Out of interest why are there so many college football games played on new years eve. Does new years eve mean very little in the US? I mean the CFP semi finals will be still be going coming up to near midnight, won't they? 
Football discussion violation! 15 yards and loss of down.Out of interest why are there so many college football games played on new years eve. Does new years eve mean very little in the US? I mean the CFP semi finals will be still be going coming up to near midnight, won't they?![]()
I suspect it is because a large part of their demographic are home from school or work during Taintmas (the time between X-mas and the new year) and concentrating it to one day creates a significant enough of a spike in television viewership to command a premium for television ad rates with both national and local television channels.Out of interest why are there so many college football games played on new years eve. Does new years eve mean very little in the US? I mean the CFP semi finals will be still be going coming up to near midnight, won't they?![]()
Agreed. And I know I needed the lesson.I think that the churn, and associated with that the wasted opportunities, is the thing I regret the most. When I look back at the watches I've sold and regret it's hard. But there's no better lesson.....
I think a lot of it’s from having so dang many bowls. The playoff system affected things. And after next year it goes from 4 teams to 12.Football discussion violation! 15 yards and loss of down.
Short answer: remnants of the old Bowl system, which was in place before the championship playoff system was finally put in place just in the past ten years. In the Bowl system two teams are rewarded for having a good season by playing another game between Christmas and New Years just for the fun of it. It's mostly a money-maker for the TV networks that carry the games, which are ultimately meaningless. It's a way for supporters of the teams to travel during the holidays, usually to warmer climates (Florida, California, Texas, Arizona, and Hawaii are very popular bowl game locations), and have a big, drunken party.
Back before playoffs, the important bowl games (Sugar, Rose, Fiesta, Orange) often pitted games amongst team that were highly ranked, such as number 1 vs, number 4 or something like that. After all the bowl games were completed, the sportswriters enlisted by the Associated Press would vote on who they thought would be crowned as the college football champion. It was a pretty dumb system and it took a lot of convincing to get a playoff system formulated and agreed to given how powerful the old bowl contracts were. As usual with sports, it's all about the money.
Money corrupts everything and US college sports are heading towards complete corruption. The recent NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) rulings will lead to enormous scandals with athletes getting screwed even more than they have in the past.
Finances are definitely what prompted me to join wpac. Looking at the amount of cash that went into it really was the red flag for me that something wasn't right. I haven't regretted selling anything though. I only ever sold watches because they didn't get the wrist time they deserved.Financial losses has always been a regret in this, but I can rationalise that as the price to play. I think the major regret is selling some watches that I should have probably held on to, ones that would have been perfect to live with for a long time, but the desire to be having the next shiny obsession realised clouded one's judgement.....
I must admit it looks nice, particularly for an ali x watch. I hope you will keep enjoying it though, even when the novelty will inevitably wear off.I may be changing. I used to not pay over £100 for a Chinese watch, which eliminated all mechanical chronographs despite the apparent similarity to the speedy pro for a fraction of the cost. So if I wouldn't pay £200 for a Ali Express, I decided £400 and now £500 for the same thing in a fancier package (ie studio underdog watermelon) wasn't great value.
I just broke my £100 rule and bought a Sugess Moonphase for about £135, (see near the end of WPAC 2022), and was much hammered for buying the temporary discount, but it's terrific. The moon is waxing strongly now, as you can see. If I ever contemplated a ST chronograph, I could see me adding one of a few Sugess models at around £200, but I really do not expect to buy a watch next year
I did spend £3 on this 21mm mesh bracelet for the Sugess though which arrived today.
View attachment 17127919
Welcome! That is a dangerous backdoor in your plan there though... TheAs promised I’m back — this time with a crappy SOTC shot. It’s missing one of my submersibles which will be listed for sale shortly. I plan to buy zero watches in 2023. Pretty serious about that commitment as I’m happy with what I have. But to be safe I’ll say that I will buy one watch if a unique deal presents itself as a one in one out with the aforementioned submersible.
![]()
Thanks for that, it makes me feel good knowing I’m not the only one on WPAC with a good sized stash.Just stopping by to say good luck this year and post a pic to hopefully help yawl feel better about your watch buying habits/issues....I didn't actually count how many watches I added/gave away this year but I added a lot less than typical years for me. I think I am close to being cured. Have a great year everyone! Keep up the good work Horny!
The Ho
View attachment 17127449
Generally an ali-x "moonphase" is exactly that, nothing more than an am/pm indicator. So not bad you got an actual moonphase complication.I vaguely thought a Moonphase would show a partial moon progressing across the sky each night, rather than the way it does actually work to be honest.
I am not sure about the am/pm indicator.Generally an ali-x "moonphase" is exactly that, nothing more than an am/pm indicator. So not bad you got an actual moonphase complication.
Maybe the slow pace is a good exercise in abstinence, one watch for an entire moon. We've done the "one watch for a week" exercise here before, as a way to learn to appreciate what you own instead of compulsively tickling your dopamine receptors with a different watch every day.
I've only ever played at the very affordable end. Buying and selling second hand G-Shocks is unlikely to result in huge losses. Some I make money on, some I lose.Financial losses has always been a regret in this, but I can rationalise that as the price to play. I think the major regret is selling some watches that I should have probably held on to, ones that would have been perfect to live with for a long time, but the desire to be having the next shiny obsession realised clouded one's judgement.....
WPAC was originally founded on total abstinence, based on my own and others experience of constant flipping, but over time that has evolved to be more, shall we say, sensible. The collection size is irrelevant or relevant depending upon the individual; you could have a massive collection but only acquire with much thought and consideration. Personally, I find massive collections ridiculous, as what's the point when you never wear them all, but again it all comes down to the individual. My view is based on wanting to have one or two watches that satisfy me, but just because that's what I want doesn't make it right for someone else. Lee_K has put it more eloquently than me before in saying that the aim is get to point of buying carefully, sensibly rather than buying the next shiny watch that is on trend.....This raises a nuanced existential question, where do such watches fit into WPAC if the club is founded on purchasing abstinence but not necessarily collection size and wearing habits? Is this something for the individual watch enthusiast to decide for themselves?
You have created a great micro-community here and I am proud to be accepted into it!WPAC was originally founded on total abstinence, based on my own and others experience of constant flipping, but over time that has evolved to be more, shall we say, sensible. The collection size is irrelevant or relevant depending upon the individual; you could have a massive collection but only acquire with much thought and consideration. Personally, I find massive collections ridiculous, as what's the point when you never wear them all, but again it all comes down to the individual. My view is based on wanting to have one or two watches that satisfy me, but just because that's what I want doesn't make it right for someone else. Lee_K has put it more eloquently than me before in saying that the aim is get to point of buying carefully, sensibly rather than buying the next shiny watch that is on trend.....
Total abstinence was originally employed as a technique for those suffering from the buy/flip cycle, to start appreciating what one had......