[31671]

Thinking of buying S100 or T200. I like visually S100 considerably more! However, I like the bluetooth functionality of T200. Now, I have a question that could help me decide.

What is the purpose of setting DST when traveling? Can't someone just set the time without setting the DST? I ask as I do not like the fact that I would have to set the DST with a pin in S100 on my relatively frequent flights. What is more, in Europe, where I am from, this year the DST will be changed. So I would like to understand why would anyone mess around with DST instead setting the time to the correct hour, irrespective if the hour matches the time zone of the city written on the watch. I understand when someone would set the DST to AUTO so that when they are in their home city the time changes automatically, but during travels I see no reason to mess around with it on the S100 when you do not even see the time zone apart when in setting mode. With the T200 it is a different story - sync with the phone and it is done, or at least you can set DST with the button without using a sharp object. So, I will continue considering the S100 only if the DST is irrelevant for me during my flights in the destination country.

Thanks!

 

[usclassic]

Thinking of buying S100 or T200. I like visually S100 considerably more! However, I like the bluetooth functionality of T200. Now, I have a question that could help me decide.

What is the purpose of setting DST when traveling? Can't someone just set the time without setting the DST? I ask as I do not like the fact that I would have to set the DST with a pin in S100 on my relatively frequent flights. What is more, in Europe, where I am from, this year the DST will be changed. So I would like to understand why would anyone mess around with DST instead setting the time to the correct hour, irrespective if the hour matches the time zone of the city written on the watch. I understand when someone would set the DST to AUTO so that when they are in their home city the time changes automatically, but during travels I see no reason to mess around with it on the S100 when you do not even see the time zone apart when in setting mode. With the T200 it is a different story - sync with watch and it is done, or at least you can set DST with the button without using a sharp object.

Thanks!

I prefer the s100. Set the DST to auto and forget about it. If I were to travel I would simply use the crown to find the correct time zone. My s100 is still perfectly accurate after several months with auto time sync turned off. So if I were to travel I still know I have the correct time to the second regardless of radio signal availability which also saves power by not hunting for a signal every night. You will be looking at the watch a lot more than setting it so get the one that appeals more to you.

 

[31671]

You will be looking at the watch a lot more than setting it so get the one that appeals more to you.

This I agree with, but when I will be looking at it I will evaluate with my heart and my brain. So the aspect of having the right functionality is important. Still, being a quartz watch, it will be accurate enough, I agree. It is true that when I travel I can just set the time by turning the crown to whatever hour is the correct one. However, this defeats the purpose of having time zones and DST altogether. Also, I do not get the signals from MB6 where I live. In this way, S100 will be for me a really nice quartz watch that I will manually set to the correct time and manually adjust when I travel. The only functionality I will use is that I will adjust during my travels with a whole hour, not compromising accuracy.

With the T200 I will have auto sync with my phone so the time will by auto adjusting, when I travel I can syn with phone or manually adjust to the correct time zone + DST. In this way, I will use the full functionalities of auto sync and world time + DST. This appeals to me. I still like T200 a lot, just like S100 more. Putting all together - my heart and my brain - I think I am leaning towards T200. I cannot see them physically, so I will have to decide looking at pictures and videos.

By the way, I just noticed that T200 is Titanium carbide coated although it is a steel watch. Did not know this was an option. Does this mean that T200 is as hard to scratch as S100? Thanks

 

[ED209]

By the way, I just noticed that T200 is Titanium carbide coated although it is a steel watch. Did not know this was an option. Does this mean that T200 is as hard to scratch as S100? Thanks

From what I can remember, this seemed to be bad info from the seller I linked to, and it's just a regular steel case.

 

[31671]

It is on the Japanese site:
https://translate.googleusercontent...0022,15700186,15700190,15700256,15700259&usg=ALkJrhgaPqpsgzZspcWnT-vlqE5unlG5bg

 

[usclassic]

This I agree with, but when I will be looking at it I will evaluate with my heart and my brain. So the aspect of having the right functionality is important. Still, being a quartz watch, it will be accurate enough, I agree. It is true that when I travel I can just set the time by turning the crown to whatever hour is the correct one. However, this defeats the purpose of having time zones and DST altogether. Also, I do not get the signals from MB6 where I live. In this way, S100 will be for me a really nice quartz watch that I will manually set to the correct time and manually adjust when I travel. The only functionality I will use is that I will adjust during my travels with a whole hour, not compromising accuracy.

With the T200 I will have auto sync with my phone so the time will by auto adjusting, when I travel I can syn with phone or manually adjust to the correct time zone + DST. In this way, I will use the full functionalities of auto sync and world time + DST. This appeals to me. I still like T200 a lot, just like S100 more. Putting all together - my heart and my brain - I think I am leaning towards T200. I cannot see them physically, so I will have to decide looking at pictures and videos.

By the way, I just noticed that T200 is Titanium carbide coated although it is a steel watch. Did not know this was an option. Does this mean that T200 is as hard to scratch as S100? Thanks

You will also be surprised by the weight different the T200 is stainless steel I think the coating information is a website error. The s100 is titanium with beautiful zaratsu polished bezel and so lightweight it is the more comfortable of the two for sure.

 

[usclassic]

Watch information
brand OCEANUS (Ocianus)
Model number OCW-T200S-1AJF
Model number OCW-T200S-1AJF
Release year 2019
Case shape Round face
Windshield material Sapphire glass
Display type Analog display
Clasp Three fold push type clasp
Case material stainless
Case diameter and width 41.4 mm
Case thickness 10.7 mm
Band material / type Stainless steel bracelet type
Band leader Approximately 15 to 19.5 cm
Band color Silver
Dial face color black
Bezel material Stainless steel
Calendar function Fully automatic calendar, date display
Body weight 132 g
Movement Quartz

Watch information
brand OCEANUS (Oshianasu)
Model number OCW - S100 - 1 AJF
Model number OCW - S100 - 1 AJF
Release year 2012
Windshield material Sapphire glass
Display Type Analog display
Clasp Three fold push type clasp
Case material titanium
Case diameter / width 41.5 millimeters
Case thickness 10.5 millimeters
Band Material · Type Titanium bracelet type
Band length About 15 to 20.5 cm
Band color Silver
Dial color black
Calendar function Date display
Other functions Solar radio clock, world time, night light index
Body weight 91 g
Movement Quartz

 

[warsh]

This I agree with, but when I will be looking at it I will evaluate with my heart and my brain. So the aspect of having the right functionality is important. Still, being a quartz watch, it will be accurate enough, I agree. It is true that when I travel I can just set the time by turning the crown to whatever hour is the correct one. However, this defeats the purpose of having time zones and DST altogether. Also, I do not get the signals from MB6 where I live. In this way, S100 will be for me a really nice quartz watch that I will manually set to the correct time and manually adjust when I travel. The only functionality I will use is that I will adjust during my travels with a whole hour, not compromising accuracy.

With the T200 I will have auto sync with my phone so the time will by auto adjusting, when I travel I can syn with phone or manually adjust to the correct time zone + DST. In this way, I will use the full functionalities of auto sync and world time + DST. This appeals to me. I still like T200 a lot, just like S100 more. Putting all together - my heart and my brain - I think I am leaning towards T200. I cannot see them physically, so I will have to decide looking at pictures and videos.

By the way, I just noticed that T200 is Titanium carbide coated although it is a steel watch. Did not know this was an option. Does this mean that T200 is as hard to scratch as S100? Thanks

You can use the clock wave app so that your T100 can connect and sync time even when out of radio signal range

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[31671]

removed

 

[31671]

You will be looking at the watch a lot more than setting it so get the one that appeals more to you.

Thanks for all the replies!

After trying to understand and analyse how the S100 is setup and how to adjust when traveling, I am mostly in peace now So I will definitely get it instead of the T200. I started looking at GPS watches like citizen f150 and came accross S100 and fell in love with it. So although T200 is better from functional point of view, S100 is enough for me - a tough solar and tough movement, titanium (would be the first for me), calendar, world time, radio signal sync. And the dial is just gorgeous! Together with my G shock B5000 and my Fortis 38 mm cosmonauts chronograph I will have everything I need in great quality - mechanical, travel, tough, sporty, dress, casual and with ton of functions.

Congrats to all the owners of T200 - an amazing watch, but my heart and money go to S100 as for me T200 would be just a great watch, where as S100 will be a special one

P.S. If you want to check out the two models side by side you can watch this video (in Russian)

 

[warsh]

Awesome!! Seeing the two side by side is super helpful. Someone reported the Lug to lug on the S200 at 49.5mm. I haven't measured my S100, but can't believe it is that long. Yet when you see the two together in this video, they look very similar in size. Does someone have definitive L2L measurements for both that they can post??

For me, the S200 is a better looking watch, and I'd seriously consider trading up. However, if its case is much bigger than the S100, I might just hold onto my S100.

Thanks for all the replies!

After trying to understand and analyse how the S100 is setup and how to adjust when traveling, I am mostly in peace now So I will definitely get it instead of the T200. I started looking at GPS watches like citizen f150 and came accross S100 and fell in love with it. So although T200 is better from functional point of view, S100 is enough for me - a tough solar and tough movement, titanium (would be the first for me), calendar, world time, radio signal sync. And the dial is just gorgeous! Together with my G shock B5000 and my Fortis 38 mm cosmonauts chronograph I will have everything I need in great quality - mechanical, travel, tough, sporty, dress, casual and with ton of functions.

Congrats to all the owners of T200 - an amazing watch, but my heart and money go to S100 as for me T200 would be just a great watch, where as S100 will be a special one

P.S. If you want to check out the two models side by side you can watch this video (in Russian)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Adventureman]

Awesome!! Seeing the two side by side is super helpful. Someone reported the Lug to lug on the S200 at 49.5mm. I haven't measured my S100, but can't believe it is that long. Yet when you see the two together in this video, they look very similar in size. Does someone have definitive L2L measurements for both that they can post??

It was me who reported 49.5mm which I measured with digital calipers. The S100 measures 45mm lug-to-lug.

I will have a full review of the new T200 ready later today.

 

[warsh]

It was me who reported 49.5mm which I measured with digital calipers. The S100 measures 45mm lug-to-lug.

I will have a full review of the new T200 ready later today.

Thanks for that info, although what a pity, as it makes the watch (S200) a no go for me. Still, I look forward to your review. If you have any insights into why Casio decided to make the case so much longer for this new model, hope you will share those w us.....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Adventureman]

The case size is 41mm (2 mm bigger than the S100) and each lug is 1 mm longer so that adds 4 mm to the total lug-to-lug. It's bot really that much of a difference. I prefer the larger L2L because it makes the watch move around less on my wrist.

The review is available here: Casio Oceanus OCW-T200S review - Watches - Horology.World

 

[warsh]

The case size is 41mm (2 mm bigger than the S100) and each lug is 1 mm longer so that adds 4 mm to the total lug-to-lug. It's bot really that much of a difference. I prefer the larger L2L because it makes the watch move around less on my wrist.

The review is available here: Casio Oceanus OCW-T200S review - Watches - Horology.World

Thanks for an excellent review. Very informative.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[31671]

Thanks for the review!

 

[31671]

T200 is TiC coated, which as I understand makes the watch more scratch resistant in comparison to stainless steel, right? Still, I expect some scratches with time, so I am curious if it would be possible to polish and brush it keeping in mind the TiC treatment. Does anybody know if this would be possible?

 

[beansandcornbread]

My fancy has been tickled. I'll get some more pics soon.

 

[tomchicago]

Casio continues to kill it with the Oceanus line. They should dump Edifice here in the USA and sell Oceanus.

 

[angrypossum]

The case size is 41mm (2 mm bigger than the S100) and each lug is 1 mm longer so that adds 4 mm to the total lug-to-lug. It's bot really that much of a difference. I prefer the larger L2L because it makes the watch move around less on my wrist.

The review is available here: Casio Oceanus OCW-T200S review - Watches - Horology.World

Thanks for the excellent review. I've been struggling to decide between the S100 and the T200, your review certainly helps a lot.
If it's alright, I'd like to ask what your wrist size is to get a sense of how large the T200 wears.
My concern is I have a relatively small wrist (6.1 inches or so), and I'm worried that as much as I prefer the T200 for its angular look, I might not be able to pull off the 49mm lug-to-lug. From your profile shot in the review, it looks like the lugs don't bend downward much either.
Thanks