I really considered the RM but I preferred the 300 in the end because of the sportier look and the WR which makes it a true allrounder.
Good luck with that! We all say that too often lol. My vintage one says hi hopefully we can both keep this rare promiseJust got my MK II Speedy, had the bracelet sized and I'm in love. This is my first proper watch purchase and I can already tell. This one isn't leaving my collection ever.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I’m still surprised that I can wear the 300MC with its 41mm and the RMLE with its 38mm on my 8” wrist. But I’m very tempted to sell the 300MC and replace it with a Seamaster LE. Time will tell...Thanks Ken, yes indeed the 300MC has to go cause it looks like a hockey puck on my small wrist. The LE wears a lot smaller and is perfect for me.
My wrist is 6.2“ so the LE clearly makes sense for me. The small and less shiny bezel makes a huge difference compared to the 300MC. The bracelet is also less blingy with the brushed centre links, and I prefer the new endlinks as well. As you prefer smaller watches the LE is definitely worth a try.
PS: there are some comparison pics 300MC/300LE in the trilogy owners thread and in the trilogy thread over at omegaforums. They show the difference between the two quite well.