WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

1 - 14 of 14 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
75 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Now why exactly must you guys at G-Shock design make the men's watches so large in size- precisely why? If it's fashion, it's not; it's silliness- not trendiness. You've proven that, say, with an AWGM100-1ACR
normal-sized designs are capable of being implemented and executed (despite some drawbacks with that unit), and now with the women's line G-MS--say with the MSG-S200-7A--



you've taken an exceptional G-Steel design and applied it only to one segment, whereas the men's GSTS310-1A




looks clownish in size (and that is the slightly smaller version) yet, to me, it is the best G-Shock made thus far. Why not try to tone down the sizing of the GSTS-310, bring it down a notch... or five? It's your best design- at least to me; it's a tough solar watch with good looks but it shouldn't look like this...




It should be thinner, smaller in diameter, yet holding this design. Take the design of the GSTS310-1A and tone down its sizing between the MSG-S200-7A and AWGM100-1ACR (a bit thinner, though). Super-illuminate it light blue/red/or amber, if you can add atomic sync in a slimmer case- do it, add a sapphire crystal if you're in the mood, tag it at $400, and you finally have it.

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,381 Posts
It should be and it was. There is no technical need to produce 60mm sized case to house all this tech (solar, MB6).
I have GW1700 which is titanium full metal and very unobtrusive.
It seem to be trend in Casio minds to produce over sized watches from simple quartz (tiny Miyota based) to digitals and Gs.
As far as it sells there will be no change.
GW1700 is still on sale in Japan so some models will be around.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,143 Posts


It should be thinner, smaller in diameter, yet holding this design. Take the design of the GSTS310-1A and tone down its sizing between the MSG-S200-7A and AWGM100-1ACR (a bit thinner, though). Super-illuminate it light blue/red/or amber, if you can add atomic sync in a slimmer case- do it, add a sapphire crystal if you're in the mood, tag it at $400, and you finally have it.

Cheers
looks fine to me. dont like big watches, buy the gms, hunt for smaller older models or stick with dainty dress watches. casio makes plenty of smaller watches but gshocks are mostly bold and unapologetic, dont go to a burger and rib joint complaining about no vegan options ;)
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
20,733 Posts
For what it's worth, the GST-W310-1AER (European version) does include Multiband 6 automic timekeeping.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,461 Posts
I guess Casio did its homework, big watches are "in" for a certain crowd. Invicta seem to be doing good with their hockey pucks as well. Lets vote with our wallet and buy what we like. Casio may get the message or don't, there's not mch we can do anyhow :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocket1991

·
Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
G-shock consists of various big / oversize design watches, and it still looks good on your wrist.

I also wear GST 310, and my wrist is 16cm.

Any g-shock with lug-to-lug length of 48mm is good for me.

Just wear it if you like it. IMO
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
75 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Hey, if certain people like large (to massive) watches, more power to them; I was simply letting Casio know that they could easily include a model for those that prefer a "normal" sized G-Shock. And since they have those models in their line-up, they could accommodate a watch less than 45mm. Don't have to make a 35mm watch- that may look a bit dainty but whatever: to each their own and I get that. In point, if they had the GSTS310-1A in 40- 43mm that didn't look like a hockey puck, I would buy it in a heartbeat.

Thanks to everyone above that replied. Cheers.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,381 Posts
I tried GST310 (North American sans MB6) and without bracelet it is wearable. With t-shirt.
Nothing with cuffs will get over it within my wardrobe. It obviously personal choice to wear something you like and many people do find these big watches attractive.
As been told many times G-Shocks are unique in terms of how huge watch can be totally ok on your wrist.
Big brother of 310 was hanging over my wrist and with amount of stainless steel it become way too much.GST 310 i tried 3 times and passed on it.
I can't pay full price for a watch which is ok in terms of comfort or in some cases below ok. It like buying uncomfortable shoes. What the point?
One of the problem i don't have with resin/polymer/plastic Gs is weight is small and thus watch don't come banging on my palm while i do something.
With G-Steel it not the case.
Here AQ-S800 vs AQ-S810
aq-s810.jpg
DSC03277.jpg
Same watch 2 sizes. It's not about internals it about looks and making more "substantial" watch. Both 100m WR so bulk does not have engineering reasons.
Both are comfortable by the way. Also it very good to have options.
Even Casio veteran AMW320 was tiny module inside huge case. So nothing is particularly new.
There are Casio Lineage models with thin case and module very similar to certain G-Shocks.
Modules themselves usually are much smaller than you can think it really would be great if Casio pull watches without Baby G for these who want smaller watch.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
567 Posts
This series at 100m water resistance and its brother at 200m w.r. are nice watches actually--not G's but still comfortable and lightweight to wear and easy to set. Wish the G100 was this easy.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,381 Posts
This series at 100m water resistance and its brother at 200m w.r. are nice watches actually--not G's but still comfortable and lightweight to wear and easy to set. Wish the G100 was this easy.
G100 has great visible digits, but less functions, analog part is independent (thus pain to change time) and no solar but overall nice watch.

Nothing perfect
 

Attachments

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
20,733 Posts
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
Top