[maki57]

I've read a lot of the threads here about the 2824 or the 2836 having issues with frequent hand-winding. Following up on that, would there potentially be similar issues with the 2893 and the other 2890 movements? I may have not searched deeply enough, but I can't seem to find anything going in depth with the winding on the 2890 series.

I keep my mechanicals wound every day and would like to be informed just in case any future purchases might be affected by potential issues. That goes especially so if I want to keep service costs down.

 

[dkbs]

I have a Bvlgari 2892-A2 sitting on the desk as backup, has been manually wound every night for more than 2 years. At the third year I disassembled and oiled and cleaned and inspected every part -- nothing wrong. The only part I replaced is the barrel because early version will not click when fully wound.

Those "threads" are rumors created by Japanese to defame Swiss watch industry.

I've read a lot of the threads here about the 2824 or the 2836 having issues with frequent hand-winding. Following up on that, would there potentially be similar issues with the 2893 and the other 2890 movements? I may have not searched deeply enough, but I can't seem to find anything going in depth with the winding on the 2890 series.

I keep my mechanicals wound every day and would like to be informed just in case any future purchases might be affected by potential issues. That goes especially so if I want to keep service costs down.

 

[pithy]

. . . . Those "threads" are rumors created by Japanese to defame Swiss watch industry.

So now I'm working for the Japanese?

The chinese must have sold my contract.

 

[maki57]

Those "threads" are rumors created by Japanese to defame Swiss watch industry.

Ironically, I'm only looking into 2893-powered watches because there aren't many Japanese mechanical GMTs in production that I can afford at the moment.

So now I'm working for the Japanese?

The chinese must have sold my contract.

As a matter of fact, the reason I made a new topic was because after going through "the threads", including your own posts, I couldn't find significant references for the 2893. I assume it's not part of the contract :-!