I’m no expert but I am suspicious. Seems just too clean to be real. Also, I see three different fonts used for the number 4. Looking at pictures on google images, I can’t find another UG Compur that does that. But, like I sai, I’m not an expert.
I`m no U.G.expert but I`d go with a redial too..
sub dial markings look to small for the dial indents and if you look at the bases of particularly the large 2 and the zero on the large 10 they look very scrappy to me.
There are several sites and threads on WUS on how redialing works. Essentially it is a 'printing' process from pre-made dial templates. It can be nicely done or it can be a disaster -- depends on the skill of the craftsperson. You are right, it looks too good for it's age. Insufficient wabi-sabi
Subdials are misaligned. Look at the spacing between the chapter rings and the edge of the subdial recesses. Both are shifted towards 3 o'clock and away from 9. Add that to the fact that the dial is waaaay to clean for the age of the watch and I think the answer is clear.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
WatchUSeek Watch Forums
22.5M posts
576.4K members
Since 2005
A forum community dedicated to watch owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about watch collections, displays, watch winders, accessories, classifieds, and more! We welcome all manufacturers including Casio G-Shock, OMEGA, Rolex, Breitling, Rolex and Tudor, Seiko, Grand Seiko and others.