Joined
·
397 Posts
I recently received a SKX009K by accident (which was supposed to be SKX175).( https://www.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?do=editpost&postid=242354 ). Question is, does it really matter? For all intents and purposes, and from what I read on the Seiko Diver's Reference over on SCWF, they are the same.
Should I return and get a 175 which is what I ordered (because there was a great deal going for the 175, not for the 009K). I'd have to deal with possibly paying the return shipping, and also the hassle, and even possible risk of getting another 009K. The watch (for some strange reason) did not include the string tag when I bought it on Amazon last week.
The question is having Singapore or Malaysia on dial or not. Obviously having 'Japan' would be most desirable, but that's not what we're talking about here. Would having nothing instead of Singapore or Malaysia be preferrable? Or would it be better to actually know where it's from (which is in itself debatable, again... from info on the Seiko Diver's reference (http://www.makedostudio.com/watches/seiko-divers/index.html#7S26).
thnx |>
Should I return and get a 175 which is what I ordered (because there was a great deal going for the 175, not for the 009K). I'd have to deal with possibly paying the return shipping, and also the hassle, and even possible risk of getting another 009K. The watch (for some strange reason) did not include the string tag when I bought it on Amazon last week.
The question is having Singapore or Malaysia on dial or not. Obviously having 'Japan' would be most desirable, but that's not what we're talking about here. Would having nothing instead of Singapore or Malaysia be preferrable? Or would it be better to actually know where it's from (which is in itself debatable, again... from info on the Seiko Diver's reference (http://www.makedostudio.com/watches/seiko-divers/index.html#7S26).
thnx |>