Joined
·
2,517 Posts
Thanks for the breaking news 😜
Thanks for the breaking news 😜
What would be a PO variant of a PO UD?Really hoping Omega makes a PO variant of these watches. They would absolutely dominate.
Agreed. Omega keeping up with the Jonese's. (Or in Swiss, Johannes)...🤣This watch is just because Omega can. None of the buyers are going to free dive 3+ miles deep. It is an in your face Rolex watch.
To be more specific, a 600M PO with tech from the UD to make it thinner.What would be a PO variant of a PO UD?
Not quite!Agreed. Omega keeping up with the Jonese's. (Or in Swiss, Johannes)...🤣
Fair enough, the PO has definitely become a real thick watch ever since the master chronometer variants.I have 7.5-7.75" wrists, so I can wear a large watch no problem. But I finally got rid of my Planet Ocean because I always felt it on my wrist as too thick for comfort, 16+mm. I'm sure as heck not going to get something even thicker.
The UD had to be thick to get a 6000M rating. Just the crystal is 5 mm thick. The UD is not a practical watch for any normal human endeavor. It is only good for showing off.Making it thinner should be possible but thin-ness hasn't been a priority for Omega dive watches so who knows.
I meant making the standard 600M PO thinner should be possible.The UD had to be thick to get a 6000M rating. Just the crystal is 5 mm thick. The UD is not a practical watch for any normal human endeavor. It is only good for showing off.
The UD is a failure for popular attention compared to the Omega Swatch.
I do not see why not. We are looking at a watch that's now 6+ years old on the shelves and perhaps much older on the drawing board (compared to today). Tech and fabrication techniques have evolved as Omega has shown with recent releases of SM300 and UD.I meant making the standard 600M PO thinner should be possible.
The UD is not intended for popular attention (just as the DSSD wasn't) -The UD is a failure for popular attention compared to the Omega Swatch.
Nah....but just because you can't pull it off there are plenty of people who will daily wear it, or a DSSD, or other big, thick divers. To say that it's only a show off watch is silly....Simon nailed it above.The UD is not a practical watch for any normal human endeavor. It is only good for showing off.
I couldn't agree more and could not have said it better myself.The UD is not intended for popular attention (just as the DSSD wasn't) -
it is a technological feat, a yah boo to Rolex, and an answer to the many Omega fans who asked for a wearable UD. The R&D involved will be transferred to other models down the line
and it is not "only good for showing off" - it will be good to simply own and wear because it is a superb looking watch and a brilliant engineering achievement.
Sadly I was In NYC for business the week before last and the store on 5th Ave was closed by the time I was free. I would have loved to check one of these monsters out!This was the flagship Omega boutique on 5th ave, around 54th st or something.
They might not have the samples anymore, my guy was telling me that the NYC boutique acts as a sort of hub for these things. They send the samples off to other OBs before getting them back and sending them off again. Probably best to give them a call before you go in if you just want to see the UD samples.
I can "pull it off", that is a 49 mm on my wrist. Plenty can wear it but no one will dive down 3.7 miles; is what I meant by "just for show".Nah....but just because you can't pull it off there are plenty of people who will daily wear it, or a DSSD, or other big, thick divers. To say that it's only a show off watch is silly....Simon nailed it above.