WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Take the risk? Or watch from a distance?

13K views 47 replies 36 participants last post by  The original Dryfly guy  
#1 ·
Getting real close to purchasing my first "good" watch. Currently rocking a Spinnaker that has been good to me but was just a trial to see if I enjoy wearing watches. I have flipped and flopped so many times about what I want but a few requirements are:
1. Bracelet only.
2. COSC certified. No more re-setting the time every week.
3. Somewhat unique.
4. Look good in office clothes but not out of place in a t-shirt.
5. Solid lume.
6. Not too big for 6.75" wrist. Current watch is 42mm (50L2L) and I sometimes think it's too big .
Image

I have been thinking about the Serica 5303 for a long time. Too many issues with the movement but they are releasing an updated version in December. What does everyone think? Pre-order for December or wait for others to try and reveal any potential issues first?
The watch certainly fits my criteria and is just quirky enough to keepy attention.
 
#7 ·
What issues are there with the M100? I know nothing about movements just trying to get a good quality watch that speaks to me. If the issues aren't major, it might be something I could live with. For example, there are numerous Serica owners that have intermittent issues with the seconds hand continuing after the crown is pulled out. While that may be quirky, it doesn't seem like something that would effect being able to set the time to within a minute or less.
 
#10 ·
The M100 was formerly known as the A10 (Soprod rebranded a couple of years ago and changed their movement names). When the A10 came out, it was hailed as a more affordable ETA 2892 or Sellita SW300 alternative (same form factor, but not a clone of the ETA like Sellita). It's supposedly based on the Seiko 4L.

Several manufacturers jumped onto the A10, including Sinn and Steinhart, as a replacement for 2892s or SW300s they had been using. Within 3 years, all of them switched back to ETA or Sellita. Owners of watches with A10s that had issues and sent their watches in for repair sometimes got them back with ETA or Sellita swapped in. I don't know what specifically the problems were, but timekeeping issues were reported by owners. Defect rate was reportedly high and I guess parts and support from Soprod wasn't adequate.

This was 7-8 years ago, so maybe Soprod has sorted it out, but I suspect there's a reason why they have been rarely used.
 
#12 ·
I really like Serica. The 4512 Commando is the model I'm interested in. The movement thing and the pre-order are an issue.

Still on my list but will have to wait until it is updated and in stock ready to ship.
 
#14 ·
Love Formex Reef but looks to wear a little big for me. Also like Essence but the more I look the less I like the exposed screw heads. The only other consideration I had was a Maurice Lacroix Aikon (used) but ultimately decided it was too flashy for me.
 
#15 ·
Budget? If you will spend more then I recommend something with proven performance, such as an Omega with Caliber 8900. An Aqua Terra sounds like it fits the bill, assuming you're okay with a watch in the $5-ish range.
 
#18 ·
Love my Serica, but it is the only watch I've ever had to send in under warranty within the first week.
No clue if Soprod has fixed its issues recently, but I wouldn't rush to buy another.
 
#23 ·
I have a 5303 from the very first batch, had the fix done, it works fine. Been wearing it all summer, day in day out.
Once I figured out the gain or lose a couple seconds in what position it's just going on, I'm a few seconds off after almost 2 months.
Given the newer release will be COSC and a more tested movement, I wouldn't be overly concerned.
I think it's a cool watch, with plenty of personality.
Worth it IMO.
Obviously YMMV
Cheers
 
#25 ·
In this price range, Christopher Ward is tough to beat. They have a number of chronometer grade options available as well.

Perhaps also consider the Rado Captain Cook line. They have a similar look to the Serica you're interested in. The Lorier Neptune is also similar, though with a acrylic crystal rather than sapphire.

Of these 3, I only have experience with CW, and would highly recommend them if they have a watch that catches your eye.

I wouldn't personally spend any time or money on a potentially problematic movement. Too much of a PITA, especially when there are so many watches out there that likely won't have issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oakenfield
#26 ·
It's too bad because design wise I feel there's nothing like it. But yeah, considering the movement issues, I'd wait to see the feedback with the new movement. But that coud mean waiting a year, or that's what I'd do.

If you have another watch you like, maybe I'd go for that one instead.
 
#27 ·
I echo what O said above. Considering it’s your first ”good” watch, I would recommend going with something tried and tested. Chris Ward is excellent value for money. Some great Nomos in that range as well. And the Rado Captain Cook 37mm is a great watch as well. Also, check out Oris. Impossible to go wrong with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeisterEder
#28 ·
COSC certification is great, but not absolutely necessary if you care about accuracy. There are plenty of well-regarded movements that run +5/-5 generally that aren’t certified, especially if you are willing to get them regulated after you’ve worn them and determined their specific tendencies.