This is a tough call... it all depends on what "type" are you... if you're more "traditional G" type you'll love the traditional bulky look and feel of new Gulfman... however if you preffer something that wears a bit smaller than traditional G than new mudman is defenetly way to go.
Both watches are truly great and you won't go wrong with either.
Do note however that Gulfman shown in pic is solar and mutiband 5... mudman however is neither solar nor atomic...
In my mind at least solar and atomic are defenetly worth while paying extra for.
Hope this helps.
Let us know what you decided and defenetly post some pictures when arrives.
Seeing that you can afford the Frogman, I'd go for the Mudman and Gulfman, and still come out $10.00 ahead. :-d
In all honesty, if I had neither a Mudman, Gulfman, nor Frogman, I'd go for the Frogman. You get good features, one of the few truly dependable solar modules, monstrous wrist presence, computability with strap adapters, screwback construction, and a model that is guaranteed to only go up in value. But I wouldn't choose it over both a Gulfman and a Mudman.
A forum community dedicated to watch owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about watch collections, displays, watch winders, accessories, classifieds, and more! We welcome all manufacturers including Casio G-Shock, OMEGA, Rolex, Breitling, Rolex and Tudor, Seiko, Grand Seiko and others.