So after some QC difficulties with Seiko, I decided to go in a different direction. Found that insane deal on a Mido Ocean Star 200 Black, and pulled the trigger. I think it was exactly $500 shipped to my door.
Was hesitant about it, thinking maybe I'd end up returning it and trying again for another Seiko.
But the watch arrived today, and holy hell. I legitimately don't understand how this is a $500 watch. It just feels so.........EXPENSIVE. The wood box, leather liner, packaging, etc. is close to what you'd find on an IWC or an Omega. The watch itself..............people always say how watches "are comparable to watches costing 3x as much!" But in this case, I think that statement is actually true. The watch is rock solid, and it just FEELS expensive. From my initial look, everything lines up - date wheels, bezel, etc. The crystal, bracelet, bezel..............it just looks and feels like a $5000 watch. It feels much more substantial than many Omegas I've handled, and worlds better than the Seiko King Turtle. It inspires confidence that it is well-built. I'll post a review later on once I've had a chance to mess with it a bit.
HERE'S MY QUESTION:
The watch has a double-coating antireflective crystal - which I LOVE. I love the way the light plays off of it and the way it makes the dial look inky black. Likewise, it has a beautiful aluminum bezel insert.
But I bought this watch to take over "beater" duties from my Seiko Black Monster SKX779K1. Daily wear, in pools, at the beach, at bars, occasionally while sleeping, etc.
So the questions are:
1. How good is Mido's AR coating in terms of not looking banged up and having SOME degree of scratch resistance? In my experience, I have an IWC 3777-10 that I believe has external AR coating, and I haven't been able to find a single blemish in it after a few years of wear. I also have a Farer Stanhope, which I think might also have an external AR coating, but not sure. Either way, not a single blemish there either. But I do have a Raymond Weil Parsifal, that has scratches in the outer edge of the AR, which I believe were caused by me rubbing a heavily starched shirt sleeve against it to remove smudges.
2. How do aluminum bezels typically show wear? I'm sure they obviously scratch more easily than ceramic or steel bezels (like my Seiko Monster). What are your thoughts on this? Is this just a nice "patina" effect that collects memories?
Will post a full review of the watch once I have a chance, along with photographs.
Was hesitant about it, thinking maybe I'd end up returning it and trying again for another Seiko.
But the watch arrived today, and holy hell. I legitimately don't understand how this is a $500 watch. It just feels so.........EXPENSIVE. The wood box, leather liner, packaging, etc. is close to what you'd find on an IWC or an Omega. The watch itself..............people always say how watches "are comparable to watches costing 3x as much!" But in this case, I think that statement is actually true. The watch is rock solid, and it just FEELS expensive. From my initial look, everything lines up - date wheels, bezel, etc. The crystal, bracelet, bezel..............it just looks and feels like a $5000 watch. It feels much more substantial than many Omegas I've handled, and worlds better than the Seiko King Turtle. It inspires confidence that it is well-built. I'll post a review later on once I've had a chance to mess with it a bit.
HERE'S MY QUESTION:
The watch has a double-coating antireflective crystal - which I LOVE. I love the way the light plays off of it and the way it makes the dial look inky black. Likewise, it has a beautiful aluminum bezel insert.
But I bought this watch to take over "beater" duties from my Seiko Black Monster SKX779K1. Daily wear, in pools, at the beach, at bars, occasionally while sleeping, etc.
So the questions are:
1. How good is Mido's AR coating in terms of not looking banged up and having SOME degree of scratch resistance? In my experience, I have an IWC 3777-10 that I believe has external AR coating, and I haven't been able to find a single blemish in it after a few years of wear. I also have a Farer Stanhope, which I think might also have an external AR coating, but not sure. Either way, not a single blemish there either. But I do have a Raymond Weil Parsifal, that has scratches in the outer edge of the AR, which I believe were caused by me rubbing a heavily starched shirt sleeve against it to remove smudges.
2. How do aluminum bezels typically show wear? I'm sure they obviously scratch more easily than ceramic or steel bezels (like my Seiko Monster). What are your thoughts on this? Is this just a nice "patina" effect that collects memories?
Will post a full review of the watch once I have a chance, along with photographs.