I cannot get excited or recommend a brand that chose a parts bin name. It would be like me starting a blog called Online Blog.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Yeah, that is definitely something we have heard before. If it's worth anything we do have a brief history on how "Swiss Watch Company" came to be on the "about" page of our website. We are looking at getting the name officially changed to SWC (similar to International Watch Company IWC) but legally changing a corporation name in Switzerland is pretty tough so it could take some time before we are able to get anything changed.I cannot get excited or recommend a brand that chose a parts bin name. It would be like me starting a blog called Online Blog.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
We have looked at changing the size up but it is such a subjective view that we stuck with 44mm and shortened the lug to lug length. To be sure something like a 40mm would appeal to a broader audience though.Too big. Looks like a Seamaster and an Aquaracer had an accident. You need a logo. The entire company name on the dial is a bit much.
Thank you very much! We brought the lugs down to accommodate smaller wrists but 44mm is still considered large by today's standards. As I mentioned before, feedback helps us a lot in terms of future designs.I like the way these look and the name has already been mentioned. The size is too big for me, and in my opinion to large for this style watch. I do think these would look good on someone with a larger wrist. Thanks for showing us your product line. I will keep an eye out for future releases.
We wouldn't be where we are now without feedback! In fact the switch to the blue lume plots you mentions was a suggestion made by our followers during out campaign. Thank you very much!The sizing is fine for a diver, and 41mm is probably OK for a non-diver.
Appreciate that you guys are taking feedback and working on solutions for the logo/name. I understand it can take time to steer the ship in a different direction.
Love the color of the lume plots on the blue dial. I only wish more "classic/retro/vintage" style designs would lean into "minty toothpaste" instead of brown patina.
I am happy to hear that!I really like the bezel design. Especially in blue. Adds a nice texture to an otherwise tried and true design.
Way too big though. 48mm 9 to 3 with that broadly sloped crown guard is not just big, but enormous. What is the Lug to Lug on this (its not in your press release above)? If it is 50mm or under it can be still manageable to the masses.
Any pictures of the buckle? I really like the bracelet's look
Thank you for the feedback! And I have a brother that was born around the same time that we will bringing on board for our next model. He currently lives in Switzerland and will be handling all of our finishing work going forward.Also not keen on the name (although SWC isn't AS bad) or logo. This watch is far too large for me in diameter and thickness. The hands are a smidge too short too.
The rest of the specs look good, and I like how you've matched the lume to the colour scheme. Bracelet looks great, and the overall design is very sleek
I like the backstory, and the fact it was founded the year I was born. It will be interesting to see what else you have in the pipeline without this logo (which completely kills this for me) and in a more moderate size. Do you have any plans to go under 40mm?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm happy to hear that! We've shown off the dial of our next model to a few of our customers and it has been nearly unanimously decided that the company name should be left off the dial. So you are in good company!I like the design, I like the vibe, I like the specs and I like the fact that your dad has an established history in the industry. 44mm is a bit too large for me, but I'll be excited to see where you guys go from here. I'll admit to not loving the name, but it's certainly not a deal-breaker for me. A move toward a "logo only" dial would be a big plus.
On a side note, I love discovering brands I'm not familiar with. Maybe I fall in love with something right off the bat, maybe I don't. Regardless, it makes the industry a lot more exciting. Always a positive in my book. I wish you guys the best of luck and look forward to seeing what you come out with next.
I get what you are saying, but I can assure you we are making a profit. It isn't enough to afford selling through a third party, but it is plenty for my dad and I. Also I think $1,500 is far too high for a new brand on their first model. I would say that our quality would be fairly priced up to $800. Higher than that and I would feel we were over priced.I feel like the price is too low...it feels scammy
like if this was a $1,500 watch I'd be ok....nice, the specs def make it a good bang for your buck. But at $450, I can't help but wonder what the catch is...because the math just doesn't make sense for you to be able to offer al that for a price that low.
Free world wide shipping is $100
SW200 standard grade movement with no decoration...another $100
Case that is waterproof to 1000 feet? Another $100
Bracelet? Another $50
Dials, Superluminova, AR coating etc...another $50
"Swiss made" assembly and prototyping and boxes etc...another $50.
So where is the profit? Just feels fishy.
Throw in the scam sounding company name, and all kinds of red flags start going off.