WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Cheapest, most basic watch you could be happy with

24K views 230 replies 184 participants last post by  Mr Dennis  
#1 ·
I've just spent more money on new watches in the past few weeks than I have in the past several years, while I was taking a bit of a hiatus from watch stuff.

It makes me a bit reflective and wonder if it's a mistake, if I'm just giving into materialistic impulses for no good reason, and maybe I should just pare down and go back to my hiatus. It makes me wonder how stripped back I could really be as a watch-wearer, and still feel some kind of satisfaction with the watch on my wrist.

What would you consider your bare minimum, if you had to take a monastic vow of watch minimalism and pare down to a single, cheapest, most basic watch? What inexpensive, simple watch would still give you that little horological thrill when you glanced at it on your wrist? Something that does it all for the cheapest possible price, like the Casio F91W-1? A watch that replicates an iconic aesthetic with serious capabilities and credentials like the MDV106 Marlin? Or would you still feel drawn to something mechanical, like the previous gen Seiko 5 automatics that used to be $50 on Amazon? Maybe the cheapest you'd consider going would still be a brand with history and provenance and "Swiss Made" on the dial, like a Hamilton Khaki field watch?

I'm curious to know how minimalist you could go....

Image

Image

Image

(A few pics borrowed from the web because threads are useless without them.)
 
#6 ·
Probably something like my G-Shock GW5610 would suffice. Under $100 (at least when I got it), Tough Solar, and Multiband 6 would mean accuracy and no battery changes. Plus, it's still got a little cred with watch folks and it's something I enjoy wearing.
 
#11 · (Edited)
I could probably tide myself over alright with my HMT Janata at $15, but I trust it to have ANY water resistance about as much as I trust my toddler not to try to stick a Tide Pod in his mouth when I'm not looking. For even the bare minimum of some water resistance, I'd probably say from my collection if I was left with only my Hamilton Khaki Field Auto or my Nth Scorpene as my cheapest watch, and only watch left, I'd still be alright.
 
#14 ·
OP, I could be haPpy with any number of watches under $50 bucks. I even had the exact Seiko 5 in green that you pictured. The only reason I sold it is I felt it was too small for my wrist.

One of my favorite watches is my Timex Ironman. Probably bought it 15-20 years ago for under $20 dollars. I think in all that time I've changed the battery maybe two or three times.
 
#16 · (Edited)
Most affordable at msrp I use the most is my Orient star seeker gmt power reserve. It's just good.. does everything I need it to and looks the part. A lot of watch for the money. Fact that it's my pick up and go is testament to me of that. :)

Image



Edit. NB... wrt to power reserve in an auto... since I do wear different watches for different things during the course of my day.. its handy to have to have a visual to give it a bit of a wind up to top it off.. easy to do without a screw down crown. Given it's age.. I wouldn't trust it's 100m wr anyway consciously least since it still keeps great time and has never been serviced. (Yet).
 
#17 ·
For myself, I actually pulled one of my Casio Marlins - black dial with green bezel - out of the box last night to see if I thought I could wear it exclusively for a while. Unfortunately with my 6" wrists, it is just too big to truly be a one-and-done. It's fun to wear for a bit but too overpowering for everyday use. I think this would be my answer if it were 38, 40, even 42mm instead of 44mm. (I'm aware there is a new "38mm" version but apparently it is actually 35-36mm with 16mm lugs, plus loses some of the features of the full-sized Marlin that make it so good like the screw-down crown, screw-down caseback, and good WR.)
 
#20 ·
This is a fun thread, I like to think about stuff like this. I wish I could wear the Duro and then that would be it. It’s too big for my 6.25” wrist though :(

So I would go with an older 5. I am wearin this one right now, and it would do pretty well for me. The finish on it is awesome. I even like the bracelet (though most do not seem to like the bracelets in these inexpensive Seikos ).

Image
 
#22 ·
Automatic: a Seiko Turtle
Quartz: Citzen "Ray Mears" Promaster
 
#28 ·
When I visited Switzerland last summer I got myself a Tissot PRX and a MoonSwatch.

Both have been seeing way more wrist time than they should have. I suppose I’m pretty happy with them.

Image



Image