WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Smaller Watches on Bigger Wrists

4.4K views 34 replies 26 participants last post by  MDNoobie  
#1 ·
A friend of mine asked me to find him a watch for his smaller wrist (6.5"). I realized that would mean 40mm max at the larger end down to 36mm. I recommended a Hamilton Field watch right off the bat but it's outside his budget. I've since pointed him towards a Seiko 5 SNK809 which has a similar esthetic but more to his budget level.

Still, I went through a lot of different watches and came across the Geckota E01 which I quite like the look of but at 36.5mm feel it might look weird on my wrist as almost all of the online pics are on people of a more normal size.

So could you guys post up shots of watches under 38mm on your +7" wrist so I can judge for myself?
 
#2 ·


Here is my Todd Snyder Timex at 36mm on my 6 3/4" wrist. They come in green, dark blue, silver, and black, and they are hand winding mechanical. Not sure if all of those colors are still available. They run around $200. Hope that's not over budget. Check them out on the Todd Snyder web site.
Joe
 
#4 ·
I have a 7 1/2” wrist and also own a 34mil Timex.

It looks too small on me but I still love it’s design.

Too small is better than too big IMO, as I see some WRUW posts with 47mil Panerais on 6” wrists and they look worse.
 
#5 ·
I have a 7 1/2" wrist and also own a 34mil Timex.

It looks too small on me but I still love it's design.

Too small is better than too big IMO, as I see some WRUW posts with 47mil Panerais on 6" wrists and they look worse.
Yeah, fair enough. I'm not a fan of the huge and chunky look either. Though my Bulova Moonwatch looks pretty good on wrist and doesn't come across as too large. There's a local seller here with a Geckota E01 at a fair price and I think I might pick it up to just see for myself.
 
#8 · (Edited)
I have posted a 33mm Hamilton H3 on a just over 7" wrist.
It looks fine mainly due to large-ish lugs.

Another thing to consider is the wrist profile. If your wrist has a flat surface while pronated then even larger watches will sit well on the wrist and look fine. If you have a cylindrical, tubular wrist then even if it's of a bigger circumference, the watches will look too big and out of place. So, it's not just the case width, but the shape of ones wrist and the profile of the lugs also play a part in how the watch looks and feels on a wrist.
Image


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 
#30 ·
To me it totally depends on what you want the watch for.

I prefer my daily wearers to be bigger but my dress watches to be smaller, often by a significant amount.
Yep agree with that.

Particularly if one wears a shirt and jacket/suit.

I have a 7.5" wrist and wore a 36mm Omega Seamaster (which happened to be a family heirloom) and it looked fine and was also very easy to wear as it did not catch on the cuff at all.

So +1 from me.
 
#25 ·
Why would you pass up a watch you like because of some stereotype about how big they should be?
I’ve begun collecting vintage watches and have no problem with their size. Today, most watches look the same to me and the market is glider with clones. Get what you like.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
#26 ·
Why would you pass up a watch you like because of some stereotype about how big they should be?
I've begun collecting vintage watches and have no problem with their size. Today, most watches look the same to me and the market is glider with clones. Get what you like.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Just trying to remove the arguments in my head and right now, I'm pretty much stuck at home like most of us, so the ability to head down to an AD and see for myself is not there. I'm a pretty visual person so being able to see comparative sizing on other peoples wrists really helps. Of course I realize it's all relative to lug to lug width etc. and how it sits on your wrist.
 
#27 ·
My wrist is 7.25 inches

38mm case



37mm case



36mm



I am currently considering a 35mm Casio Edifice - :think:

I think a lot about how a watch looks is about the size of the dial rather than the case - most of mine have a dial size of around 30mm which seems to suit me from my smallest to my largest 44.5mmm case

 
#31 ·
OT:
I cannot provide a pic of a 38mm watch on my 7" wrist b/c I dont own such a watch. I do own 37mm and 39mm watches. Inasmuch as neither is what you requested, I have provide links to pic of them rather than reposting the photos here.

Observations:
FWIW, in trying on more watches than I care to count, I donned pieces ranging from 33mm to 50-something millimeters. At the smaller end (33-38mm), besides the two watches noted above, were several PP, AP, & VC dress watches, Omega Constellation, Tag diver, Piaget dress watch, and Lord knows what else among the oodles of recent and vintage pieces I tried on.

From all that "test driving," I came to several conclusions about watch size:
  • For dress watches, <40mm look best, most refined and subtle, partially peeking out from under a shirt cuff.
  • Just about any diameter looks at least okay if the watch case and/or lugs in some way conforms to the curve of one's wrist. If the watch wears flat across one's wrist, smaller lessens the watch "impersonating" a saucer strapped/balancing atop one's wrist.
  • Apparent height, rather than diameter, contributes more (IMO) to how well a watch looks on one's wrist. The lower it appears to sit, the better it looks The caseback design, along with the overall height, most affects this aspect of how a watch wears and looks; moreover, few photos present this aspect well.
  • Complicated watches', particularly multi-subdial chronographs, usability/readability benefits from larger diameters. Single-dial yet multiply scaled chronographs like the PP 5975 also are easier to read when there's more "real estate."
 
#32 ·
OT:
I cannot provide a pic of a 38mm watch on my 7" wrist b/c I dont own such a watch. I do own 37mm and 39mm watches. Inasmuch as neither is what you requested, I have provide links to pic of them rather than reposting the photos here.

Observations:
FWIW, in trying on more watches than I care to count, I donned pieces ranging from 33mm to 50-something millimeters. At the smaller end (33-38mm), besides the two watches noted above, were several PP, AP, & VC dress watches, Omega Constellation, Tag diver, Piaget dress watch, and Lord knows what else among the oodles of recent and vintage pieces I tried on.

From all that "test driving," I came to several conclusions about watch size:
  • For dress watches, <40mm look best, most refined and subtle, partially peeking out from under a shirt cuff.
  • Just about any diameter looks at least okay if the watch case and/or lugs in some way conforms to the curve of one's wrist. If the watch wears flat across one's wrist, smaller lessens the watch "impersonating" a saucer strapped/balancing atop one's wrist.
    [*]Apparent height, rather than diameter, contributes more (IMO) to how well a watch looks on one's wrist. The lower it appears to sit, the better it looks The caseback design, along with the overall height, most affects this aspect of how a watch wears and looks; moreover, few photos present this aspect well.
  • Complicated watches', particularly multi-subdial chronographs, usability/readability benefits from larger diameters. Single-dial yet multiply scaled chronographs like the PP 5975 also are easier to read when there's more "real estate."
Excellent points all around, but I think these are the most often overlooked aspects of watch fit. Most people here get obsessed with diameter, but I've found that how the watch hugs the wrist and how low it sits play the largest role in whether or not it "looks right" for lack of a better term.

One example is the SKX013. It's supposedly small for a diver at 38mm, but it's incredibly blocky/chunky and has awkward-shaped lugs and a bulging caseback that makes the actual case of the watch sit incredibly far off the wrist. I've tried one on before, and despite the 38mm diameter, I found its "perceived size" was a lot bigger than even some 40mm watches I've tried on due to the blocky, awkward fit.