Tudor is just Diet Rolex
- Status
41 - 60 of 204 Posts
Joined
·
1,082 Posts
I've tried with Tudor...only their Advisor actually looks good. I tried the Pelagos, but it feels awful on the wrist. I tried a few of their other models, but they're either too tall or just unrefined when compared with Rolex.
I will never begrudge someone wearing what they love; that's my rule, of course: 'Buy what you love, and to hell with the rest'. My personal opinion on the brand however is not in the 'positive' column. I don't love Tudor as a brand, nor do I find their design aesthetic attractive or compelling in the least.
I fall quite happily in the camp of people who, if given a free choice between a Rolex and its Tudor counterpart, I'd choose the Rolex every time. Then again, I seem to choose Omega over Rolex every time too...so I guess I don't have a horse in the race.
I haven't seen anyone say anything controversial in this thread...so perhaps the popcorn should wait. Maybe I should try...
"Tudor will always be a budget step down from Rolex, and Rolex will ensure that this relationship stays this way forever."
How about that?
I will never begrudge someone wearing what they love; that's my rule, of course: 'Buy what you love, and to hell with the rest'. My personal opinion on the brand however is not in the 'positive' column. I don't love Tudor as a brand, nor do I find their design aesthetic attractive or compelling in the least.
I fall quite happily in the camp of people who, if given a free choice between a Rolex and its Tudor counterpart, I'd choose the Rolex every time. Then again, I seem to choose Omega over Rolex every time too...so I guess I don't have a horse in the race.
I haven't seen anyone say anything controversial in this thread...so perhaps the popcorn should wait. Maybe I should try...
"Tudor will always be a budget step down from Rolex, and Rolex will ensure that this relationship stays this way forever."
How about that?
Joined
·
2,123 Posts
100% agree. Great watches you mentioned there, very interesting and compelling, while Rolex makes a left hand watch... After they saw the success of the Pelagos Left-hander...
So Rolex IS diet San Martin?
Naw, it's a poor-man's Rolex.
I still can't get over the clown laughing at me. Prolly never will.
I still can't get over the clown laughing at me. Prolly never will.
Joined
·
18,803 Posts
Yes AND no.
Before Tudor pulled away from most of Europe and the N. American market, when Tudor used/shared Rolex cases/bracelets/crowns, absolutely! It was "Rolex Lite", as Hans positioned it to be.
Now, especially after the launch of their own in-house movements, no...it certainly is not. If nothing else it's going where Rolex is not dipping their toes into, both in terms of designs (Monte Carlo, P01, Glamour double-date...) and material (silicon balance spring, bronze/silver/ceramic cases) use.
Before Tudor pulled away from most of Europe and the N. American market, when Tudor used/shared Rolex cases/bracelets/crowns, absolutely! It was "Rolex Lite", as Hans positioned it to be.
Now, especially after the launch of their own in-house movements, no...it certainly is not. If nothing else it's going where Rolex is not dipping their toes into, both in terms of designs (Monte Carlo, P01, Glamour double-date...) and material (silicon balance spring, bronze/silver/ceramic cases) use.
Joined
·
877 Posts
Diet. Hans specifically developed Tudor to be the cheaper alternative to Rolex. His vision was if you can‘t afford Rolex, choose Tudor.
In the modern era Tudor has had the flexibility to get a bit more . . . creative, which is good. In addition, they‘ve always been good value for money, since Tudor SA has never manufactured a single watch component. They‘re good at assembly and testing, though. And were smart enough to be a part of Kenissi.
At this point they are a fine brand on their own.
In the modern era Tudor has had the flexibility to get a bit more . . . creative, which is good. In addition, they‘ve always been good value for money, since Tudor SA has never manufactured a single watch component. They‘re good at assembly and testing, though. And were smart enough to be a part of Kenissi.
At this point they are a fine brand on their own.
Joined
·
56,179 Posts
I thought Rolex is a fattened up San Martin?
Joined
·
56,179 Posts
Ah... the Black Bay Watch Co.
Joined
·
5,975 Posts
Yeah, I love their Sweet Chilli and Sour Cream chips.Ah... the Black Bay Watch Co.
I voted “no” but it is hard to deny that that is the reputation Tudor had for many years and still has with the bigger audience, including some collectors.
It is also undeniable the big effort of the recent times (let’s say last 10 years?) to start building a proper image with more personal design and image. So hopefully in the near future this will finally change.
It is also undeniable the big effort of the recent times (let’s say last 10 years?) to start building a proper image with more personal design and image. So hopefully in the near future this will finally change.
Joined
·
336 Posts
It's funny how many Rolex owners firmly believe that Rolex is the be-all end-all of watches. There is no other watch fanbase that enjoys ragging on other brands as much as Rolex'.
Would Tudor be what it is today if by associated with Rolex, doubtful. Calling it diet/poor mans Rolex though is a stretch IMO.
Would Tudor be what it is today if by associated with Rolex, doubtful. Calling it diet/poor mans Rolex though is a stretch IMO.
Joined
·
14,484 Posts
Mine is German, but I definitely accept and approve of your post.
Joined
·
14,484 Posts
ah yes, Pforzheim - its a beauty
41 - 60 of 204 Posts
- Status
Join the discussion
