WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

My thinnest watch is a.......Timex?

1 reading
14K views 29 replies 10 participants last post by  Addictedtowatches  
#1 · (Edited)
Ok so I had a pretty awesome find today at a local flea market. I spotted this guy on a table from a good distance and knew right away what it was and that I was going home with it. "IT" happens to be a Timex, but not just any old Timex. It is a Timex Elite, with a Swiss movement and French case and the thinnest ever made by them. Not only is this watch uncommon(dare I say rare), but it even had its original box and sleeve. :-! It is quartz and takes a Timex Z cell or an Energizer 370/71 in today's batteries, but upon instillation it is unfortunately not running:-(.
Now I've only ever heard of these and there is little info I can find online. I couldn't care less about its value because this one is staying in the collection. Here are some quick pics:
 

Attachments

#2 ·
Hi Addictedtowatches,

Thats an elegant looking watch you have there and a great find.Just looking over the photos in particular
the date window looks like the inexperienced folk have already been inside and maybe that`s why it is not running.Any
chance of a movement pic.
cheers,
Apollonaught.
 
#3 ·
I actually had it apart before to fix the date wheel. Someone put a gear in upside down... Anyway I don't think i want to dismantle it anymore for a movement pic and the case back is almost built into the movement anyway. It's a shame someone played with it.
 
#4 ·
Yes it is a shame,it sounds tricky to work on and wise not to risk further damage.I have a very thin seiko quartz watch and after
three attemps at replacing the battery i finally got it.I have heard somewhere that a greasy thumb print on the battery can be enough to break its tiny circuit.

All the best,
Apollonaught.
 
#10 ·
It's cool, it's thin, but it's not this thin...

Image
 
#15 ·
Here's the one off the bay.

Image


And here's the link to the original auction, you can cry like I did at the price then...

Bulova Phantom | eBay
 
  • Like
Reactions: JP71624
#19 · (Edited)
Bulova didn't hold the record for long, the Seiko came out in 1980, then later the same year Seiko was beaten by Concord's Delirium, at 0.98 mm.

The Delirium could not actually be worn for any amount of time, as the movement was so fragile any strain on the band broke the movement.
The Seiko was ugly, I think, so the Bulova is still the winner in my eyes!

Image


Image
 
  • Like
Reactions: JP71624 and busmatt
#25 ·
These aren't quartz...but I thought my mechanical watches were fairly thin (and that's with a domed crystal...without the plastic and angled lugs...they're fairly thin anyway!).

They aren't anything close to yours, though!

Image


Image
 
#27 · (Edited)
Thanks, buddy!

'59 Sea King on top, '63 Surf King on the bottom!

Image


Image


I, however, was not trying to hijack your thread! Just wanted to share what are my thinnest watches -- no where close to yours!!