[JBAV8R]

My last post was quite long winded. I am quite sure I know which way this will go, but I wanted to see what reactions and reasons I may get with this far narrower list.
This brings to light a suggestion submitted by another member in contest with the hands down winner of the last poll.

Without further ado. Please pick one with reasoning behind it please!

This: $2700

or

That:$4200

 

[Barnaby'sDad]

The Ball GMT is a good looking watch. The Tudor BB and GMT don’t do anything for me (I’ve checked them out in person). I.e. I can’t stand the rivet bracelet.

 

[JBAV8R]

The Ball GMT is a good looking watch. The Tudor BB and GMT don’t do anything for me (I’ve checked them out in person). I.e. I can’t stand the rivet bracelet.

Thanks. Added the poll. Dunno why it didn’t work first time I posted

 

[CuriousBob]

This. The Ball looks great.

 

[LosAngelesTimer]

I'd go Tudor without a moment's hesitation. I find most Balls to be over-styled.

 

[Thunder1]

The Tudor, w/o question..great movement & looks..

 

[domayotte]

Interesting choices. I am going to vote for the Ball. First, let me say I am a Tudor fan, I own a Tudor (different model) and it is an incredibly accurate watch. This one is great looking.

But I voted for the Ball for the incredible lume, and the hands are better than the Tudor. Ball has a great heritage, and all of the specs are impressive. And it’s less pricey with comparable performance and specs.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Wandering_Watcher10]

Autavia GMT was just released by Tag. Should consider it. The bracelet and finishing is really nice.

 

[Earthbound2]

The Jet Set! Better looking in most regards to my eyes. Not a fan of the slab sided Tudor gmt. Plus you get tritium with the Ball. If I remember correctly, it’s also cosc.

 

[Chris Hughes]

The Ball is cool.

The Tudor is meh.

 

[6R15]

Not a fan of Tudor, but I say go for that as it'll be much easier for you to sell vs the Ball when you inevitably get tired of it a week after wearing it.

 

[JBAV8R]

Autavia GMT was just released by Tag. Should consider it. The bracelet and finishing is really nice.

View attachment 16419866

That has an ETA “office“ GMT movemen, correct

 

[Buschyfor3]

Tudor. Because it looks better

 

[ajbutler13]

The Ball is quite a bit busier. I prefer the Tudor.

 

[Wandering_Watcher10]

That has an ETA “office“ GMT movemen, correct

I believe it's a Selita SW300;

The Autavia GMT 3 Hands 60th Anniversary is powered by the Calibre 7 COSC GMT movement whose chronometric precision is certified by the Swiss Official Chronometer Testing Institute. Beating at the frequency of 28,800 vibrations per hour (4 Hz), it guarantees a power reserve of 50 hours.

 

[Purple Hayz]

Tudor. Never a good idea to have just one Ball.

 

[JPa]

Autavia GMT was just released by Tag. Should consider it. The bracelet and finishing is really nice.

View attachment 16419866

Of the three posted so far, I vote for this one. The other two don’t move the interest needle at all.

 

[Wandering_Watcher10]

Of the three posted so far, I vote for this one. The other two don’t move the interest needle at all.

It's a great watch. I have the Autavia 3-hander, and love the quick switch strap/bracelet combo.

 

[Sugman]

I voted for this. I’m just not a fan of that.

 

[Colmustard86]

Ball, it is unique and more its own thing.