WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

1 - 20 of 26 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
97 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
The history of straps and bracelets for diving watches

The development of the new class watches was initiated by the creation of specialized bracelets. Waterproof watches at the beginning of the 20th century were equipped with leather straps impregnated with grease or wax, so that they would absorb less water. The first producer who went seriously to the problem of creating a waterproof strap was Omega while working on the model Marine. The brand from Bienne used a strap made of seal leather with an integrated and adjustable clasp. Leather straps of various types were used during World War II in military watches such as Panerai.
Marine 7.jpg
1. Omega Marine strap.

In 1947, Rolex introduced the Oyster bracelet to the collection of its sports watches. In 1952, the design was supplemented with an element commonly known today as a endlinks. This type of bracelet has been used on GMT-Master, Explorer, and most of all since 1954 in Submariner divers. The project turned out to be so successful that it remained on the equipment of the Submariner and Sea-Dweller collections to this day. Over the years, the Oyster design has undergone numerous modifications. In 1969, an additional safety buckle was used to avoid unintentional opening of the bracelet. A regulation system was also introduced, which was then replaced by a microregulation patented under the name Glidelock. Despite these changes, the Oyster bracelet has not lost its original DNA.
3.10.2.PNG
2. Oyster bracelet.

In 1957, Breitling was one of the first producers of diving watches to use braided Milanese bracelets (popularly called mesh or shark) on watches from the Superocean collection. One of the early manufacturers of these bracelets was the German company Vollmer operating in Pforzheim from 1922. Vollmer supplied many manufactures producing diving watches. One of the more well-known watches with this type of bracelet was the Omega Seamaster 600 Ploprof.
In the 1950s, steel bracelets became a standard on diver watches and were offered by almost all manufacturers. There were companies specializing in their production on the market, such as the Swiss NSA or the German Expandro. High class bracelets of various types were offered by Gay Frères S.A. Twisted bracelets of the Twist-O-Flex or Fixo-Flex type of the American-German company Speidel were also very popular.

5.25..PNG
3. Types of bracelets used in diver watches. From the top: rubber strap, Nato strap, NSA bracelet, expandro bracelet with micro-adjustment, silicone strap and Milanese bracelet. Fig. author

After World War II, rubber became more and more popular in industry. The watchmaking industry quickly used this elastomer for its own needs. The first application was gaskets, then rubber straps appeared. Their unquestionable advantage was total water resistance. Since the late 1950s, Tropic strapes with ventilation holes were very popular. The disadvantage of early rubber straps was their stiffness and susceptibility to cracking.
Paski 2.jpg
4. Tropic and Safari rubber straps.

At the end of the 1960s, the Izofrane company started the production of straps using Izoprene. Because it was a colorless compound, it was possible to introduce a different color palette for finished products. The material was also more flexible than regular rubber. In the 1970s, Seiko, in the line of his professional dive watches, used rubber straps with compressive and tensile sections, so that they fit into the suit depending on the water pressure. This types is still used today.

The introduction of silicon into the production increased the resistance of the straps to high temperatures and chemical factors. Other materials used for the production of specialized straps include Cordura, Perlon and various types of synthetic materials.

In 1970, belts with the symbol G10 went to equip the British army. Thanks to their durability they gained great popularity among soldiers. Initially, they were sold from surplus military magazines, from where they entered the civil market. Soon production was started, and due to its origin they gained the general name of NATO. Also, these types of straps are often used on watches that are in contact with water.
5.11..PNG
5. Nato strap.
Currently, all tested materials are used for the production of specialized diving straps.
Apart from the basic function, the strapes also had an additional purpose. Some manufacturers, such as Citizen, have applied miniaturized decompression tables. It was also a common practice to attach a small compass to the bar.




This is another topic that I move in the book about diving watches history - "Czas na głębokości" ( English version - autumn 2019) #czasnagłębokości
Książka 16.jpg
Książka 5.jpg
Książka 11.jpg
Książka 26.jpg
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
304 Posts
It's a fascinating problem. If you really do end up in the water, what strap do you want?

Leather is great, but it rots. Rubber/silicone is great, but it slowly oxidizes and fails. Nylon/synthetic stretches in the water so the fit becomes loose (and then you have to unbuckle to tighten). Steel bracelets are great, but the spring bars are a fail point...

These days I'm with SS because I hate replacing straps.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,810 Posts
Can’t wait until the English version is ready! Well done


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,096 Posts
It's a fascinating problem. If you really do end up in the water, what strap do you want?
Leather is great, but it rots. Rubber/silicone is great, but it slowly oxidizes and fails. Nylon/synthetic stretches in the water so the fit becomes loose (and then you have to unbuckle to tighten). Steel bracelets are great, but the spring bars are a fail point...
Unless you're in the water day in day out any choice is fine. I don't look at straps as a permanent thing anyway. They might have to be replaced someday, which is OK by me as I like variety/change. Spring bars would be a fail point of any of the above I'd think?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
129 Posts
Unless you're in the water day in day out any choice is fine. I don't look at straps as a permanent thing anyway. They might have to be replaced someday, which is OK by me as I like variety/change. Spring bars would be a fail point of any of the above I'd think?
Not all, with NATO straps you need two springbar failures for the watch to leave your wrist. That's a big win when in the water (well, outside the water too). Also, with long NATO straps the buckle can be stopped being a single point of failure too with the typical tuck over or under of the strap that will keep it place.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,096 Posts
Not all, with NATO straps you need two springbar failures for the watch to leave your wrist. That's a big win when in the water (well, outside the water too). Also, with long NATO straps the buckle can be stopped being a single point of failure too with the typical tuck over or under of the strap that will keep it place.
He didn't specifically mention Nato, but you're correct, it's a little bit safer.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
129 Posts
He didn't specifically mention Nato, but you're correct, it's a little bit safer.
No, but be mentioned "any", that includes Nato.

Mateusz: Those are two fantastic watches. What's the story with the Monvis number indexes? Anyone tried to restore the 6 but left the 9 and 12 as they where?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
304 Posts
He didn't specifically mention Nato, but you're correct, it's a little bit safer.
Yes, nato is what I had in mind. The problem I've experienced with such straps is that they expand in the water, and the fit becomes loose. Maybe that's not as big a deal as I feel it is, but it sort of freaks me out. But you are correct - you'd need two failures to lose the watch to a springbar fail...

Mateusz P., curious, do you have any data on how long a springbar can survive in the water before it rusts and becomes prone to failure?

Am I paranoid? Yes. I once lost a watch in heavy surf and have no idea how it got off my wrist...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,096 Posts
No, but be mentioned "any", that includes Nato.
Sorry to nitpick but he didn't mention any: "Leather is great, but it rots. Rubber/silicone is great, but it slowly oxidizes and fails. Nylon/synthetic stretches in the water so the fit becomes loose (and then you have to unbuckle to tighten). Steel bracelets are great, but the spring bars are a fail point..."

I responded and said "any", and what I meant was "any of the those mentioned" are fine. I wasn't thinking Nato specifically when he said Nylon but I see now that's what he meant :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
304 Posts
Can anyone explain to me why a rubber strap for my Oris Aquis without buckle costs over 300 dollars?
Mr. Oris himself has to travel to South America, and then hike to his grove of rubber trees. Once he has collected the sap for your watch strap, he must hike it back, boil it, add dye, and then mold it. After he has hand-hammered the buckle and added that, he ships it to you. $300.00 is a steal and barely covers room and board during the South American leg of the process. Of course the buckle costs extra.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,017 Posts
Mr. Oris himself has to travel to South America, and then hike to his grove of rubber trees. Once he has collected the sap for your watch strap, he must hike it back, boil it, add dye, and then mold it. After he has hand-hammered the buckle and added that, he ships it to you. $300.00 is a steal and barely covers room and board during the South American leg of the process.
would be a lot cheaper if he simply took a tent, but Egyptian gods are an entitled bunch
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,568 Posts
would be a lot cheaper if he simply took a tent, but Egyptian gods are an entitled bunch
And don't forget about the bribes for customs officials, they add up.

Here's hope that this book does come out in English!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mateusz P.
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Top