WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,784 Posts
Probably because each one is good at what it's designed to do.

It's the same reason that I have a socket set AND combination wrenches AND crescent wrenches in my toolbox.

It's the same reason why I've liked (and owned) a variety of cars, SUV's, a motorcycle and a minivan.

Most G-Shocks are good at a LOT of things, but there are still compromises because Casio doesn't make ONE model with EVERY SINGLE available feature -- and they probably never will. (Victorinox makes a Swiss Army Knife with practically every tool they ever offered, but in doing so it gets away from its practicality as a "pocket knife." If Casio tried to do the same thing, and make the display large enough to be legible, it would probably be the size of a small wall clock. :-d )

If you buy just one or two more G-Shocks -- especially if they're NOT "squares" like your current favorites -- you'll probably see why many of us here own multiple G-Shocks, and why Casio makes so many different models. Some models are just better at certain things, while other models are better at others.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,122 Posts
Discussion Starter #5 (Edited)
It's weird, both cost the same.. the atomic one is an extra feature I can ignore, if i didnt need to use it... but i still feel torn between the two...

maybe its because it's one less thing to worry about...

Less power use?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,141 Posts
You don't need to worry about power use with non-ABC watches. You just don't have enough functions to take the watch down from 'H'. My GW-5000 was at 'M' for a day when I first got it and I have never seen it drop from 'H' in over two years. Even ABC watches usually stay on 'H' if you keep them in the sun from time to time. That being said, my PRG-270 dips down to 'M' if I use the pressure tracking function for too long, though it was in a box for quite some time and I got it right as the winter started (it has never made it too far into 'H').

EDIT: This is incorrect, I was thinking of the GW-5600.

If it helps any, they are both slightly different, aesthetically speaking. They are both "squares" but the G5600 is more square whereas the GWM (and DW-5600, GW-5000) is more rectangular. The G5600 bezel is not compatible with the GWM.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,784 Posts
It's weird, both cost the same.. the atomic one is an extra feature I can ignore, if i didnt need to use it... but i still feel torn between the two...

maybe its because it's one less thing to worry about...

Less power use?
It's one less thing to worry about for YOU, but it's one less feature that the rest of us enjoy having but most of us don't obsess over.

If someone lives in India or Australia and wants a solar square, there's not much need for them to pay extra for the atomic feature that they can't easily use. (They're the same cost at Amazon here in the US, but the atomic version has a higher MSRP.)

There is SLIGHTLY less power use with the "solar only" model because it can't go into "receive mode" -- go read the "Power Supply" section on the last page of each of the manuals.

G5600E manual: http://support.casio.com/storage/en/manual/pdf/EN/009/qw3160.pdf

GW-5610 manual: http://support.casio.com/storage/en/manual/pdf/EN/009/qw3159.pdf
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,122 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
If it helps any, they are both slightly different, aesthetically speaking. They are both "squares" but the G5600 is more square whereas the GWM (and DW-5600, GW-5000) is more rectangular. The G5600 bezel is not compatible with the GWM.

You don't need to worry about power use with non-ABC watches. You just don't have enough functions to take the watch down from 'H'. My GW-5000 was at 'M' for a day when I first got it and I have never seen it drop from 'H' in over two years. Even ABC watches usually stay on 'H' if you keep them in the sun from time to time. That being said, my PRG-270 dips down to 'M' if I use the pressure tracking function for too long, though it was in a box for quite some time and I got it right as the winter started (it has never made it too far into 'H').

If I had to spend $10 more dollars on my gw-m5610 for it to not have auto EL, I would pay extra...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,141 Posts
If I had to spend $10 more dollars on my gw-m5610 for it to not have auto EL, I would pay extra...
I always have my Auto-EL turned off. I treat it as a "nice to have" but something I never use. I have played with it from time to time but I have a knack for activating it FAR too often. The power use doesn't concern me, it is more about having a glowing wrist all the time and the light catching my glance.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,794 Posts
If it helps any, they are both slightly different, aesthetically speaking. They are both "squares" but the G5600 is more square whereas the GWM (and DW-5600, GW-5000) is more rectangular. The G5600 bezel is not compatible with the GWM.
Actually, just want to quickly point out that the G-5600E has the same case design as the GW-M5610, whereas the GW-5000 and DW-5600E has the older case design

As for OP's question, choosing between these two comes down to :

1. Do you need atomic sync?
2. Do you prefer an homage to DW-5000C or an homage to DW-5600C?
3. The GW-M5610 has a higher quality back plate, which looks nicer, but makes no difference when you wear it

But really, I still think anyone serious about squares and like the history behind it should really just get the GW-5000, you know that you'll eventually get to the GW-5000, so why spend money on a bunch of other watches along the way. That is at least my experience, once I got my GW-5000, I've rarely worn any of my other squares
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,141 Posts
Actually, just want to quickly point out that the G-5600E has the same case design as the GW-M5610, whereas the GW-5000 and DW-5600E has the older case design

As for OP's question, choosing between these two comes down to :

1. Do you need atomic sync?
2. Do you prefer an homage to DW-5000C or an homage to DW-5600C?
3. The GW-M5610 has a higher quality back plate, which looks nicer, but makes no difference when you wear it

But really, I still think anyone serious about squares and like the history behind it should really just get the GW-5000, you know that you'll eventually get to the GW-5000, so why spend money on a bunch of other watches along the way. That is at least my experience, once I got my GW-5000, I've rarely worn any of my other squares
Whoops! Sorry, you are right. I was thinking about the GW-5600, which is the oddball (other than the Ref Timer).

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,000 Posts
I sleep with my watch on... so i cant use PS mode or Auto EL. One thing thats missing is the after glow delay. 2 seconds is a bit too quick for me.
I agree regarding the duration of the display illumination. 1.5 seconds is too short. All of my other G-Shocks can go to at least 3 seconds, and one can go to 5 seconds.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,784 Posts
I hope you realize you can just turn off auto EL. There is no need to have different models with and without it.
One more vote for "just turn auto EL off or on as desired."

Can you imagine if Casio made EIGHT versions of the same watch? With and without auto EL, one with 1.5 second backlight duration and one with 3 second backlight duration, then all four versions would have to come with the buyer's choice of 12 or 24 hour clock? Then they could make eight MORE models with a choice of "auto-synch" or "ONLY manual synch" and so on.... :) :roll: It's easier to just make ONE model with choices in the "main settings menu."

Auto EL IS easier to accidentally turn on or off by pressing the light button for too long -- the easy solution is to just lightly press the button and then let go. :-!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,141 Posts
OP, have you thought about trying out some of Timex's models? They don't have nearly the same build quality and robustness as a G-Shock (at least in my opinion), but they tend to have better user interfaces. There are a bunch that allow you to customize the menus (e.g. remove unused functions from the menu rotation) and some have a really nifty night mode (any button press turns the light on, and as long as you keep pressing a button once every 3 seconds it will stay on) which is handy for interacting with the watch in the dark.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,122 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
OP, have you thought about trying out some of Timex's models? They don't have nearly the same build quality and robustness as a G-Shock (at least in my opinion), but they tend to have better user interfaces. There are a bunch that allow you to customize the menus (e.g. remove unused functions from the menu rotation) and some have a really nifty night mode (any button press turns the light on, and as long as you keep pressing a button once every 3 seconds it will stay on) which is handy for interacting with the watch in the dark.
Does Timex make a solar or atomic version? Send me a link to one that can replace the 5610
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top