WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner
1 - 20 of 31 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hello from Greece,
I have some watches(Tag 2000, polar etc) but last month I saw paw 1500T and I like it, except the size(according to Tag), I also saw the paw1300 which is a little thinner and the difference between these two is :

Is there any other difference?
What do you propose?
:thanks
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,181 Posts
Paw1300 has the 24 hours countdown timer.

I personally prefer the PAW1500 which I got recently but either one is a great watch and it's down to your own personal preference.

The PAW1300 will be cheaper but without the features you mentioned i.e moon, tide etc. Other than that they are basically the same watch.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,319 Posts
i personally like the 1300G personally. its thinner and i like the design better.
1500 is filled with functions and gadgets but i know i will never use them.
not sure bout the sensors update but i do know that the 1500 doesnt shoots rockets and laser.
 

· Moderator G-Shock Forum
Joined
·
21,225 Posts
Hello Harry,

Welcome to our forum. Sorry I can't help you with your question, since I don't own these watches. I must say they both look great to me. Eventually I will buy one of these myself too. There I live at sea with a lot of tide, I think I'll go for the PRW-1500

Cheers,

Sjors
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,744 Posts
I have the PAW-1300T. It is dressy enough to wear to work or church. Wears smaller due to being thin, and the way it is rounded at the edges.

It has all of the features I need, and some I do not!



 

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
Thank you all for the welcome :) , in the city I live I cant find them(1300+1500) in the shops, so I`m gonna buy from internet, also my wrist size is 19cm...
WHY so BIG difference in accuracy : +/-20 seconds per month???(without calibration), is it possible?
Also can you inform about titanium or the plastic?
I see that titanium looks better but when your hands are sweat or wet which one perform better(in many ways)?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,744 Posts
For me its not a titanium vs. anything, it is a bracelet vs. band. I like the flexibility of the bracelet. And it is gets too wet/sweaty, I just loosen the clasp for a moment, wipe dry, then buckle again. Hard to do that with a band, and not having to worry about the watch dropping.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,319 Posts
I think that titanium is more sensitive to hits, marks etc than the plastic(resin?) wrist which you cant see them because of the black color, am I wrong?
never did have a titanium but i have a steel bracelet.
i have to be careful when wearing my steel bracelet. i have to make sure that it didnt scratched or bang against other objects. to make matter worse, its a black IP. i stop wearing that watch once i got the GW1500 with resin band.

with the resin, i dun have to worry about anything. i banged it against the wall when moving stuff and it is still "like new". not a mark, not even a scratch. same thing to the resin mudman. no worries there.

moral of the story, i stopped buying bracelets once i got the resin. ;-)
 
1 - 20 of 31 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top