2023 Watch Purchasing Abstinence Report - Day 5
I haven't bought a watch yet (but I'm thinking about it).
I haven't bought a watch yet (but I'm thinking about it).
🤨I looked at the San Martins. Too small a diameter to too thick. I know I'd hate them.
I'll probably just keep looking at the Steinhart until it's gone. It is a bit underwhelming.
That Scurfa Blue Treasure Seeker, though! Magnificent!
360 to go…2023 Watch Purchasing Abstinence Report - Day 5
I haven't bought a watch yet (but I'm thinking about it).
At least let us bash it before placing the order.... Strike 1/3 for Gulag sentence....I nearly did, but cancelled the order.
Share your thoughts with us!I haven't bought a watch yet (but I'm thinking about it).
I always seem to associate the Scurfa name with "schurft" (Dutch for scabies). Let me insert that association into your mind right there. 👌That Scurfa Blue Treasure Seeker, though! Magnificent!
Feeling the hard love here....... 👍👍👍At least let us bash it before placing the order.... Strike 1/3 for Gulag sentence....
Odds are that I’ll be the first inmate so if you get sent there too Pete you can help me build the place.At least let us bash it before placing the order.... Strike 1/3 for Gulag sentence....
Sure, I see what you guys are doing. Setting up your own "Hard Love" tribe to exclude the rest of us...Feeling the hard love here....... 👍👍👍
No one is exempt from hard love.......Sure, I see what you guys are doing. Setting up your own "Hard Love" tribe to exclude the rest of us...
Um, on second thought,
You all be you. We're happy for you, and just want to be open minded and supportive!
from a safe distance...![]()
After household needs are met, including all that boring, mundane stuff like savings, retirement, etc., modest expenditures are usually OK.I'd be interested to hear how you approach (relative to your own financial means) your personal limits on what is acceptable / prudent to spend on a watch?
I would disagree with the futility of buying the cheaper watch. I have purchased cheaper versions of designs I admire, and in at least one case, came away with a cheaper watch that probably wears better and meets more of my criteria than the watch it might be accused of homaging.Advice is often given (and I think I agree) that if your heart is set on watch A, then buying cheaper watch B (which is a bit similar but not as nice), in an attempt to scratch the itch, is a futile pursuit.
But if watch A is a Vacheron Constantin 222, then a lot of people (myself included) will need to accept that it won't ever happen and might choose to look for a watch that shares some characteristics but at a much lower price-point.
I was thinking one approach is to choose watches that are in your budget but have a design integrity or enough unique attributes that they don't feel like lesser versions of something else. G-shocks are good for this as they could be argued to be the best or most desirable of their genre. But steel sports watches? Pilot's watches? I think it's harder.
Exactly. Everyone gets a bit of your hard love.....No one is exempt from hard love.......
Very good question. I for one was very happy playing in the affordables end of the pool, when I started moving up the towards the luxury end (first Oris and then Tudor) it spoiled me for the affordables I think, since then there's very little that appeals in affordable ranges. Either designs are off or the quality is below what I'd want. If you've not been spoiled (or aren't like me) as it were then I'm sure you can find watches that can satisfy, it's just a matter of hunting.I think this is still in the spirit of WPAC as it concerns budget control and avoiding flipping...
I'd be interested to hear how you approach (relative to your own financial means) your personal limits on what is acceptable / prudent to spend on a watch?
Advice is often given (and I think I agree) that if your heart is set on watch A, then buying cheaper watch B (which is a bit similar but not as nice), in an attempt to scratch the itch, is a futile pursuit.
But if watch A is a Vacheron Constantin 222, then a lot of people (myself included) will need to accept that it won't ever happen and might choose to look for a watch that shares some characteristics but at a much lower price-point.
I was thinking one approach is to choose watches that are in your budget but have a design integrity or enough unique attributes that they don't feel like lesser versions of something else. G-shocks are good for this as they could be argued to be the best or most desirable of their genre. But steel sports watches? Pilot's watches? I think it's harder.
sharing is caring! 😘Exactly. Everyone gets a bit of your hard love.....
I am in the same mid-range boat and it is heading down river to Luxurytown. Last night, I caught myself looking at vintage Vacheron Constantin but I was able to squash that by buying a $10 LEGO set.Very good question. I for one was very happy playing in the affordables end of the pool, when I started moving up the towards the luxury end (first Oris and then Tudor) it spoiled me for the affordables I think, since then there's very little that appeals in affordable ranges. Either designs are off or the quality is below what I'd want. If you've not been spoiled (or aren't like me) as it were then I'm sure you can find watches that can satisfy, it's just a matter of hunting.
This is something that is very dependent on your personal situation I guess. What is acceptable to spend on watches depnds on a lot of factors:I think this is still in the spirit of WPAC as it concerns budget control and avoiding flipping...
I'd be interested to hear how you approach (relative to your own financial means) your personal limits on what is acceptable / prudent to spend on a watch?
Advice is often given (and I think I agree) that if your heart is set on watch A, then buying cheaper watch B (which is a bit similar but not as nice), in an attempt to scratch the itch, is a futile pursuit.
But if watch A is a Vacheron Constantin 222, then a lot of people (myself included) will need to accept that it won't ever happen and might choose to look for a watch that shares some characteristics but at a much lower price-point.
I was thinking one approach is to choose watches that are in your budget but have a design integrity or enough unique attributes that they don't feel like lesser versions of something else. G-shocks are good for this as they could be argued to be the best or most desirable of their genre. But steel sports watches? Pilot's watches? I think it's harder.
I think you touched on a something that took me a very long time to learn in this hobby: I do not have to buy every watch I want, even if it is a grail watch. When I am dead and my collection is given to my family and friends, my journey as they say, is not likely to be any less satisfying without one specific watch. My tombstone will not say "He never overpaid for that limited edition JDM Seiko." (...and if it is somehow, the engraving better be misaligned!)But if watch A is a Vacheron Constantin 222, then a lot of people (myself included) will need to accept that it won't ever happen and might choose to look for a watch that shares some characteristics but at a much lower price-point.