The first round.
GMT:
Seamasters:
GMT:


Seamasters:


While we'd love to test each watch, right now it's about getting a general consensus for each different movement. We will offer the option (at a small cost) to have this done for individual orders, but testing each one before it ships will add up (time-wise, pun intended) in a hurry.Very cool. Will you be testing each watch and shipping it with this card to show it was tested? That last Seamaster did pretty dam good, but why was the other so different?
At this price we're not going to start tampering with the inner workings; best to send it back to the factory if there is a serious problem or have a qualified pro use this information to adjust it. Keep in mind that our main function is to push the manufacturer to produce a better product, not fix it ourselves.If we have this timing data available for a fee, does that mean Alpha USA will adjust the watch, or at least find something that falls within an acceptable accuracy?
Sounds good to me :-!Keep in mind that our main function is to push the manufacturer to produce a better product, not fix it ourselves.
That's the whole point.. everyone here should ask themselves where they have see such data from another company before.I'm digging the transparency mate.
Nor worries, I know what lack of sleep can do:-dThank you, that's what I get when I can't sleep and I post.
My original post was an error and I have edited it.
Yeah I was checking them out on ofrei. The cheapest one is about $300 IIRC, and i'm kinda tempted to get one. But all the cheap one does is test accuracy, not beat error and amplitude. Seems like a simple thing for a piece of software to do with the right kind of microphone. Anyone heard of such a piece of software? I swear I've seen something like it in the watchmaking forum. Mebbe I'll go ask there.If anyone has any doubts that Alpha USA is taking this venture seriously, the Timegrapher they are using cost about $2000.00.
Wes