Joined
·
9,795 Posts
I am with @Mleok.
The article pointed to a few technical differences and then make a whole lot of unsubstantiated claims. They had a lot of 1-11s fail the QC procedure and he goes from there to conclude that claims about the 1-11's unreliability are inaccurate? Does not compute.
The article pointed to a few technical differences and then make a whole lot of unsubstantiated claims. They had a lot of 1-11s fail the QC procedure and he goes from there to conclude that claims about the 1-11's unreliability are inaccurate? Does not compute.
