WatchUSeek Watch Forums banner

Review of the newest iteration of the Navy Blue Angles Skyhawk (JY8078-52L)

1 reading
10K views 23 replies 11 participants last post by  heb  
#1 ·
I saw this watch in a recent International Watch magazine and bought it on a whim yesterday (25 July 2018). Here is the fastest review ever.

I like the looks of the military style cardinal arabics and the larger size of the GMT dial. The slide rule numbers are carefully placed which allows for accurate calculations. The shape of it is more "tuna can" than pictures of the other variants I have seen. It has typical Citizen capability, including a forced time signal feature that worked the FIRST time I attempted same; hard to believe isn't it? But true.

It didn't take me long to go through the instruction manual to setup the watch either. One thing to remember is that it uses the "old style" radio signals to keep accurate time, not satellite capture. That's a good thing since you don't have to take the watch outside every time you want to update the thing.

Unfortunately, the watch has a significant "con", and that's its "clunkiness". At 45mm X 14.7mm and 179 grams (2 links removed), it is as clunky as a typical mechanical diver's or chronograph wristwatch. I know they had to use steel to keep the price down, but I would have gladly paid an extra $200 or so for a titanium version. I suspect I will eventually replace the functional bracelet with a rubber strap. That should reduce its overall weight by about 1/3. Anyway, its size/mass is reason enough for me to put this in the "Not Recommended" category.

heb
 
#2 ·
I kinda like it. But I prefer my AT8020-03L a bit more probably because it's a bit smaller and less busy.

Also is it still using the stupid 23mm lugs? Can't for the life of me find a decent strap option.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slm643 and heb
#4 ·
I kinda like it. But I prefer my AT8020-03L a bit more probably because it's a bit smaller and less busy.

Also is it still using the stupid 23mm lugs? Can't for the life of me find a decent strap option.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk
Do you have any photos of a 22mm strap on it?

I've been looking at that watch for 2 years... I love it..

Sent from my K92 using Tapatalk
 
#7 · (Edited)
I don't know about the other models, this is the first one I considered. Now that you mention it, I don't know what the lug width of my watch is. Once I measure it and get the appropriate sized rubber strap, I'll post a picture of it.

Thanks, heb

PS The lug width is 22mm. So getting any type of after market straps for it will be easy.

Sounds like all your "cons" are personal preference issues, how did you feel about the other models? Let us know when you get the new rubber!

Sent from my K92 using Tapatalk
 
#8 ·
I saw this watch in a recent International Watch magazine and bought it on a whim yesterday (25 July 2018). Here is the fastest review ever.

I like the looks of the military style cardinal arabics and the larger size of the GMT dial. The slide rule numbers are carefully placed which allows for accurate calculations. The shape of it is more "tuna can" than pictures of the other variants I have seen. It has typical Citizen capability, including a forced time signal feature that worked the FIRST time I attempted same; hard to believe isn't it? But true.

It didn't take me long to go through the instruction manual to setup the watch either. One thing to remember is that it uses the "old style" radio signals to keep accurate time, not satellite capture. That's a good thing since you don't have to take the watch outside every time you want to update the thing.

Unfortunately, the watch has a significant "con", and that's its "clunkiness". At 45mm X 14.7mm and 179 grams (2 links removed), it is as clunky as a typical mechanical diver's or chronograph wristwatch. I know they had to use steel to keep the price down, but I would have gladly paid an extra $200 or so for a titanium version. I suspect I will eventually replace the functional bracelet with a rubber strap. That should reduce its overall weight by about 1/3. Anyway, its size/mass is reason enough for me to put this in the "Not Recommended" category.

heb View attachment 13338815
That's a good looking watch, but as you pointed out it's pretty big and thick.

At least this one has a sapphire crystal. So many Citizen ana-digis have a mineral glass crystal, which isn't my preference.

https://us.citizenwatch.com/us/en/mens-promaster-skyhawk-a-t/JY8078-52L.html
 
#15 ·
I know nobody really uses the slide rule for aviation calculations, but I'd like to know that it is in principle usable as such. The new version does away with the time scale, which eliminates some of the functions of the slide rule. I noticed that Breitling has bee doing the same for a while. I'll pass on the new version and stick with my earlier versions.
 
#17 ·
In a pinch it is still useable for time/distance calculations. For example: Ground speed = 420kts (7 miles/minute) and distance to go is 500nm. Rotate and eyeball the "420" over the triangle on the dial. Look under the "50" on the rotatable bezel and read "72" (approximately, remember you have got to do a lot of eyeballing). You just have to remember the 72 minutes represents one hour and 12 minutes, not 7.2 minutes. I think that is within the capabilities of most pilots.

heb
 
#24 ·
***Update***
Yesterday, 17 August 2018, I replaced the bracelet with a "The Watch Steward" elastic strap. Overall time system weight went from 179 grams to 107 grams, a rather significant 40% reduction in weight. It is not that I forget I have a watch on, but much closer to that than before. But then again, who here wants to forget about his/her watch.

I am not picture capable so will have to paint a verbal picture as best I can. The strap provides for a comfortable fit and gives the watch a more "serious look" if you know what I mean; similar to the pictures our friend GaryK30 posted above. I got a dark blue strap for it which matches the watch color very nicely. Probably would have chosen black if that color was available.

So what advantages does this strap have over a NATO strap. For me, there are two: 1. It provides a sleeker image, unlike a NATO with all its strap end folds; 2. It allows for better watch centering on wrist, hence more comfortable wear. Any disadvantages? One that I can think of at this point. The "hook and loop" buckle takes a more deliberate effort to fasten than a typical tang buckle configuration. Not inherently difficult, but not something you can do quickly, in the dark.

How it will hold up to multiple perspiration soaks while on the elliptical trainer is TBD.

heb