Joined
·
2,996 Posts
I had no idea this thread existed and I've spent the last week or so ploughing through the 1000+ posts. Cheers, much to admire and much to reflect on.Ladies and Gentlemen,
...
Now the onus is on the rest of you; what are your thoughts, collection, interpretation of dress watches? Hopefully there is enough interest to keep this thread alive and well.
Strictest | Strict | Widely Accepted | I'd Accept | |
Metal | White, Noble metal. | Colored or white noble metals. | Colored or white noble metals or stainless steel. | Any, just because carbon, PVD, titanium, ceramics etc weren't possible way back when, it doesn't mean that they can't form an elegant watch. |
Functions | Time only, two hands. | Time only, sub or central seconds allowable. Sub seconds is more appropriate. | Minimal functions allowed such as Date, Power Reserve. | Two hander on an automatic makes no sense to me. All complications can be discreet or showy e.g. Moser perpetual. So any, as long as the dial isn't busy. |
Indexes | Applied or printed stick Indexes. No Lume. | Applied or Printed stick indexes, or Roman Numerals. No Lume. | Indexes, Roman Numerals, Breguet Numerals or some mixture of the afore mentioned. Light lume acceptable. | Applied Arabic numerals can look very classy too. Again if it is elegantly done, it's OK. |
Strap | Black alligator / Croc. | Black or dark brown, exotic leather. | Black or Dark Brown, Tonal stitching with various leathers. | As with the rest of the watch, understated but quality |
Size | Small size for your wrist. | Modest size for your wrist. | Modern Size for your wrist. | Modest size for my wrist, sub 40mm in my case |
Thickness | Ultra slim (under 6mm). | Slim (under 9mm). | Slim (under a cuff). | Slim (under 10mm) but the slimmer the better. |
Bingo. Completely outdated.My take on the definition of what constitutes a dress watch... The 'rules' were initially constituted in a bygone age by short, bald men with moustaches who had probably served their country, wore a jacket and tie to do the gardening and wouldn't dream of popping down to the local store without wearing a hat.
Well, you can set up a thread with a view to people posting pictures of their whatever, and point out when they've posted a picture of something different. The trouble here is that 'a dress watch thread' using the strictest definition would have virtually no pictures so there has to be some leeway but that opens up individual interpretation.Bingo. Completely outdated.
Nobody has the legitimation to set rules in this thread or this forum
for taste issues.
View attachment 16255370
Jean-Claude Biver is rapt that you picked this as your dress watch grail!😉👍⌚I had no idea this thread existed and I've spent the last week or so ploughing through the 1000+ posts. Cheers, much to admire and much to reflect on.
My take on the definition of what constitutes a dress watch... The 'rules' were initially constituted in a bygone age by short, bald men with moustaches who had probably served their country, wore a jacket and tie to do the gardening and wouldn't dream of popping down to the local store without wearing a hat. In other words, the whole notion of formal wear has moved significantly and so watches should be considered in this light too. However, the essence of what made a dress watch a dress watch is still a desirable commodity, i.e. understated elegance, something that does not attract attention from afar but has all the hallmarks of quality up close.
Strictest Strict Widely Accepted I'd Accept Metal White, Noble metal. Colored or white noble metals. Colored or white noble metals or stainless steel. Any, just because carbon, PVD, titanium, ceramics etc weren't possible way back when, it doesn't mean that they can't form an elegant watch. Functions Time only, two hands. Time only, sub or central seconds allowable. Sub seconds is more appropriate. Minimal functions allowed such as Date, Power Reserve. Two hander on an automatic makes no sense to me. All complications can be discreet or showy e.g. Moser perpetual. So any, as long as the dial isn't busy. Indexes Applied or printed stick Indexes. No Lume. Applied or Printed stick indexes, or Roman Numerals. No Lume. Indexes, Roman Numerals, Breguet Numerals or some mixture of the afore mentioned. Light lume acceptable. Applied Arabic numerals can look very classy too. Again if it is elegantly done, it's OK. Strap Black alligator / Croc. Black or dark brown, exotic leather. Black or Dark Brown, Tonal stitching with various leathers. As with the rest of the watch, understated but quality Size Small size for your wrist. Modest size for your wrist. Modern Size for your wrist. Modest size for my wrist, sub 40mm in my case Thickness Ultra slim (under 6mm). Slim (under 9mm). Slim (under a cuff). Slim (under 10mm) but the slimmer the better.
My current ultimate dress watch if only I could afford it. My ultimate any watch to be fair.
View attachment 16253474
It's a nice thought. According to wikipedia, he gives away 5 tonnes of cheese for free every year. I'm not sure he cares what I think.Jean-Claude Biver is rapt that you picked this as your dress watch grail!😉👍⌚
Finally, a fresh interpretation of Arabic numerals. This is pretty cool.Just received this 35mm beauty. It's a Poljot Deluxe and bought it from Ucrania on ebay.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is fabulous! Love the numerals on it. Are the markers stamped/pressed or printed?Finally, a fresh interpretation of Arabic numerals. This is pretty cool.
Very thoughtful criteria in a highly readable format, thank you!I had no idea this thread existed and I've spent the last week or so ploughing through the 1000+ posts. Cheers, much to admire and much to reflect on.
My take on the definition of what constitutes a dress watch... The 'rules' were initially constituted in a bygone age by short, bald men with moustaches who had probably served their country, wore a jacket and tie to do the gardening and wouldn't dream of popping down to the local store without wearing a hat. In other words, the whole notion of formal wear has moved significantly and so watches should be considered in this light too. However, the essence of what made a dress watch a dress watch is still a desirable commodity, i.e. understated elegance, something that does not attract attention from afar but has all the hallmarks of quality up close.
Strictest Strict Widely Accepted I'd Accept Metal White, Noble metal. Colored or white noble metals. Colored or white noble metals or stainless steel. Any, just because carbon, PVD, titanium, ceramics etc weren't possible way back when, it doesn't mean that they can't form an elegant watch. Functions Time only, two hands. Time only, sub or central seconds allowable. Sub seconds is more appropriate. Minimal functions allowed such as Date, Power Reserve. Two hander on an automatic makes no sense to me. All complications can be discreet or showy e.g. Moser perpetual. So any, as long as the dial isn't busy. Indexes Applied or printed stick Indexes. No Lume. Applied or Printed stick indexes, or Roman Numerals. No Lume. Indexes, Roman Numerals, Breguet Numerals or some mixture of the afore mentioned. Light lume acceptable. Applied Arabic numerals can look very classy too. Again if it is elegantly done, it's OK. Strap Black alligator / Croc. Black or dark brown, exotic leather. Black or Dark Brown, Tonal stitching with various leathers. As with the rest of the watch, understated but quality Size Small size for your wrist. Modest size for your wrist. Modern Size for your wrist. Modest size for my wrist, sub 40mm in my case Thickness Ultra slim (under 6mm). Slim (under 9mm). Slim (under a cuff). Slim (under 10mm) but the slimmer the better.
My current ultimate dress watch if only I could afford it. My ultimate any watch to be fair.
View attachment 16253474
I love that! I think I saw that @Chronopolis has one too. As I mentioned before, the font on the numerals is enthrallingJust received this 35mm beauty. It's a Poljot Deluxe and bought it from Ucrania on ebay.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()