WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

New GW-M5610U, GW-5000U, GW-S5600U, G-5600U "Speed Model Series"

181650 Views 727 Replies 144 Participants Last post by  robbish1
From G-Central.

G-Shock 5000 U Series including GW-5000U-1

G-Shock, News

A reliable source has a new "Speed Model Series" listed for July 2021 in Japan. Though not all of the details are available, it includes three GW-M5610U models, one GW-5000U, one GW-S5600U, and one G-5600U, for a total of six watches.

Upon further searching, we found that the GW-M5610U-1 and GW-M5610U-1B (as the GW-M5610U-1ER and GW-M5610U-1BER, €129 each) are listed on some European retailer sites. We also found a search result for the GW-5000U-1 (as the GW-5000U-1ER, €299) from an official European G-Shock site, but that page is not currently active. The original source has a GW-S5600U-1JF listed, but we could not find any other results for this or a G-5600U. No images are currently available, but they should be soon.

See the rest of the article here.

  • Like
Reactions: 5
1 - 12 of 728 Posts
I like my gw m5610 but I allways missed the current time/stopwatch, counting timer mode so I am ready to buy the upgrade.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
In this photo, the text on the 5000 appears to be much sharper than the text on the 5610.

I remember reading that looking at a G-Shock from the left side (while on your left wrist, for a right-handed person) tends to be crisper than looking at the watch on the right side, so I was wondering if it was due to the viewing angle, or because the 5000 is more legible / put together slightly differently?
It's a bit funny seeing all theese 4 watches received radio signal at the same time but the one on the left running 2 sec fast :)
  • Like
Reactions: 1
thanks for theese detaild pictures! now everyone can see at least the cases slightly different. I don't think there is any difference on the screen.
I don't think the cases are different? Just a trick of the camera.
I'd say this is just a photo artifact.
It is very difficult to take a proper picture of the screen without the right equipment

Theese pictures clearly show the slight differencies I meant. the guard between the buttons on the side bigger on the m5610 and the part below and above the buttons has different shape.
Ah, yeah we all know the GW-5000 and GW-M5610 are different. I thought you meant the 'OG' 5610 vs the new 5610U.
okay, my bad.
so Casio updated the modules and put it in the old cases + bezel + strap, and called it a day
as simple as that but people here are making so much noises with their expectations, imaginations, and whatnots
HONESTLY, after reading this whole thread, I lost respect to a lot of G-shock veterans in this forum: YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER with your intelligence and experience
:) You're right! I'm here to collect useful informations but reading some of the comments really hurts.
I don't quite see why analyzing every detail is a problem. In fact, I'm disappointed some folks are bothered that we are going over the watch with an electron microscope. Part of it is excitement that popular fan watches are getting some change, even if it is relatively minor. It's all in good fun and part of the hobby.

Further, the module in these squares has not been updated in over a decade, so it is a big deal, at least for square fans. If anyone follows Rolex, they go over the tiniest changes to the dial size, font, etc. with each new model. There are fiery debates, for example, over whether a watch should be 36mm or 39mm, whether the font is too thick or too thin. To the outsider, these debates look ridiculous. To the fan, it's part of the fun.

If people do not understand that, then I am amazed that it surprises them, especially if they frequent these forums. It does, however, disappoint me to when people are outright disappointed that we are simply just doing watch idiots do -- go over the fine details, bellyache when are expectations are not met, and share excitement for incremental changes to much beloved watches.
I don't quite see why analyzing every detail is a problem. In fact, I'm disappointed some folks are bothered that we are going over the watch with an electron microscope. Part of it is excitement that popular fan watches are getting some change, even if it is relatively minor. It's all in good fun and part of the hobby.

Further, the module in these squares has not been updated in over a decade, so it is a big deal, at least for square fans. If anyone follows Rolex, they go over the tiniest changes to the dial size, font, etc. with each new model. There are fiery debates, for example, over whether a watch should be 36mm or 39mm, whether the font is too thick or too thin. To the outsider, these debates look ridiculous. To the fan, it's part of the fun.

If people do not understand that, then I am amazed that it surprises them, especially if they frequent these forums. It does, however, disappoint me to when people are outright disappointed that we are simply just doing watch idiots do -- go over the fine details, bellyache when are expectations are not met, and share excitement for incremental changes to much beloved watches.
I hear you! I might be some of those "folks":) you've mentioned I was probably in the wrong place in a wrong time or something.I was just trying collect usefull information about this new modul I'm really digging. that's all. I am really sorry that you had to read someone else's comment about a nit-picking-useless-yack-yack comments about this watch:))
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Someone's useless yack yack comments could be their way of finding information or just expressing their opinions, even if they are ill-informed. I see a lot of such speculation when new watches are newly released. Just part of the discussion. Gradually the truth emerges as folks get their hands on the watch.

As long as people aren't being rude, I don't see an issue. Just skip the post if it isn't informative.

If you are having an especially hard time finding information you're looking for, ask a question - a lot of us are here to help.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
the most remote thing to beeng rude
the most remote thing from me to being rude and I had just an opinion.
just received my gw 5000u.... wow!... switched from an old gw-m5610 what I really liked and this is why I allways think about buying this premium modell. I have to say that I will never regret this decision :) this watch is totally diferent league compare to the other squares. seriously. and I actually plan to beat the hell out of this thing in the next years (decades)
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5
a bit odd thing happened today.... the watch can't have the signal by itself. that is allright because I live in a building hard to get or whatever. Anyway I can force the watch to get the signal manually from some other place. ok. I did the same procedure today, watch got signal, RCVD appeared on display-everithing is normal. But RCVD disappeared couple hours later! not 1stWproblem I just think it's unusual that is all. I've got some experience with multiband G-Shocks and I never experienced this.
I have this gw 5000u and this is the almost perfect g-shock for me. I miss the old backlight though and this watch is on the heavy side compare to the other sqares. So if casio would make this model in titanium casing I'd be the first to buy it.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
1 - 12 of 728 Posts
Top