They are both good looking watches but I would be inclined to go for the Hamilton.

 

Welcome to WUS, I hope you enjoy your stay! Both are nice watches from companies with a history of quality.

I would go with the Hamilton (I would shop around for price). I prefer the leather strap, rose gold, and generally sportier look of the Hamilton, especially if it were something that I would be planning to wear regularly.

 

Omega for me,that Hammy is just meh...

 

None of them is my cup of tea.

 

The Hamilton's dial just assaulted my eyes in a dark alley

I prefer the minimalist dial of the Omega.

 

I like Hamilton's but that one is too complicated to read easily IMHO.

For me, my choice between those 2 would also depend on the size of the Omega - vintage are often too small. (<40mm)

 

Not a fan of gold, but between the two the Omega is IMO infinitely more pleasing to the eye than the Hamilton which looks like something out of the TW Steel catalogue (i.e it looks horrible)

 

I understand your dilemma. Tough to choose between two very similar watches...

I'm not a fan of either, but I'd go with the more simple one.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Omega

 

The Omega because u can get rid of it when u don't want it anymore, what where they thinking at Hamilton; we actually want to build a heli platform as a watch?

 

Hamiltons are great but the one you have picked doesn't really appeal to me. Having said that I would definitely go for most Hamiltons over that particular Omega.

 

Both are polar opposites, but I too would look at the Omega first.

 

I think now we all know what happens when you breed an Invicta with a Hublot....

Go with the Omega, it's much nicer

 

i wouldn't rush into either of them. they're just so different from one another, it's hard to determine what you're exactly looking for.

 

I like omega more... a classic beauty