Tourbillons. They seem to cost a lot. They are also really cool to look at for a nerdy guy like me. But what about their durability? There's got to be a durability loss compared to an equally made traditional automatic, but how much?
Aragon just released an automatic tourbillon yesterday. $650.They do cost a lot because they are a way for watch manufacturers to 'show their skills'. Tourbillons are not difficult to make, but they do have more parts (and thus more attention to manufacturing tolerances). In addition, many watch manufacturers use the tourbillon as a show-off piece, where they can exhibit their finishing skills.
If you want an affordable Tourbillon, buy a Sugess for 750$. That will either quench your desire for one immediately, or inflame it. In terms of durability: what precisely do you mean? Are you taking it on a roller coaster, or to the gun range perhaps? If you just wear it 'to the office and back', you'll be fine. A tourbillon isn't more or less fragile; it all depends on the manufacturer.
I'd say fork out the 750 for a Sugess and let us know how you feel. Lots of people seem to like them, but it does destroy the fantasy that a tourbillon is somehow more special of a complication than others. It's not...it's just a complication that is unnecessary in a wristwatch that is continually changing its position.
I don’t see that more parts equal less toughness. That’s just too simple.The more complicated the watch, the more parts it has - hence higher focus on service and less toughness.