WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

When did copies become homages?

18861 Views 537 Replies 144 Participants Last post by  Fahoo Forays
When did copies become homages? I'm curious, how this came about? To me a homage is a watch that makes reference to another iconic watch, inspiration or repurposing a desirable feature or design. For example a watch with Oyster case and sterile dial with sword hands but with Fifty Fathom like bezel, to me that would be a homage to Fifty Fathom and possibly vintage military dive watches.

But I'm curious how the WUS or watch community has come to accept copies like Steinhart, Invicta Pro Diver, or Tissell Explorer as being homages, when in fact they are copies. Homage would be pay respecting to the original. This is just ripping off the original design.

I understand some people don't like homages of any kind. I'm OK with a watch that combines features from others, and apply some flair of their own. But I see so many straight copies that are called homages and I don't understand it, since they are clearly not homages, they are copies.

And some people also seem to not able to understand a copy and replica are no the same thing. I"m not saying Steinhart or Davaso make Rolex replicas, but they certainly are making Rolex copies.

To me calling these watches homages is an insult to other watches that are actually homages, as it puts a watch with interesting character of their own in the same basket with these lame copies.
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: 5
461 - 480 of 538 Posts
I also agree they are not exactly the same otherwise it would be a 'copy'.

But would you agree or disagree with the following statement: "The Steinhart is not based on an original Steinhart design"?
Sure. They make homages of older Rolex and Tudor models.

The people who buy it don't say to themselves, look what a cool design, I don't know it in this way, I like it, I'll take it. Rather, they buy it because it's very close to the original.
Can't speak to others intentions.

I personally got the Steinflake because i don't do vintage.
Watch Plant Gesture Clock Finger

I can afford any Tudor, but they're currently not making anything that I'd want to wear, so the Steinhart was as close as i could get.

It turned out to be a bit too small for my taste, so i rarely wear it. But i haven't been ashamed of owning it for a second.

But i would probably get a Tudor if they made something i actually like.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Diving Watches are NOT clones or homages of the Submariner. They look the way they look because of ISO6425.
And yet the Polaris has its own look while meeting the ISO requirements.
But you might just find to your surprise that what people who buy "homage" watches do, is just wear a watch they like, knowing it is made by a different company to the original, because they like the design. And that's the end of the story, despite what you might want to project onto it.
Very succinctly put. You have stated the rub well. To paraphrase, “I like your work, but will pay bubba over here to use your design language give me a cheap thrill.” It mat be legal, but it is no more moral than making a copy of a cd rather than paying the artist who created the songs.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I've been to two world fairs, a bunch of rodeos, some chicken fights, and a goat breeding but I've never seen a place like this website. There are more snobs here than you can shake a stick at. I'm not kidding anyone, I buy watches that appeal to me based on looks, features, movement, build quality, and my budget not because they look like something else. I don't care a bit if they happen to be copies of this or that.
I bet you touch yourself when you look at those pictures.
You do realize cock fighting is illegal - right? I suppose it’s those snobby cops that break it up and arrest all there…
Very succinctly put. You have stated the rub well. To paraphrase, “I like your work, but will pay bubba over here to use your design language give me a cheap thrill.” It mat be legal, but it is no more moral than making a copy of a cd rather than paying the artist who created the songs.
That would require payment of royalties, otherwise it is more or less bootlegging and that is illegal. Very different, and in any event, morals - as we know - are entirely personal and subjective, however free you are to exercise them.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Adidas won a lawsuit worth millions because they didn't want their shoes being "homaged" anymore. Adding or removing a stripe and not trying to pass them off as Adidas (payless brand) was enough for them to win the case.

View attachment 17145668

I could care less what anyone wears on their wrist but if this were that big of a deal for the watch companies then they should take legal action.

Seems like no one really cares enough...except when this thread appears...every few days.

Cheers gents...wear what you like.
Yeah but everybody knows you can't take on Big Footwear and win. Those guys are connected at the highest levels.
Yeah but everybody knows you can't take on Big Footwear and win. Those guys are connected at the highest levels.
Well, there was news yesterday that Adidas lost their lawsuit against Thom Browne:

There is a very revealing paragraph as follows:
’Thom Browne said confusion between the companies' designs was unlikely because they "operate in different markets, serving different customers, and offer their products at strikingly different price points." It also said stripes are a common design element for clothing.’​
Does anyone seriously think that a Steinhart homage/copy/ripoff/whatever-you-choose-to-call-it will be confused with an actual Rolex?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I would like to point out that the way a discussion develops and how people reply to comments is a function of the comments they are replying to.

If you go back to page 1 of this thread, it is not the people questioning the character of people who wear expensive watches who appear and comment first. No - it is the people making negative statements about the character of people who wear design copies. This causes push-back, and defines the way the discussion develops.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
That’s a rather strong accusation in your first paragraph. Do you have any actual proof of that or are you just parroting some drivel that you read on the internet?
The really good counterfeits come from Turkey not China.
Turkeys are homages to chickens.
It would really be interesting to know who actually buys a Steinhart.

Are the majority of buyers found outside of watch fora?

If this can be answered with 'yes' it is of a lesser concern.

But it is really bad if people hanging around on WUS and spending an awful lot of time here then hit the ground running and order a Steinhart.

Those people should really know better.
I own two Steinys. An Ocean One Vintage Military, and an Ocean One Vintage Dual Time. Beautiful well-made watches.

I also own about 100 other watches, including two Breitlings, a TAG Heuer, a Bell & Ross (I could go on).

So, yeah, even people who can afford and own pricier watches can still enjoy well made homages.

Just to freak you out, until recently I also enjoyed wearing my Seestern Doxa-like, but I recently gave it to my son.

Not all of us here are snobs (thank god)








See less See more
8
  • Like
Reactions: 5
I would like to point out that the way a discussion develops and how people reply to comments is a function of the comments they are replying to.

If you go back to page 1 of this thread, it is not the people questioning the character of people who wear expensive watches who appear and comment first. No - it is the people making negative statements about the character of people who wear design copies. This causes push-back, and defines the way the discussion develops.
100% this. You see it in every homage threads. The negative attacks come first from the usual homage haters, not the other way around. And it's always the same posters who start the negative attacks. Without fail.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
100% this. You see it in every homage threads. The negative attacks come first from the usual homage haters, not the other way around. And it's always the same posters who start the negative attacks. Without fail.
Those are the 13 members i was talking about on page 1.
Without fail, they seek out this topic to let their toxicity flow.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Man, should us poor folks with good and similar tastes just go away? Would that make you guys happy....for once?
No. If the Huns had made it all the way across Europe they would have turned around and killed everybody that parted their hair on the right all the way back to the Sea of Japan.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
So my point was to the general public a Rolex “homage” where the only difference is the printed or applied logo is a counterfeit. Respect the people who did it first, they usually do it the best. Sorry there is a difference between Tylenol and stop and shops pain reliever. They perform similarly but Tylenol is just the better option. Poor analogy perhaps
"Where the only difference is the logo" - that makes it a counterfeit? If I tried to sell a Steinhart to someone, claiming it was a Rolex, how do you think that would play out when they looked at the logo on the dial. You can't credibly say a Steinhart is a counterfeit. Or, if you do, then you clearly don't understand the law.
"Where the only difference is the logo" - that makes it a counterfeit? If I tried to sell a Steinhart to someone, claiming it was a Rolex, how do you think that would play out when they looked at the logo on the dial. You can't credibly say a Steinhart is a counterfeit. Or, if you do, then you clearly don't understand the law.
More of a euphemism than an interpretation of law, I never claimed to be a J.D. on patent law or copyright law. This is a watch forum, but if you can share exact statutes that would be a great contribution I suppose.
OT for a moment but that Aerospace with its dial lit up is absolutely awesome!
  • Like
Reactions: 1
More of a euphemism than an interpretation of law, I never claimed to be a J.D. on patent law or copyright law. This is a watch forum, but if you can share exact statutes that would be a great contribution I suppose.
Ok. The Crown vs I. Don Givvatoss, 1873
You see it in every homage thread. The negative attacks come first from those misinformed about what is meant by an homage, not the other way around. And it's always the same posters who start the negative attacks. Without fail.
FIFY.
OT for a moment but that Aerospace with its dial lit up is absolutely awesome!
Thanks man! It's a Cockpit B50, a grail of mine for years. I pulled the trigger last summer I frickin love it it's a BEAST
  • Like
Reactions: 1
This thread takes a lot of twists in turns from a veritable case study in logical fallacies to self realization in real-time to legalese. none of that is a bad thing, in my opinion, on a forum. It’s definitely given me a little perspective in weighing my own opinion on the matter.

I’ve certainly bought Homages. My first three adult watches of any significance we’re homages whether I was aware or not. The first watch I ever bought with my own money was a fake PP on Canal st when I was 12, completely unaware of the existence of Patek Philippe. I own two homages now, although they aren’t 1:1 they’re clearly inspired by. And I’ve developed, in my acquiring more watches, away from homages fairly quickly. Mostly because my ideal of amassing a hoard of watches has segued into something else. But, I appreciate where buying “affordable alternatives,” as I view them in my particular use, took me and I don’t regret them.

So my opinion, which you have no reason to care about, has been greatly influenced by this thread and I attribute it to how I relate to another aspect of my personal experience with being a guitar builder who was involved forums heavily:

The great debates of guitar builder forums as well as guitar players forums was the term “hand made,” and what that constituted. There were builders who purchased bodies and necks from distributors that were pre-painted and assembled in house, builders who designed guitars and had the parts built and assembled outsourced, guys that used CNC machines, guys that only used hand tools, guys that made original models, models inspired by vintage models and everything you can imagine. All hanging the Hand Made shingle on their shop.

My opinion on this: Every guitar builder ends at the same point, a guitar. There are some builders who literally start from felling a tree, seasoning the lumber and hand planing the billets. I’ve done it, mostly as a personal exercise. So if you imagine a time-line of a guitar from the moment the builder starts building it to the moment it’s strung up, every guitar from the Chinese Fender factory to the guy boiling linseed over candles to make lacquer started with Forestry and ended with assembly. Where the final assembler starts on that time line varies from builder to builder and a lot of cases guitar to guitar. He may use hand tools originally and CNC later as production, time, space or finance allows or demands.

So what and who does this matter to?

If the time-line of Forestry to Assembly was a line left to right and each builder begins building somewhere along that line I found that most builders agreed that just about everyone to the right of them on that imaginary line we’re assemblers and they and everyone to the left were builders of hand made instruments. And they could rationalize that how it needed to be rationalized, “I use CNC because the demand is too high, but there is no skill in operating a band saw anyway, so I’m just saving time.”
And who am I to argue with them?

So who does this matter to?

It didn’t really matter to me. I made 15-20 guitars a year. The only thing I cared about was selling what I made. Which made me think about who it mattered to. Builders were largely interested in how they were perceived and how it effected market equity compared to their competition. Which made me realize, there is no competition. Me and the 1000 other builders were targeting a fraction of a percent of guitar buyers. If there were 1000 people in the world who would buy my guitar on a Tuesday and they found something else first that 1/1000 of a potential sale lost effected me in no perceivable way.

So the only person that really cared or matter was the end user. And that’s if they even cared if it was hand made at all. Which they probably didn’t.

It occurred to me that the entire reason their was a guitar builders forum was because nobody cared about guitar builders building guitars and all us builders wanted to do was tell people about how we spent huge amounts of our time. Which reminds me a lot of this debate. The problem people have with homages, maybe, is that nobody asks them what kind of watch they have. So what watch they have is a matter other peoples perception. If you’re wearing a Nautilus on the corner of 5th and Main I don’t really care if it’s a AP or from A&P. But it matters to the person who bought it. It places them on an imaginary line where there are folks to the left and folks to the right and the correct view is from where they’re standing. And there’s nothing wrong or weird about that. The end user made that choice for a personal reason.

Set aside, fraud and legal standing and deception, marketing, research, manufacturing and status and assume the person legally obtained what they think they obtained, the end user is the only thing that matters. Patents expire, designers move, laws change. It becomes pointless to debate the finer of point of whether a pad printing or applied markers make a watch a homage or a iteration to everyone except the person wearing, whose personal idea of that may change.

So remember to ask strangers what watch they’re wearing.

If you’ve read this far I made up all of this and don’t believe a word of it.
See less See more
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 5
461 - 480 of 538 Posts
Top