I get that you’re angry. After reading your thread, you have every right to be and I would be, too. However, I’d argue the sample size of complaints is beyond small at this point.
Of course, make your own decisions based on past experiences and follow your gut but this reads like tarring with an extremely broad brush.
Mine would be, too and I’m glad you acknowledge the sample size is still very small, even with the addition of your negative experience.
I’m not making excuses for GS but my overall takeaway is that many brands need to do better. I’ve read similar service horror stories about JLC, Zenith, IWC and a handful of others that, given what they charge, should get it right the first time.
One thing is for sure, I will be extra careful if I have to send in a GS for service. I just purchased my second and will probably take detailed photos and maybe even video prior to shipping it to Mahwah if and when the time comes.
Absolutely, LosAngelesTimer, you are right that the sample size of complaints about Mahwah is small. Still, it's interesting to me that with all the people active on this subforum who have heard that GS Mahwah's work is dodgy, the only positive Mahwah service work I can recall was a quick mention by Nokie that he had one good and one bad experience with them.
I also agree with the good points raised by BrianBinFL, especially "I think at the end of the day the best that you can do is buy watches that speak to you and that you enjoy wearing. And if you need service, and the experience sucks, then you just have to deal with it - just like the rest of life. It would be nice if you got a premium service experience to go along with the premium price tag, but as you said, that might just not be the way things are these days." He said a lot of what I'm thinking better than I could have.
One would think that when a watch is returned to Mahwah for rework, Mahwah would know to be extra careful. I'd expect the boutique to mention it when they ship the watch. Maybe they did that here, but I don't think Mahwah got that message. The fact that my SBGJ001 went back for rework, returned with new damage, and had to go back again is mind-boggling.
As mentioned in my thread, my service experiences with WatchMann, SGUS, Stowa/Tempus Arte (and also Wilson Watch Works, forgot about that one) were fine - the watches went out, the watches came back serviced and undamaged. I think that, as BrianBinFL suggested, GS just doesn't care to improve their service (kind of like Seiko's diver bezel alignment issues?). What gets me is that GS promotes the luxury buying experience, nice boutiques, attentive representatives, but the level of service work I experienced was poor.
As for your second point, I took plenty of photos and it didn't make a difference as far as Mahwah damaging the watch, the photos will only help you after they get their hands on your watch and you are arguing with them about fixing screwups. BTW, the boutique rep mentioned that Mahwah photographs the watch upon receipt, I expect most high-end service operations do that. Since GS never disputed my contention that they caused the new scratches, I assume their photos backed me up.
Maybe the best GS mechanical ownership strategy is to buy a new or nearly-new GS, wear it happily for a few years, and then flip it at a reasonable price before the movement gets hinky, so you avoid the need for servicing. Or look to Spring Drives for their longer service intervals, or the 9Fs, which I understand require little attention beyond battery and seal changes.
Now - with apologies to OP - I am going to stop commenting in this thread - I've caused enough hijacking.