WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
238 Posts
I’m no expert but I am suspicious. Seems just too clean to be real. Also, I see three different fonts used for the number 4. Looking at pictures on google images, I can’t find another UG Compur that does that. But, like I sai, I’m not an expert.
 

·
Moderator Public Forum
Joined
·
22,053 Posts
Moved from Public to Vintage and Pocket Watch.
I'm no expert either but when I see a perfect dial on a 70 year old watch I'm suspicious.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,777 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
808 Posts
I`m no U.G.expert but I`d go with a redial too..
sub dial markings look to small for the dial indents and if you look at the bases of particularly the large 2 and the zero on the large 10 they look very scrappy to me.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,166 Posts
Thanks for the replies. It looked too good but I don’t have any experience with radials. How are the best ones done?
There are several sites and threads on WUS on how redialing works. Essentially it is a 'printing' process from pre-made dial templates. It can be nicely done or it can be a disaster -- depends on the skill of the craftsperson. You are right, it looks too good for it's age. Insufficient wabi-sabi :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
363 Posts
Subdials are misaligned. Look at the spacing between the chapter rings and the edge of the subdial recesses. Both are shifted towards 3 o'clock and away from 9. Add that to the fact that the dial is waaaay to clean for the age of the watch and I think the answer is clear.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top