manually.

That's all for the first installment. Next I'll start exploring some of the ABC and Fitness/training features of the fenix.

Please feel free to ask any questions or request any pictures that I have not included.

Hope you all enjoy reading about the fenix as much as I enjoy learning and writing about it.

HTH
See less See more
18
  • Like
Reactions: 5
261 - 280 of 1344 Posts
If you are in North America, WAAS will increase the accuracy of the GPS fix, so I don't see any down side to enabling it. I enabled it on my fenix.

See here for more info: Garmin | What is WAAS?

HTH
Thanks, I had actually already read the WAAS site but could not understand why that would be set to Off for units shipped to the U.S. Oh well, thanks for your help.
If you are in North America, WAAS will increase the accuracy of the GPS fix, so I don't see any down side to enabling it. I enabled it on my fenix.

See here for more info: Garmin | What is WAAS?

HTH
Yes, but... There's always a but, and maybe why Garmin leaves it disabled. There is generally less battery life in units with WAAS enabled*. It would be interesting to see if this is true of the fenix. I haven't seen any recent data on WAAS and battery consumption.

Additionally, WAAS data is only available from two gps satellites, which are in orbit over the equator. They tend to be low in the sky in the USA, especially for northern parts. Unless you have a clear view of the southern horizon, you will often not receive the WAAS signal long enough to acquire correction data.

Maybe Garmin feels that a lot of users will not see a benefit, and they felt there was some power impact, so disabled it for USA units. That's my guess.

(It doesn't look like any of these details are really given in the linked webpage. Silly Garmin.)

*edit: I did a little more searching for details on this. It sounds like with some Garmin units, Garmin says that WAAS 'significantly reduces battery life.' I don't think that's true of all their units though. I've used a Garmin Rino with WAAS in the past. I wouldn't say it cut battery life in half, for example, but don't have any hard numbers.

More discussion about WAAS than you may care to read: http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=207030
See less See more
Thanks DerSchmitty and Martowl. It's great to hear what others who use the devices like I do think!

I've been weighing the pros and cons of these two devices for a while now. (only speculatively on the fenix of course)
Here is what it is boiling down to for me....

Almost all of my concerns, (Auto Lap issue, Problems with uploading, Sunrise/Sunset data, etc..) is fixable with a software upgrade.
Of course that doesn't mean these things will ever actually BE upgraded, but they could be. I'm choosing to base my decision on what CAN'T be upgraded.

Heart Rate Strap -vs- Vibrating Alerts.

These are the two attributes that are important to me that don't have software upgrade potential.
The Ambit, in my opinion far outperforms the Fenix when it comes to HR monitoring. (and again, I have used the Garmin Premium HR Strap)
In both physical performance (comfort and accuracy), and software features (Recovery Time, Peak Training Effect) the Ambit is the clear winner.
I suppose the release of a better strap by Garmin would change the game here, but I have no reason to think that will happen.
The Fenix has vibrating alerts, (which I have had in the past with the Garmin 310xt), and love.

So the Ambit wins for me. A more sophisticated training tool (HR) is more crucial than the vibrating alerts.

wish I didn't have to choose...
See less See more
A second question is regarding the altimeter. A friend of mine and I ran a race this last weekend and he recently purchased a fenix. The altimeter on his was off by a lot on ascent/descent compared to my Ambit and I suspect Garmin does not have this quite worked out yet. How do you calibrate the altimeter/barometer? I had the 910XT prior to the Ambit for a short while and never had any reliable altimeter readings as it is calibrated by a known location, which never seemed to work. The ascent/descent and altitude are important to me when in the mountains as they help me gauge time I will spend out as well as identifying true or false summits. Since you had/have an Ambit, do you have a feeling or any tests regarding the fenix altimeter/barometer?
Heh, that friend would be me. :) Indeed, as noted, the total ascent/descent was *way* off, as seen in the track I took with my new Fenix during the race:
Run Rabbit Run 100+ miler by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details

After hobbling around for a few days, I got out for my usual morning jog the past few mornings: Green by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details Green, FIT by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details

Both mornings, I ran the exact same loop. As you can see, the ascent/descent for those two are pretty consistent, and quite reasonable (not way off, like the track from the race was). Both of those tracks were uploaded as FIT files, while the race was uploaded as a GPX. That got me thinking that perhaps the GPX files only give GPS elevation, not barometric. So to check, I uploaded this morning's route as a GPX also: Green, GPX by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details Nope, apparently that wasn't the problem.

In summary, I have no idea why the track from the race was so far off. It was done in Ultratrac; perhaps that's the culprit? Dunno...

Meanwhile, I'll point out that the ASCENT data item is totally hosed. It reads silly numbers, even when I haven't started moving yet. Seems to be a Garmin bug. The LAP ASCENT appears fine.

I owned an Ambit for a little while before switching to the Fenix. In my thus-far limited experience, the Ambit's altimeter is substantially better. The Fenix just seems to dither more, obfuscating things like VERT SPEED when going up/downhill on foot (it'll bounce around a lot, whereas the Ambit offered a smoothly-varying reading).

Regardless, I'm very satisfied with the Fenix. For me, it's a great choice.

Cheers,

- Fred
See less See more
Heh, that friend would be me. :) Indeed, as noted, the total ascent/descent was *way* off, as seen in the track I took with my new Fenix during the race:
Run Rabbit Run 100+ miler by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details

After hobbling around for a few days, I got out for my usual morning jog the past few mornings: Green by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details Green, FIT by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details

- Fred
hello Fred:). Thanks for being kind enough not to mention you got a lot more data than I did:(. Guess you found me here. I will have to talk to you more about the fenix. One think I like is using Basecamp to make prospective routes. It is a lot easier than what I did for RRR 100! I may have to try a fenix and then make a decision---I can just hear Jennifer's voice in my head.....another watch!?

Brad
Yes, but... There's always a but, and maybe why Garmin leaves it disabled. There is generally less battery life in units with WAAS enabled*. It would be interesting to see if this is true of the fenix. I haven't seen any recent data on WAAS and battery consumption.
When I ran my battery consumption tests above, WAAS was enabled on my fenix. With WAAS enabled, it exceeded the spec of 16 Hours when GPS was in Normal mode. If there is any decrease in battery life when WAAS is enabled, then it is not enough to shorten the battery life to less than the specification.

Additionally, WAAS data is only available from two gps satellites, which are in orbit over the equator. They tend to be low in the sky in the USA, especially for northern parts. Unless you have a clear view of the southern horizon, you will often not receive the WAAS signal long enough to acquire correction data.
Here is the WAAS coverage map:



Seems that if you are in North America, you're going to benefit from WAAS.

Here is how it manifests itself on the fenix and how you can tell if you are receiving WAAS correction data:

HOME>Setup>System>WAAS>On

This enables WAAS on your fenix.

Then go to:

HOME>GPS Tools>Satellites(wait for a fix)then scroll up or down until you see this display:



At first, all of the signal strength "boxes" will be plain boxes like satellites number 18 and 22 in the pic. After a while, however, if you are receiving WAAS correction Data, a small letter "D" will be displayed in the upper left corner of the box which denotes correction data for that satellite has been applied.

How do I know the little "D" has anything to do with WAAS? Turn WAAS Off and all the little "D" markers no longer display.

Further, the GPS fix I have shown here was accomplished indoors, in my office, about 30 feet from the nearest window. So I don't think the WAAS data is unusually difficult to receive. Those satellites are probably not as low on the southern horizon as you suspect.

Maybe Garmin feels that a lot of users will not see a benefit, and they felt there was some power impact, so disabled it for USA units. That's my guess.
My guess is that since Garmin ships these all over the world, and since WAAS is only for North America, they felt it was easier to explain to North American users why they should turn ON a feature, than to explain to the rest of the world why they should turn OFF a feature.

(It doesn't look like any of these details are really given in the linked webpage. Silly Garmin.)

*edit: I did a little more searching for details on this. It sounds like with some Garmin units, Garmin says that WAAS 'significantly reduces battery life.' I don't think that's true of all their units though. I've used a Garmin Rino with WAAS in the past. I wouldn't say it cut battery life in half, for example, but don't have any hard numbers.

More discussion about WAAS than you may care to read: Should I have WAAS/EGNOS enabled on my GPS ? - Groundspeak Forums
I thought the Garmin explanation was pretty good: Garmin | What is WAAS?

As I see no evidence of reduced battery life in the fenix when WAAS is enabled, I wonder how germane discussion of battery life in other models is.

My conclusion based on observation and use so far is that if you are in North America, there is no downside to enabling WAAS on your fenix.

HTH

Edit to add:

Upon further investigation, WAAS will only work when GPS is in Normal Mode, it will not work when GPS is in UltraTrac mode.

This is evidently the case because in UltraTrac mode, the GPS is not on long enough to acquire the necessary data. It may also be the case that Garmin software will not allow the fenix to attempt to gather WAAS data, even if WAAS is set to Enable, when in UltraTrac mode.

Note: Satellites #48 and #51 are the two satellites transmitting the WAAS data and their corresponding strength bars will never display the "D" symbol.
See less See more
2
Heh, that friend would be me. :) Indeed, as noted, the total ascent/descent was *way* off, as seen in the track I took with my new Fenix during the race:
Run Rabbit Run 100+ miler by fredecks at Garmin Connect - Details

...

In summary, I have no idea why the track from the race was so far off. It was done in Ultratrac; perhaps that's the culprit? Dunno...

Meanwhile, I'll point out that the ASCENT data item is totally hosed. It reads silly numbers, even when I haven't started moving yet. Seems to be a Garmin bug. The LAP ASCENT appears fine.
You can see on that long run that GPS lost signal in one place.
Another is you used Ultratrack and if it was 1min interval thats the source of elevation problem and I guess also problem with distance.
Using Ultratrack with 1min when running is not good idea, you can see there is a lot of shortcuts on the track you linked.

HUGE distance! Maybe Ultratrack 30s would be good on that but not for sure. That was 30hours run! What about Ambit's battery and GPS interval, can we see that track?
Basecamp app is in the apple app store. Not compatable with iPhone 4 though, only 4s!
Basecamp app is in the apple app store. Not compatable with iPhone 4 though, only 4s!
Thank you for posting that info.

And I can confirm that it is not compatible with my iPhone 4 - that's a significant disappointment. :-(
Re: Garmin fenix - A Review in Several Parts

Thank's for posting the strap replacement - I've got a black Zulu awaiting and I was worried about the fit after seeing the weird tapped bar thing in the strap earlier, really glad it's a simple job.
You're welcome - glad you found the information helpful. ;-)

Post a picture of yours on the black strap when you receive it.
Basecamp app is in the apple app store. Not compatable with iPhone 4 though, only 4s!
Cool. Just loaded it up. Glad to have this first step on the way to SmartPhone and tablet integration.
First impressions:
- Pretty basic functionality.
- Useful for reviewing tracks, routes, waypoints. Existing tracks, WP, etc from the fenix are accurately placed and show nicely.
- Graphs of HR, Elev, Temp, pace. One parameter per graph.
- No route creation (AFAIK).
- Waypoint creation has an error. I created a couple, and they get created offset from the cross hairs, e.g. by 30-400ft on the ones I made. Confirmed in GE, that it's the recorded Lat/Long vs the Apps crosshairs that's broken.
- Data is automatically synched both ways... no dragging, choosing, sending, receiving required. (data only stored in the fenix, nothing stored in the phone after disconnecting)
Thank you for posting that info.

And I can confirm that it is not compatible with my iPhone 4 - that's a significant disappointment. :-(
Any idea to install Basecamp mobile on an Iphone 4 (even jailbreak Iphone) ?

Thanks.
My quick thoughts on the fenix (as a road cyclist, triathlete, MTBer and sometimes runner).

I've been waiting for a waterproof GPS watch for a long time. One with form factor that can be worn as an everyday watch. Fenix fits the bill. I just feel Garmin is really missing a large demographic by ignoring some simple options available on the 910xt. i.e. footpod and power meter capability. Is it just my opinion that the cyclist, triathlete and running community is a larger one than the hiking/outdoor crowd (that the fenix is geared toward)?

I know I'm not the only one that would love to see some of the 910xt features incorporated into a watch with form factor similar to the fenix (or forerunner 110,210 and 610). Most people who enjoy the sports I mention above are also hikers and outdoor enthusiasts and the fenix is very close to satisfying a wider range of people.

The lack of footpod support and power meter capability combined with using Basecamp and not Garmin Connect to upload courses made me make the decision to return the watch to REI. I would consider the Ambit (as I've had Suunto's in the past and liked them) but I rely on Strava.com for training and posting workouts and the work around with the Ambit to get files to Strava is too much. (Plus the price....). So now I'm back to my trusty forerunner 110 for running and Edge 800 for cycling....and hoping there may be some furure updates to make me a believer in the fenix.
See less See more
Cool. Just loaded it up. Glad to have this first step on the way to SmartPhone and tablet integration.
First impressions:
- Data is automatically synched both ways... no dragging, choosing, sending, receiving required. (data only stored in the fenix, nothing stored in the phone after disconnecting)
Seriously, you cannot download the data to the phone? This would have been one of my reasons for considering the fenix, to have multiday trips recorded that I could simply download to the phone when the fenix memory is full. I cannot believe it is simply a large screen for the fenix. Does it show the alternate basemap that you added?
Cool. Just loaded it up. Glad to have this first step on the way to SmartPhone and tablet integration.
(about Iphone Basecamp)

So, is it wireless, using bluetooth? That's pretty neat, if so.
When I ran my battery consumption tests above, WAAS was enabled on my fenix. With WAAS enabled, it exceeded the spec of 16 Hours when GPS was in Normal mode. If there is any decrease in battery life when WAAS is enabled, then it is not enough to shorten the battery life to less than the specification.
Hmm, did your test occur in the same office you mention later? See below.

Here is the WAAS coverage map:
Seems that if you are in North America, you're going to benefit from WAAS.
I'm interested in why you think the FAA's flight coverage for WAAS above 200-300ft above ground level for aircraft is applicable to people on the ground? It is true, that in many places with clear view of the horizon, handheld users will get good signal. This does not mean that just as many will have no signal at ground level.
Here is how it manifests itself on the fenix and how you can tell if you are receiving WAAS correction data:HOME>Setup>System>WAAS>OnThis enables WAAS on your fenix.Then go to:HOME>GPS Tools>Satellites(wait for a fix)then scroll up or down until you see this display:
At first, all of the signal strength "boxes" will be plain boxes like satellites number 18 and 22 in the pic. After a while, however, if you are receiving WAAS correction Data, a small letter "D" will be displayed in the upper left corner of the box which denotes correction data for that satellite has been applied.How do I know the little "D" has anything to do with WAAS? Turn WAAS Off and all the little "D" markers no longer display.Further, the GPS fix I have shown here was accomplished indoors, in my office, about 30 feet from the nearest window. So I don't think the WAAS data is unusually difficult to receive. Those satellites are probably not as low on the southern horizon as you suspect.
I'm surprised, so I tried the same. In my office, I receive no gps signals at all. I did receive WAAS in the office parking lot, fairly strongly. I then left the watch on for the ~10 mile drive home. The WAAS satellite signal was gone shortly after leaving the parking lot. All 'D'ifferential data disappeared within about 5-10 minutes. I did not receive any indication of WAAS over the entire drive home.I'd suggest you try it outside your office in some more real world usage. ;-)
My guess is that since Garmin ships these all over the world, and since WAAS is only for North America, they felt it was easier to explain to North American users why they should turn ON a feature, than to explain to the rest of the world why they should turn OFF a feature.
While you are technically correct that WAAS is North America only, there are systems in other countries using the same correction technique. I would expect Garmin to support them as well.
See less See more
(about Iphone Basecamp)

So, is it wireless, using bluetooth? That's pretty neat, if so.
Yes Bluetooth.
Seriously, you cannot download the data to the phone? This would have been one of my reasons for considering the fenix, to have multiday trips recorded that I could simply download to the phone when the fenix memory is full. I cannot believe it is simply a large screen for the fenix. Does it show the alternate basemap that you added?
Hi.
Second impressions:
If you've got an iPhone4 or an Android, you aren't missing much really.
After playing with it for a bit , it's really not something that I'll end up using much. As is.

Indeed thinking about a "usage model"
- Data/Track review: Works ok for the very basics. But since there's no cached maps, I can't think of a time/place when I'd need it.
- Extended outing download (sans PC): Nope. Not as is. Seriously... where's the upload to Garmin Connect, or the "Store Until Later" option.
- Waypoint planning: OK (if the offset problem is fixed). Only when there's a signal.
- Route planning: Not at all.
- In fact, without the fenix connected, there is zero you can do with app. Can't even see a map or Google imagery or create a waypoint. OK, you can read the EULA which is good for laugh and to feel glad that you aren't lawyer who has to write phenomenally contorted sentences for a living. (I'm not slagging off all Lawyers, just those lawyers)

Now if Trimble Navigator starts to support the fenix... then we're talking.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
It seems that waas is compatible with egnos (same System like waas but in Europe). Since both are compatible, do you know if Fenix can use waas data in Europe ?
Hi.

Now if Trimble Navigator starts to support the fenix... then we're talking.
now your talking, that is the app that replaced my Garmin handheld, the screen on my iPhone is so much better.
261 - 280 of 1344 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top