WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner
21 - 33 of 33 Posts
... COSC certified? Are any of Omega's quartz movements , for that matter?
Almost all of the early ones were COSC certified. None of the recent ones have been.
 
The Cal 1680 based Constellation Double Eagle would have passed. Indeed, Omega has used a number of thermolines in the past all of which would have passed...
Omega used only one Thermoline (Cal.1680 = ETA 252.511). The earlier thermocompensated movements in the Omega watches (Cal. 1441 = ETA 255.561 and Cal.1445 = 255.572) could not be Thermolines as they were no longer available in 2001 when ETA introduced its Thermoline Family of thermocompensated movements.
 
The Cal 1680 based Constellation Double Eagle would have passed. Indeed, Omega has used a number of thermolines in the past all of which would have passed. I suspect they just saw no marketing motivation in adding Chronometer to the dial.
Which is a bit strange since they reinstated a TC movement after dropping the 1441 for the 1438 on the Seamaster 200m, would love to know the "story" on why that happened at the time...
 
My 2 pre-Bond quartz models-one a 1441 and the other 1438 - are seconds hand accurate. But my two Omega X-33s show one accurate and the other off the markers. My late 1980s Polaris quartz is accurate....

So it is, for sure, rather hit and miss, not just with Omega but many other quartz brands.
 
Yes, found that out at a dealer the other day, wonder why they removed that rare bird from their catalogue, I guess it wasn't selling well enough, strange since their can't be too many perpetual calendars around. Maybe a chronometer cert would have helped.

As for my comment, it was referring specifically to the 1538 movement, the topic of this thread ;-)
 
21 - 33 of 33 Posts