WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Luminox Impressions?

4.8K views 33 replies 23 participants last post by  time4d  
#1 ·
I am looking at the Luminox XS.3253 steel cased watch and wanted impressions of any other owners of this or other Luminox watches, both positive and negative. Great price available from a couple of sources but I want knowledgeable opinions if possible.

Image
 
#2 ·
Had a couple over the years….quality is ok, tubes are useful for low light usage, but just don’t pay list for them.

Buy LNIB used at -50%.
 
#3 ·
Had one years ago. Tubes were fine, but nowhere near as bright as the average Seiko. The case was tinny and did not feel substantial to me. Sold it off and moved on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nokie
#14 ·
They are ok, middle of the road in terms of overall quality, IMHO.

Overpriced at MSRP, at least to me.
I agree about the overpriced. The one I mentioned and pictured has a Luminox MSRP of $595 per some web listings but a Amazon seller is offering it for about $235. At that price range the typical Luminox is plastic body and has a lot fewer Tritium tubes on the dial. The one pictured is all metal except for the band.
 
#7 ·
I've had several Luminox throughout the years. Including the one the OP is showing. My first was purchased around 1993 when they were headquartered in San Rafael Ca. Currently I have 3 and one automatic on the way. MSRP is crazy but it's easy to find them at much lower prices. Some can be a bit large and bulky but they have recently started making smaller sized watches.
I've never had a problem with Luminox. They seem to be well made and reliable. I recommend Luminox to anyone looking to step into the tritium world at a low price without having to worry about low quality.
 
#8 ·
A few years back I had one of their carbon case ‘Navy SEAL’ Colormark chronographs. I really liked it. Great design, solid Ronda movement, tritium tubes, very light on the wrist, etc. But I sold it because I couldn’t stand the SEAL logo on the caseback knowing full well that it wasn’t ever officially endorsed by the Navy SEALs. It was all a marketing scam, and the SEAL that did endorse it did so privately, then was later reprimanded by the USN because of the stir its caused.
 
#10 ·
Hard no from me. Had one back in about '02. One of the lugs snapped right off fly fishing - not exactly the most strenuous of activities. I wouldn't recommend. Plus, they're a little gimmicky with all the military references.
 
#11 ·
I have a 3000 series in yellow. Because of the aggressive faux military thing, the plasticky feel, the random case protrusions that server no purpose except to make it look "tough", and the glow-in-the-dark appeal, I realized it's an 80s action figure transformed into a watch. And I love it. It's a joy to wear, comfortable enough to totally disappear on the wrist. I'm wearing it now, and I can't feel it at all. The tritium is very useful in my life and feels like magic. I wish I hadn't waited so long to buy one.

Personally I wouldn't think of shelling out for the metal one because a tritium watch is pretty much inherently disposable. Plus, the plastic (carbon fiber reinforced nylon) is super comfy and light, absorbs shocks to protect the movement, and never shows scratches. But to each his own!
 
#15 · (Edited)
If you're asking for opinions, that doesn't look like a watch that an adult, or professional, military leader, husband, or father would wear. If you walked into my office or we met in an elevator, I would not ask you about that piece. It makes me cringe. It reminds me of my middle school watches or something from Burger King. Quality wise, I appreciate that brand's marketing but the quality physically and relatively isn't there.

I assume you have about $500 to spend on this format?
You should buy a $200 G Shock + $300 Seiko.
 
#18 ·
If you're asking for opinions, that doesn't look like a watch that an adult, or professional, military leader, husband, or father would wear. If you walked into my office or we met in an elevator, I would not ask you about that piece. It makes me cringe. It reminds me of my middle school watches or something from Burger King. Quality wise, I appreciate that brand's marketing but the quality physically and relatively isn't there.

I assume you have about $500 to spend on this format?
You should buy a $200 G Shock + $300 Seiko.
As a 79 year old DOM I am not too worried about looks and the pictured watch is at least all steel and includes 16 total tritium tubes including one on the bezel. Far better than the cheaper Luminox watches with 4 dial tubes and one on each hand. I have plenty of dressier watches so not too concerned with looks, just function.
 
#24 ·
I had a metal cased Luminox. Water ingress via the caseback after about 3 years of owning it. Not especially remarkable with regards to the build quality. My citizen and casio steel watches feel more substantial. My son has a 15 year old Navy Seal and it still works great without any servicing other than battery changes. The tubes no longer glow as to be expected for a watch that old.
 
#26 ·
I'm no physicist (uh-oh, this is how useless posts often start), but:
  • 1), was the water really that hot? You'd have to be scalding yourself by the sound of it;
  • 2), how long were you showering for? As far as I know, it takes a while for an object to assume the temperature of its environment. I remember Casio stating in their manuals that you need to take off your watch for at least 20 minutes in order to get an accurate reading from the temperature sensor.

And, finally, 3), shouldn't all that be engineered for? I'm sure it could be - your quote from Luminox's manual sounds a bit of an excuse to me...
Well, it was a Luminox, which have had problems in the past.
I'm no physicist (uh-oh, this is how useless posts often start), but:
  • 1), was the water really that hot? You'd have to be scalding yourself by the sound of it;
  • 2), how long were you showering for? As far as I know, it takes a while for an object to assume the temperature of its environment. I remember Casio stating in their manuals that you need to take off your watch for at least 20 minutes in order to get an accurate reading from the temperature sensor.

And, finally, 3), shouldn't all that be engineered for? I'm sure it could be - your quote from Luminox's manual sounds a bit of an excuse to me...
Well it was a Luminox, which has had problems in the past...
 
#27 ·
Well, it was a Luminox, which have had problems in the past.

Well it was a Luminox, which has had problems in the past...
Why I originally posted as I read one review that claimed that the owner had some of the tritium vials come unglued from the dial. Having worked i QA for years I know that every manufacturer can have occasional quality problems but some are worse than others. Years ago the Japanese made their reputation by having much better than average quality.
 
#30 ·
Agreed on the retail price but to me this applies to a great many watches. I got the watch pictured in post 1 from an Amazon seller for $235 + tax rather than the Luminox supposed MSRP of circa $675, a ridiculous price in my opinion. I note that the luminous gas tubes are not nearly as bright as high end luminous coatings when fully charged as used in better dive watches such as NFW and Citizen so require my eyes to be dark adapted to be visible. My NFW Shumate watches have the best luminous coatings I have experienced.
 
#32 ·
I picked up a pure black Luminox Military Sea Lion with green accents and numbers two weeks ago.
Highly recommend it for the following list of reasons because I have had 5 other military style watches previously:

1) Carbonox - the case and bezel are 5 times lighter and tougher/scratch resistant than titanium (you guys with stainless steel? Watch out what happens in 3 years)

2) Tritium- wow so much better and brighter than luminescence

3) 330 feet water resistance - perfect for military specs
Normal air in a tank is poisonous after 200 ft underwater

4) US Navy Seals can't be wrong - good enough for them, good enough for me

5) it's just more beautiful than the rest" case design, shape, numerals, colours


6) Price - skip the G Shock
 

Attachments

#34 ·
My not-so-knowledgeable opinion is as what some have already pointed out:

1. Look for one at a good price; don't bother paying retail
2. "Military", "Navy Seal" and the like are just marketing. Set your expectations accordingly. You're not buying a G-shock.
3. From all the tests and comparisons I've done, tritium is always great for night use, even T25 (unless you are doing secret military ops). Don't let anyone tell you otherwise
4. A steel Luminox is still a Luminox, nothing more or less