Joined
·
2,296 Posts
The problem with these kinds of rankings is the category description. This is similar to the issue that vexed Wittgenstein to no end in his famous musings on "games."
With this in mind, it blows my mind that Seiko, Citizen, Casio and Orient are relegated to the lowest tier of "Consumer."
These brands (excepting Casio and Orient) have offerings that blow straight up through "Enthusiast" into "Quasi-Luxury" and beyond.
In the end, all these categorizations, rankings, and pigeon-holing efforts get us nowhere.
For the WUS community at least, I'd like to think that each watch is taken on its merits, brand be damned.
For major brands that transgress tiers, each watch should be taken on its own and not pigeon-holed.
Each watch needs to be considered on its own.
With this in mind, it blows my mind that Seiko, Citizen, Casio and Orient are relegated to the lowest tier of "Consumer."
These brands (excepting Casio and Orient) have offerings that blow straight up through "Enthusiast" into "Quasi-Luxury" and beyond.
In the end, all these categorizations, rankings, and pigeon-holing efforts get us nowhere.
For the WUS community at least, I'd like to think that each watch is taken on its merits, brand be damned.
For major brands that transgress tiers, each watch should be taken on its own and not pigeon-holed.
Each watch needs to be considered on its own.