WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner
81 - 100 of 118 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Yes positive module only available in the surplus at this time. Depending on the light angle the dial will be anywhere from bright green, dull green or a tan colour. The tan colour matches the tan case perfectly.The first photo below is pretty accurate showing the tan colour. I'm very happy with the module swap.


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Did Nixon swap the module? Or you did it yourself? Because I’ve a regulus in multicam with surplus module in it and Nixon customer support say they don’t sell customised Regulus.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,457 Posts
I haven't written posts on a watch forum for many years, let's say there are many reasons, and certainly, nobody cares, but this hasn't stopped me from continuing to be updated and following WUS, which is undoubtedly my landmark.

Anyone who knows me and has followed me knows that I've always been passionate about G-Shock and I also collect watches from other manufacturers that belong to what we can define as "space watches", but not only that, I've never had any preconceptions, I wear an F-91 one day and the next day I can wear a 1016 or a 105.003, a Citizen Promaster or an unknown brand, just because I like the quartz module of it.

I like the "concept of measuring time" and any instrument that measures it is for me fascinating.

My experience with G-Shocks began in the early 90s and I also had the honor of personally meeting Mr. Ibe, having visited the Casio headquarters in Tokyo.
I also gave Mr. Ibe a self-produced photo book of photos of my G-Shocks and had the pleasure of keeping one for myself, autographed by him.

Therefore I assume that my experience with this type of watch helps me in this comment.

I found this post, which I read thoroughly and I really liked the opener's approach and his experience both in the field and with this watch, the so-called REGULUS.
I like long, detailed posts, with comments and impressions, and points of view, many times I have been challenged for this, but in certain forums, you know, that's the way it is.

Excuse me if I add a comment after so long.

Even when the REGULUS came out, I decided to buy it, I immediately liked it even if I never thought it was a competitor to G-Shock and I think it has already been widely discussed.

I can't say that I was as NOT lucky as the opener with my first REGULUS (exactly identical to that of the opener), after a few days my REGULUS suddenly "turned off" (it's not the service function, unfortunately) and I think I have had the worst customer care experience of my life.
I think that, from what I've read, the US customer service seems valid, much less the European one: I decided that I would never again in my life want to deal with NIXON.

So I sent the watch back and got a refund after a long odyssey.

But the REGULUS itself is not to blame for all this, so I had the opportunity to get a used one for a few euros, and this time it worked well (at least for now).
I found the version I liked best, the one with a positive display.

I won't go into reviews, since it has been widely discussed.

I just want to dwell on the MK-1 that I received a few days ago.

On this too, I would not like to add anything else to what is known, except that it is very beautiful and well made and that I find it much better, aesthetically than the "civilian" version (although today it is possible to buy it the MK-1 freely on the NIXON website at a very advantageous figure even if you are not an "operator").

I will only add the negative points which, in my opinion, make it an "incomprehensible" watch if designed for operators or "by operators".

• why is the second time zone missing?
• why is the countdown timer missing?
• why has the date remained reversed giving priority to the month?
• why still keep the screw-on spring bars when it is clear that those who have tried to replace them have often snapped their heads making it almost difficult to wear with a NATO?
(Maybe marking the correct part to unscrew with a reference would have been better?)

To resume, anyone could explain the reason for Nixon staff "downgraded" the module while the same module of the "civilian" version makes the landmark for this model?

Obviously, not being an "operator", I have no way of understanding whether the philosophy of simplicity (intended as a downgrade of functions) has actually been taken into consideration for the MK-1 or whether instead it is just a matter of marketing (and, if so, no problem for me, because I understand the commercial dynamics of a brand very well and they don't create any problems for me) but it would be nice to share your opinions.

In any case, I love the REGULUS, I wear it regularly in my daily training and hiking activity in combination with my Garmin Instinct Tactical and I am fully satisfied with it.

Thanks for your attention.


Watch Font Material property Computer data storage Clock

Automotive tire Font Camera accessory Camera lens Cameras & optics

Font Material property Art Handwriting Graphics

Watch Analog watch Light Clock Font
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,457 Posts
An update after using the MK-1 for a while.

The new design is definitely better, as it is thinner and got a different "feeling" on the buttons, I can say the watch is better than the original REGULUS in terms of design and user experience on the wrist.
The new strap is better than the previous one, despite the screw spring bar are always a problem knowing that many users have broken them in the previous version... I am afraid to try to swap on a NATO because it is well knows that NIXON would not provide a new spring bar for the MK-1 if they have broken.

The big problem remains the module.

I found the contrast not bad, even if not good as the GARMIN INSTINCT (different technology of course) or just the Casio GD-350-1BER that I own, but I can manage that, I use it for trekking and outdoor/indoor activities and it is sufficiently visible.

The understandable aspect is why they "downgrade" the module.

• NO 2ND TZ

• NO COUNTDOWN TIMERS

While the two independent chrono are always interesting on many daily occasions if you work with tasks, timing several events, and so on... I could not understand why they decide to not use the module of the standard REGULUS.

Unless a member of the Army or a serviceman told us if this decision made sense for some "technical" reasons (given they said the MK-1 was at the beginning available only for members of the Armies) I think this will be an unsolved question for a long time.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
361 Posts
Well i think it is worth for the looks. Other than that and apart from the two chronos i don't see any real advantage on this watch.
I find myself too often being obliged to push the glow button because i cannot see the time, i am a bit fed up with that.
"Military only" i think it is more a marketing trick than anything else.
There has been very few watches only available for the military i think (exept first Panerais, IWC , one Sinn and my Northern diver proto: Rare Northern Diver prototype Special Forces Combat Swimmer ) and they usually all end up being sold to the public.
I regret the module is Made in China (but what is not today? A though to have...) and it is vey clearly engraved on the case back.
Again, the watch really on for the looks.
Watch Gesture Grey Clock Automotive tire
Water Sky Cloud Boats and boating--Equipment and supplies Outdoor recreation
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,457 Posts
I absolutely agree on the fact that the MK-1 cannot be considered a "military" watch (in the sense of the term "military issued" by an administration) after all, the idea that today only those watches can still be considered "military" because they were/are "issued" has been largely superseded by the reality of the facts: always, at least since the existence of the wristwatch, the military have worn civilian watches, it has been seen since the first wars and it can be seen today where from the Casio F- 91 to the most famous mechanical even luxury watches, each one, in the operational theaters, brings to the seat what he wants and what best satisfies his needs.

For years I have no longer categorized watches as military or non-military: I always prefer to say "watches chosen by the operators" and then I'll try or study to understand what the needs that made them choose them are.

And here we go back to the fact that NIXON, (even if it was just for marketing, and this si a possibility of course) originally created a watch that technically could very well compete with other timepieces of the same category (G-Shock, Timex, Suunto, and so on) and meet the needs in the operating theater (Zulu time and countdown timer available in the module of the first version) and then degraded it to a simple timepiece, removing the more "operative" features.
 

· Registered
Samsung Galaxy Watch4, G-Shock GAS100, Fossil Branson Hybrid, Suunto Core All Black
Joined
·
18 Posts
I absolutely agree on the fact that the MK-1 cannot be considered a "military" watch (in the sense of the term "military issued" by an administration) after all, the idea that today only those watches can still be considered "military" because they were/are "issued" has been largely superseded by the reality of the facts: always, at least since the existence of the wristwatch, the military have worn civilian watches, it has been seen since the first wars and it can be seen today where from the Casio F- 91 to the most famous mechanical even luxury watches, each one, in the operational theaters, brings to the seat what he wants and what best satisfies his needs.

For years I have no longer categorized watches as military or non-military: I always prefer to say "watches chosen by the operators" and then I'll try or study to understand what the needs that made them choose them are.

And here we go back to the fact that NIXON, (even if it was just for marketing, and this si a possibility of course) originally created a watch that technically could very well compete with other timepieces of the same category (G-Shock, Timex, Suunto, and so on) and meet the needs in the operating theater (Zulu time and countdown timer available in the module of the first version) and then degraded it to a simple timepiece, removing the more "operative" features.
I believe the reasons for the change is because it had to be built in a different factory than the "civilian" Regulus. For it to be considered and picked up for a US Govt contract, it has to either be manufactured in the US or in a US TAA (Trade Agreement Act) "friendly" country. The Regulus is made in China, with that "movement" while the MK-1 is made in either HK or Taiwan, so it is possible that they had to remove features to meet the USGI requirement.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,457 Posts
Mk-1 is Made in China, it is carved in big on the case!
My MK-1 say “cased in China” so it can be a possibility that the movement comes from another factory and the watch was just “assembled” in China.

Also are we sure that the MK-1 that’s available to everyone in the Nixon e-store (here in EU available for €150) is the same they made for U.S. Govt.?

Anyway, assuming they are identical and that for some reasons the specs. for US Govt. force Nixon to decrease the amount of features, any idea why a “issued” watch (if we can use this wording) should not have a 2nd timezone or a countdown timer if those was solid part of the “civilian” version that was (as Nixon say) “developed in coop with special forces members”?

In my opinion this is the main question.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
248 Posts
OK before we start this thread, I wanted to give a very quick preface. First off, I have been into watches since around 10 years old when my dad used to have work done to modify his Patek and Rolex and wouldn't shut up about it. This was the early 80's before the net, so he'd talk about it to anyone who'd listen, including a 10 year old boy who just wanted to play baseball and make fart noises with his armpits. I am also a vet. I served 12 years in the USAF Security Forces, once called Security Police, and previously known as the Air Police or Provost Marshall. I served from 1995 to 2007. In that time I performed varied tasks such as standing armed at the foot of Air Force 1 in my best dress uniform, to law enforcement patrol and first responder duties to combat schools in the US and S. Korea. I've deployed multiple times for real world and training purposes. In 2003, as a part of OIF I performed convoy route protection and QRF duties between Kuwait and Iraq. I am NOT a Special Forces soldier, yet, due to my job and pure luck, I have been fortunate to get some of the best training in firearms, tactics, field operations etc and so forth. So while I'm not some dude HALO jumping into an enemy compound at zero dark thirty, I have a lot of experience in the field and I am confident I can review related gear. I've broken some of the coolest stuff you can get. lol

OK with that over, let me get to the meat here. I KNOW NIXON IS A FASHION BRAND. (sorry for the yelling), I'm not here to sell anyone a watch, and I don't work for Nixon or anyone affiliated with them. I just found this watch by accident as I was going down the very familiar spiral we all head down at 11pm, while watching nonsense on YouTube before bed. That is literally it.... I never would consider a Nixon before finding this watch. I was almost embarrassed to admit I was going to actively check this watch out. My current small stable of watches consists of a few Citizen Promaster offerings including the Tough, an Orient dress watch, and my Seiko Tuna-lite. Not very impressive I know, but I've owned a few decent mid range watches from TAG and a higher end Victorinox. My dad was the luxury watch guy, although he just wears a Concord Mariner now and has since stopped with the high end stuff.

OK, so I see this product video with some ex SEAL badass selling you on a "team designed" blah blah blah blah blah, OK STFU already right? But I was actually curious..... I recently wanted to get a digital since my 2 year old wants to destroy everything he touches and I just needed something durable, easy to use and slightly "tacticool" (in the military we used to call it Gucciflage, and I'm surprised that isn't used more than Tacticool). I ordered a few G-Shocks to try out (Mudman, Rangeman with negative display, GA2000, which is the new carbon core thing) and a Protrek PRW3100Y-1b (which is arriving Thursday this week). Other than the Protrek which isn't hear yet, I can say, without a doubt, none of the Gs did it for me. Nothing wrong with them, but for what I want, and with my prior experience, I didn't think any of them were good enough.

Back in my "runnin' and gunnin'" days I wore a G-Shock DW6600, which I bought at the base exchange for cheap and it was a great watch. I have no problems with Casio, just some of their designs, while really neat, are completely overdone and unnecessary. That was my main issue recently and what has led me to the Nixon Regulus.

OK so to the Regulus. I watched the video, slept on the thought of "could I be caught dead wearing one?", especially around my friend who wears Omega and Seiko daily... I decided to let my experience and wishes for a specific watch do the purchasing rather than stereotypes and biases. I now live with my wife and child on Vancouver Island, BC (yep I'm a Canuck now), and the common outdoor activites here are surfing, camping, off-roading and extreme sports to name a few. So I called around to the local outdoor places and luckily found a well known local surf shop that had one left in stock. I rushed out to go check it out. The clerk said she couldn't keep them in stock. That was the first positive (as long as she wasn't lying). If local surfers are buying them, then they are at least durable and fashionable enough to attract that crowd. It doesn't mean they are better than a similar brand or look, but it's at least a seal of approval from people who live in the ocean (you can surf year round here).

I asked about warranty issues, since they are an AD. She said, in the time they have stocked them there hasn't been one return for service or replacement due to a build quality issue or someone destroying it and needing to buy a new one. OK someone could have hated it or broke it and not gone back, but either way, it's a good sign.

So I tried it on and I was pretty happy with the look. I have large hands and skinny, boney wrists, so finding a heavy duty digital, or any watch over 42mm that I can wear confidently, is not so easy. My Tuna-light is big but due to the non-existent lugs, it wears small. So this Regulus kinda fits like that watch, even though it's square. I think having the free swinging strap also helps. My main issue with most, but not all Gs is the case to strap design, which just makes the watch wear larger than it needs to.

From watching the product videos (there are 2) I pretty much knew how to operate everything on the watch. With Casio, I've used Gs long enough to know how to pick one up and use it, but I do remember the first few times having to read the manual or watch some videos. The Regulus is literally a pick up and use watch with very little learning. OK so that's another positive.

Features, well.... It's not for everyone. If your idea of a EDC/Field/Apocalypse watch has ABC functions, solar charging, atomic timekeeping and every time zone in the world, then you're NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS WATCH. Let that sink in before you hastily reply to this review in anger. I know this watch may not appeal to you. I don't care, it's fine. This thread is more of an informational from an average dude who's been fortunate enough to have a background to properly review military-type gear. You might know more than me, and that's fine too. If you're a member of DEVGRU and think this review is BS, then fine. If you're a couch commander who likes to count watch features and use that as a measure of real life experience, then that's fine too. This review is for open minded folks, who are looking for an alternative to other brands.

OK, Stop watches.... 2 of them, that can be started, stopped and reset, independently, using 1 button each.... And the stop watches show activity on the other screens..... That is killer! When I was in the military we would use timing devices for all sorts of things. Call and repeat for ranging, how long an event has taken place, time on target, etc and so forth. Now I use it for how long my burgers have been cooking on the grill and other nonsense. Do I need 2 of them? Eh, I dunno, but they are easier to use than other digital brands (other than the Rangeman dedicated button).

The countdown timer.... Again, nothing special here. It's only good for an hour, but hey, it's much more realistic for day to day use for me. Laundry, cooking, how long my boy has been at the park etc.

Alarms, you get 3. Again, nothing special, and definitely less than 5. And unlike my last G I can't set the alarms for specific days and months. But last time I checked, a random alarm I set 3 weeks ago, isn't doing me any favours. Be realistic here guys. That thing beeps and you're like.... Uh what the [email protected] was that for?

OK OK OK, I basically told you that this watch isn't anything special. So you can feel free to laugh at how dumb it is and cry that you read up to this point and won't ever get that time back.....


OK the good and the better.

This watch is built more solid "feeling" than any G-Shock or similar watch I've ever worn. It's not overly large, but somewhere between the 5600 and the King. It fits well on my tiny, girl wrists without making me look like a 44 year old dude pretending to be hip.

The display..... OH the display. It's a negative display (they do have 1 positive display model). This watch is the easiest-to-read digital I have used in recent memory, and that's compared to positive displays. The contrast is very high and the digits are almost HD looking. You can read this watch, without the backlight, even in darkened rooms. Basically unless it's pitch black, you'll be able to read this negative display. Otherwise you have the backlight. Also, I wear glasses now for reading and computer use. I can easily read this watch, even in low light, without my glasses or having to activate the light. Again, if there is a little light in the room, you'll see it just fine. For pitch black you have the back light.

The backlight, you can set it to 1, 2 or 3 seconds and to a "off", low, medium or high intensity. It's a blueish kinda light under the screen, kinda like you see on the Gs. I find the lowest level is about the same level as a G Shock. The medium and high are too bright for me, and would otherwise drain the battery more than I need. As far as the time the light stays on, it's 1, 2 or 3 seconds. Also changing these settings is simple and fast. No deep diving to find the settings.

Silent mode... Wanna tell the watch to STFU because you're about to sneak up on Bin Laden? Or more realistically sneak around your sleeping kid to get some work done while they nap. Simple to turn on and off right on the front of the watch.

The strap, is very comfortable and is free swinging so I think it will appeal a lot of people, rather than the Casio style on a lot of Gs which can be hit or miss. I have found some Gs very comfortable and others to bruise my wrist bones. So YRMV, but this watch has proven easy to wear. Also there are water evacuation ridges on the bottom side to help air flow after being submerged, so you don't get that wet wrist skin sh1t happening. Otherwise it's a love it or hate it thing, but I find it very serviceable, so a long term report will have to follow to talk about durability etc.

The case itself.... Like I said, it's a square, you already know what's up if you know this kinda style. It's familiar if you are into 5600s. what I will say is it feels substantial even though it's light weigh. It just has a quality feel. The buttons (pushers) feel quality and their action has really good spring and you know when you're pushing them. Also, using them with gloved hands will be simple. It's just got a 4-screw stainless case back to access the movement/battery. Nothing special going on here....

OK so the other things I want to quickly (yeah right) touch on as my initial thoughts and the selling points and why I think this MAY appeal to you.

In the 12 years I served I trained a lot. I've been to desert warfare school (ExPERT/Silver Flag Alpha as well as the course at Ft Lewis), Korean peninsula defence school (Commando Warrior and FOAL Eagle for you guys who know)and have knowledge of land navigation, basic survival, and all sorts of things have have ZERO application in my life at the moment. But what I can say is, we had specific tools for specific jobs. If you had a tool that did all jobs and that tool broke, then you're a$$ out and struggling to maintain mission goals. I never used an ABC watch to get from port of Kuwait to Baghdad. In fact those ABC watches that people covet aren't properly calibrated or certified for actual mission use anyway, so pointless in real military needs. The manual even states these devices aren't to be used for mission critical jobs. All of the gear we used was much higher end and much more accurate than the little sensors on these watches. That doesn't mean a compass, barometer or altimeter (or depth sensor for you divers) isn't useful for civilians. Be realistic though, about what you actually think your ABC watch is capable of. But when it comes to the design SPECIFICALLY of the Regulus, why bother putting them in there if they are useless in the field? OK so get rid of that nonsense. Solar charging.... OK so this is a ding against the Regulus, so we'll see how the 5 year battery holds up.... Will I still even be wearing this in 5 years?.... 3 years?.... Next year? Maybe. So that one is up to opinion, but if I still have this, then a visit to my watch guy, a battery and a pressure test for $30 and a few minutes of my time, IS NOT A BIG DEAL. Atomic timekeeping.... Again, I have an atomic watch (citizen pilot) and the Pathfinder that is on the way which I'll likely return (maybe, if the wife yells), but it's not a deal breaker. I don't see the Rolex crowd complaining their Subs don't have atomic time.... OK so get over that.

100m water resistance.... The comments online are hilarious. "No SEAL would wear a watch that's 100m resistant".... OK first off, I was issued a Marathon field watch when I deployed in 2003. It was 50m water resistant and made of poly with an acrylic crystal. It felt like a toy, but it worked perfectly for my whole deployment. No I'm not a diver, but by some of the comments I read, many of you aren't either. And you do not know that combat diving and saturation diving are not the same thing. You do NOT need 200m water resistance for most combat type water operations. The 100m of the Regulus is perfectly serviceable. If you need more, you're relying on other gear anyway, not a watch. But these guys are on rebreathers and navigating waterways at shallower depths. They may use the timing functions but that's about it. Otherwise this watch is fine for most all but deep sea divers. I would not wear this to weld under an oil rig at the floor of the ocean. But I wouldn't use any wrist watch in that scenario anyway. Not unless it was issued to me. Also I haven't welded anything since High School shop class so I'll leave that alone. I do however take it swimming. The YMCA even has a rapid river kinda thing there for fun, as well as a heated therapy pool, hot tub and olympic size pool. I have gone through all these pools one after the other. Varying depths and temperatures as well as the rapid pool with water guns that shoot at you (it's really fun). This watch performs perfectly.

OK conclusion... Yeah I got there finally. You still with me? Ready to flame this review with whatever? OK...

This watch has exactly what the product video says. Some ex SEAL used his name and connections with the "Teams" to develop a G-Shock competitor for Nixon with his old buddies. He knew he couldn't compete with the crazy features that many G-Shock watches have. So what did he do? He gave us something we didn't know we wanted. A simple as hell, tough as boulders, extremely easy to read minimalist digital field watch. They gave it a bit of a "tacticool" look and fancy colours to appeal to the Paul Blarts of the world, and BAM Regulus was created. From my knowledge and experience and wishes in a watch, it's a home run. No it's not as fancy as a Rangeman or a Mudmaster, it's also FAR less annoying to look at, much easier to read and upon initial conclusions will be every bit as durable.

Can you stomach wearing a Nixon around your friends? It's like this watch is that cool girl you wanted to ask out but were afraid you'd be judged over since she wasn't the most popular. Eventually you grew up (I hope) and found real substance in a good woman. This watch might be that good woman. No she can't tell you the elevation of your office chair, and won't alarm you to sudden drops in barometric pressure of the mens room while you pass that burrito... But you can take her anywhere and she'll do what she does, and do it well... Back to that issued Marathon.... It was a 3 hand with date window and 50m water resistance.... It was given to me by the supply chain before going into harm's way. This watch does FAR more than that and is probably much more durable... Think about that before you comment about how you can't live without A, B or C. lol

Final question to ponder. Does this watch over-hype and under-deliver? Or does a Casio, Garmin or Suunto over-hype and deliver false confidence? Think about the feature set and how useful they actually are. At the end of the day they all tell you what time it is. At least the marketing behind the Regulus is to give you a barebones tough digital field watch without the gadget factor.
I’ve had a Regulus for about 4 years and I love it. Battery is still going strong and never had an issue.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
All Black / Red and Tiger Camo colours are currently on sale in UK, £112, if anyone is tempted


 

· Registered
Samsung Galaxy Watch4, G-Shock GAS100, Fossil Branson Hybrid, Suunto Core All Black
Joined
·
18 Posts
Thanks, this is an important info.

Do you know if the module is the same?
I would assume it is the same as the MK-1, but I can't tell for sure.

All Black / Red and Tiger Camo colours are currently on sale in UK, £112, if anyone is tempted


I have the Black/Red en route today. Got it for $122USD
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,387 Posts
Thanks, this is an important info.

Do you know if the module is the same?
Are you familiar with these articles?
Meet the Nixon MK-1, a Tactical Watch Only Uniformed Pros Can Buy (govx.com)
NIXON Releases the MK-1 Watch - Soldier Systems Daily

Someone in the comments also mentions:
"Well I just received my MK-1, very clearly marked on both packaging and watch back “Made in Hong Kong”.
Yes, Hong Kong is listed as a TAA “country” by GSA, but to me it is just another made in China watch."

Also notice this little discussion:
Font Screenshot Parallel Rectangle Number

I guess countdown timer and second timezone were not on the list? As to why? As far as I know military uses zulu time anyway. And they start an operation at certain times, not by setting a countdown?

Anyway, assuming they are identical and that for some reasons the specs. for US Govt. force Nixon to decrease the amount of features, any idea why a “issued” watch (if we can use this wording) should not have a 2nd timezone or a countdown timer if those was solid part of the “civilian” version that was (as Nixon say) “developed in coop with special forces members”?
I have a few Citizen sports watches with the DN95 module. It has a chronograph, 2nd timezone, countdown timer and dual alarms. Maybe the Regulus just got typical sports watch features rather than features requested by "special forces". And apparently they said: ditch the 2nd timezone and countdown timer, and give us dual chronos.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,457 Posts
Dear Citizen Promaster, sorry for the late reply I was on a business trip.

I had read all the MK-1 articles I had found before buying it, so I was surprised when I saw mine was "Made in China", so, in my opinion, the only reason is that the commercial version is different from the early "issued" version.

But I still suspect they miss some important function in the "issued" version too.

In my opinion, the reason for cutting off the countdown and 2nd timezone is not reasonable: I think they are key features for a watch like that and essential to "military" or "law enforcement" purposes.

Concerning "tactical watches" yes, right now everything could be called like that: every day on Instagram I saw pictures of operators wearing everything, from F91 to Rolex Submariner and all that in between, so talking about a specific "military" watch in my honest opinion does not make any sense today and in the future, but is something I say from more than 20 years now.

Different is when brands (of every price, and market position) try to connect their watches to some military corp: recently Christoper Wards do something like that, but we can name tenth... and this si the case of Nixon.

By the way, at least, some right and consistent "product placement" with the REGULUS civil version (that at the beginning was the only one made in "coop" with Navy Seals is now available: look at the last episode of the new ECHO 3 Series on Apple TV+ the main character a Navy Seal is wearing the same model of mine: SURPLUS + CARBON and positive dial ;)

Nice!
Watch Sleeve Gesture Finger Thumb
Hand Organism Gesture Finger Musical instrument


Let's see in this discussion if someone owns

the "original issued" one and could confirm the module function.

Thanks!
 
81 - 100 of 118 Posts
Top