WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Is Tudor Diet Rolex

Tudor is just Diet Rolex

6232 Views 203 Replies 118 Participants Last post by  orpheo
I was chatting with a friend, and of course we discussed time pieces, the obvious subject of Rolex vs. Omega came up (we happen to love both, and have pieces from both brands), but somehow he asked me about the Pelagos.
I know the history of Tudor, but it is not a brand that I have bought before (the Harrods looks very cool, would I buy it? No.) so I said ‘hmm not sure never had it on wrist…’
To which his response was ‘I don’t blame you, Tudor is just a diet Rolex.’
I do see the similarity in case and dial designs…and of course the history behind Tudor, but where do you stand on Tudor, is it a diet Rolex? Or is it its own brand with its own style, and history?
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 204 Posts
I voted yes, but I like to watch things burn too…
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
Diet? That’s harsh.
It is hard to not view them as a sub brand if Rolex though. I don’t think of Tudor as a separate entity.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
:rolleyes:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
Diet? That’s harsh.
It is hard to not view them as a sub brand if Rolex though. I don’t think of Tudor as a separate entity.
Diet? Tudor's cases are much thicker 🤣
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
No. Tudor is Tudor. How can it be a diet Rolex?

I think this thread is going to be entertaining. :p
Cartoon Water Organism Mode of transport Art
See less See more
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Helpful
Reactions: 5
👀
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Tudor seems more of a Rolex "Lite". Not bad watches, though.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Tudor is Tudor.
Rolex is Rolex.
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
Omega is diet Rolex.

Rolex is diet San Martin
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
man this thread is not going to end well...
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
Hot take! 😐

Man, threads like this are not only tiresome AF but they say more about the gossamer ego of the poster than they do about anything related to watches.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Maybe once upon a time Tudor was Rolex-lite, but I don't think you can say that anymore.
The modern Tudor, built around the success of the Black Bay, has built a brand identity over the past 10 years that many watch companies would be jealous of.
  • Like
  • Helpful
Reactions: 5
Tudor doesn't make bio ceramic plastic watches with chrono pushers that fall off.
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5
I see it as a little bit of both. I have a 1960s Small Rose Tudor that has obvious signs of its Rolex lineage. Including the Oyster case and Rolex crown. The BB58 has definite DNA from the Rolex Sub. Yet other models and the Snowflake hand are distinctively Tudor.

I find nothing wrong with Tudor being positioned where it is in the luxury watch market.
  • Like
  • Helpful
Reactions: 4
Can we expand this and do it for the Swatch group plz?!
  • Like
Reactions: 1
They probably used to be for a long time.. More recently though I see them as a capable prestige brand in their own right.. As much so as anything else in their category.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 20 of 204 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top