You also forgot 6:00:00...Doh... like a good nerd, I was reviewing my post and thought something looked odd - I'm missing one value:
12:55:23
Now I feel better.
You also forgot 6:00:00...Doh... like a good nerd, I was reviewing my post and thought something looked odd - I'm missing one value:
12:55:23
Now I feel better.
Bravo sir.You also forgot 6:00:00...
yeah I wish they would too. I think they are in a good position to attempt it. They have the very popular Weekender, that's popular with young rich preppy men and women, Got a real nice boost into the upper middle class segament with their collaborations with J.Crew and Todd Snyder. I think a watch in that range also provides that halo effect on the rest of their models. I've never heard a person say "Wow you bought a Timex?" but I've had a ton of people so "Wow, that's a Timex? That's really nice" and almost always they end up going down memory lane on how their father wore a Timex, their Grandfather wore a Timex , how they had the Mickey Mouse Timex etc.Fanboys.... they're the worst. (Go Warriors)
I don't like Timex's choice to artificially limit themselves and make Nautica their next step up.
If you visit a Time Factory and handle/examine the Nauticas you can see they pick up where the IQs (previously TX) and Waterburys end.
There are some $500 Casio Edifice that are bargains, I wish Timex would step back up to the plate and fill out their range.
Also, why doesn't Casio just make a G-shock with large digits?
Or why doesn't Timex do solar/atomic?
An atomic Nautica with Indiglo and Solar would be a Timex that beats Citizen at its own game.
... Seems like even the people working at these companies have subscribed to tribal thinking and marketing.
They have not heard of Lexus (expensive Toyota), Infinity (Expensive Nissan), etc etc. All they need is a sub brand and bingo.Just for kicks,
Speaking of moving up-market, Timex' reputation and people's willingness to accept them -
To me Shinola is the luxury Timex. The design is similar and Shinola is developing as a strong 'Americana' brand (yes even with many foreign components and movements). I like the styling of both Timex and Shinola but the movements are definitely 2nd rate compared to similarly priced Japanese models. I find is weird to see such a beautiful design and finishing yet see a seconds hand that doesn't hit the markers and wobbles around.Fanboys.... they're the worst. (Go Warriors)
I don't like Timex's choice to artificially limit themselves and make Nautica their next step up.
If you visit a Time Factory and handle/examine the Nauticas you can see they pick up where the IQs (previously TX) and Waterburys end.
There are some $500 Casio Edifice that are bargains, I wish Timex would step back up to the plate and fill out their range.
Also, why doesn't Casio just make a G-shock with large digits?
Or why doesn't Timex do solar/atomic?
An atomic Nautica with Indiglo and Solar would be a Timex that beats Citizen at its own game.
... Seems like even the people working at these companies have subscribed to tribal thinking and marketing.
@Cayabo...(BTW - Nautica, Timex, Guess, Faragamo, etc... are all designed in the same building, by the same people in Italy.)
It's less scary with each time. However, I always get that inevitable thrill trying not to bend the hands and not to scratch the dialIF you can remove and replace hands.
Sweet looking linear chrono. I've been interested on these for some time. This is another model that can measure up to 24 hours right?Posted this in the new Timex thread but will post here as well. Just picked up this IQ linear chronograph:
![]()
Very very nice - first time I've seen this one. The linear chrono is my favorite version of the IQ. Though the white hands and tan numbers aren't the same, the contrasting colors make this the most legible IQ yet. I like the height variations in chapter ring, inner ring and hour hand of chrono.
FWIW - I think 40 looks great (not too small at all) on your wrist. If the 43 had a 22mm strap it would look better, but with a 20mm it looks a bit bulbous.